AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G
Core i5-14400T
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G vs Intel Core i5-14400T
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G and the Intel Core i5-14400T are both capable desktop processors, but the recorded data shows they serve different performance priorities. The AMD part is a newer 8-core design on a 4 nm process, while the Intel part is a 10-core hybrid design on a 10 nm process. The benchmark results for the Intel Core i5-14400T provide a clear picture of its strengths in multi-threaded workloads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G, with its higher boost clock and newer architecture, is positioned for different tasks. The core counts differ: 8 cores for AMD versus 10 for Intel, though both support 16 threads.
Where Each One Wins
Based on the available data, the Intel Core i5-14400T demonstrates clear dominance in multi-core and throughput-oriented tasks. Its Cinebench scores are substantial: 17,189 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7,219 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. These results indicate that the Intel processor excels in rendering, video encoding, and other workloads that scale with core count and sustained parallelism. The PassMark multi-thread score of 20,223 further reinforces this, showing strong performance in applications that can use all available threads simultaneously.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G, while lacking direct benchmark scores in the database, is defined by its specifications. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz is higher than the Intel part's 4.50 GHz, which suggests a potential advantage in lightly threaded or single-core dependent tasks. The AMD processor uses the newer Gorgon Point codename with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, which typically delivers higher instructions per clock. The database shows the AMD chip has a 50th percentile ranking versus all CPUs, while the Intel chip sits at the 79th percentile, indicating that the Intel part is positioned higher in overall performance distribution.
The Intel Core i5-14400T also shows specific strengths in the PassMark sub-tests. Its data compression score of 235,636 is exceptionally high, and its integer math score of 65,667 and floating point math score of 49,139 show strong arithmetic throughput. These results point to a processor that handles data processing, scientific calculations, and general productivity software with ease. The AMD chip does not have recorded benchmark data in the database, so the measured wins all belong to the Intel part in the current records.
Architecture Differences
The architectural split between these two processors is significant. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G is built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, which is a more advanced manufacturing technology compared to Intel's 10 nm node used for the Core i5-14400T. This process advantage typically leads to better power efficiency per transistor and potentially higher clock speeds, which is reflected in the AMD chip's 5.10 GHz boost clock.
The core designs are fundamentally different. The AMD processor uses the Gorgon Point codename with a hybrid mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation. This design prioritizes a balance of performance and efficiency. The Intel Core i5-14400T uses Raptor Lake-R, part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, which also employs a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the exact core distribution.
Cache layouts differ notably. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has the same 80 KB L1 per core, but 1.25 MB of L2 per core and a larger 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This extra L3 cache on the Intel part can be beneficial for workloads that repeatedly access larger data sets.
Memory support also separates the two. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also dual-channel, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. This means the Intel part offers more flexibility for users with existing DDR4 systems, while the AMD part is locked to newer memory standards. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 12 lanes, while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes, offering more bandwidth and lanes for expansion.
The integrated graphics are also different. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G includes the Radeon 860M, while the Intel Core i5-14400T includes UHD Graphics 730. The die sizes differ as well: 195 mm² for the AMD part versus 215 mm² for the Intel part.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between these two processors, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has no individual benchmark scores recorded. All measured performance data belongs to the Intel Core i5-14400T. The Intel part's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,189 places it firmly in a high-performance tier for threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 7,219 and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1,732 show consistent scaling across versions of the Cinebench suite.
In single-core tests, the Intel processor records a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,426 and a Cinebench R20 single-core score of 1,018. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3,512 indicates solid per-thread performance, though the AMD part's higher 5.10 GHz boost clock suggests it could potentially be faster in these tests, but no data confirms this.
The PassMark suite reveals specific workload characteristics. The data compression score of 235,636 is the highest recorded sub-test result for the Intel chip, showing exceptional capability in compression algorithms. The random string sorting score of 25,181, extended instructions score of 14,562, and data encryption score of 13,244 all show strong results. The physics score of 1,244 and find prime numbers score of 73 are lower relative to other sub-tests, indicating these are not the processor's primary strengths.
The Intel Core i5-14400T has an average benchmark score of 27,166 and sits at the 79th percentile versus all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i9-9900K with an average score of 27,097 and a delta of 0.3 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G with a score of 27,051 and a delta of 0.4 percent, the Intel Core i7-13700H with a score of 27,355 and a delta of -0.7 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G with a score of 27,382 and a delta of -0.8 percent. This places the Intel chip in a tightly contested performance cluster, with all four rivals within one percentage point of its score.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has 8 cores. Both processors support 16 threads.
Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core i5-14400T's boost clock of 4.50 GHz.
Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?
A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has 8 MB of L3 cache.
Q: What memory types are supported by each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core i5-14400T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both are dual-channel and support ECC.
Q: What is the process node for each chip?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G is built on TSMC's 4 nm process. The Intel Core i5-14400T is built on Intel's 10 nm process.
Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400T compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has an average benchmark score of 27,166. It is 0.3 percent ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K, 0.4 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, and 0.7 percent and 0.8 percent behind the Intel Core i7-13700H and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, respectively.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across several key specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G uses the AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel Core i5-14400T uses the Intel Socket 1700. The core counts are 8 for the AMD part versus 10 for the Intel part. The base clocks differ: 2.00 GHz for the AMD chip and 1.50 GHz for the Intel chip. The boost clocks are 5.10 GHz for AMD and 4.50 GHz for Intel. The TDP ratings are 65 watts for the AMD part and 35 watts for the Intel part.
The process nodes are 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The codenames are Gorgon Point for AMD and Raptor Lake-R for Intel. The generations are Ryzen AI PRO 400 with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores for AMD, and Core i5 with Raptor Lake Refresh for Intel. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 20 MB for Intel. The memory support is DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD, versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD, with no figure recorded for Intel. The PCIe support is Gen 4 with 12 lanes for AMD, versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. The integrated graphics are Radeon 860M for AMD and UHD Graphics 730 for Intel. The die sizes are 195 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel. The release dates are March 2026 for AMD and January 2024 for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The part numbers are 100-000001914 for AMD and SRN3N for Intel.