AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G and Intel Core i5-14400F are both desktop processors with a TDP of 65 and 16 threads, but their recorded data profiles are not symmetrical. The Intel part has a full benchmark suite, an average benchmark score of 32,279, and an 83rd percentile ranking; the AMD part has no recorded benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and an average benchmark score of 0. This asymmetry is the defining fact of the comparison.

Where Each One Wins

The database records zero benchmark wins for either processor in this pairing, and no head-to-head benchmark entries exist between them. The use-case split therefore comes from specification differences rather than measured results.

The AMD part is the only one with an integrated GPU, the Radeon 860M. It also carries the higher boost clock, 5.10 versus 4.70, the smaller process node, 4 nm versus 10 nm, and the only listed memory bandwidth figure, 89.6 GB/s. Its release date, 2026-03-01, is later than the Intel part's 2024-01-07.

The Intel part is the only one with recorded benchmark data. It also has more cores, 10 versus 8, a higher base clock, 2.50 versus 2.00, more L2 per core, 1.25 MB versus 1 MB, more L3 cache, 20 MB shared versus 8 MB, and a wider PCIe link, Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes versus Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

In practical terms, the AMD part is the candidate for a build that wants an iGPU and an AM5 socket; the Intel part is the candidate for a build that wants more cores, larger caches, DDR4 compatibility, PCIe Gen 5, and a measured benchmark record.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G uses the Gorgon Point codename and is listed under the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation with Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14400F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, is part of the Core 14th Gen series, and is built on the Raptor Lake architecture.

Manufacturing also differs. AMD's chip is fabricated by TSMC at 4 nm with a die size of 195 mm². Intel's chip is fabricated by Intel at 10 nm with a die size of 215 mm². The database does not list transistor counts for either part, so die size and process node are the only physical comparisons available.

Core and cache organization differs as well. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part has 10 cores and 16 threads, so thread count is identical even though core count is not. Both use 80 KB L1 per core. The AMD part uses 1 MB L2 per core and an 8 MB L3 cache. The Intel part uses 1.25 MB L2 per core and a 20 MB shared L3 cache.

Memory and I/O features separate the two further. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 but has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. Both are dual-channel and ECC-capable. The AMD part exposes PCIe Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes; the Intel part exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The AMD part includes a Radeon 860M integrated GPU, while the Intel part lists integrated graphics as N/A.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark entries are recorded for this pairing, so there are no direct win margins to report. The Intel part's isolated benchmark suite is the only set of measured scores in the database.

In Cinebench, the Intel Core i5-14400F records 2,181 multi-core and 307 single-core in R15, 9,090 multi-core and 1,283 single-core in R20, and 21,645 multi-core and 3,055 single-core in R23. In Geekbench, it records 11,268 multi-core and 2,058 single-core. In PassMark, it records 25,470 multi-thread and 3,701 single-thread. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,701 appears in both single-thread entries in the database.

The PassMark suite also provides specialized scores: data compression 315,521, data encryption 16,949, extended instructions 19,937, find prime numbers 86, floating point math 61,319, integer math 81,524, physics 1,523, and random string sorting 32,680.

The Intel part's average benchmark score is 32,279, placing it at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly grouped: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U with an average score of 32,233 and a 0.1 percent difference, Intel Core i9-11900 with 32,226 and a 0.2 percent difference, AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS with 32,354 and a -0.2 percent difference, and Intel Core i7-12800H with 32,121 and a 0.5 percent difference. All four sit within 0.5% of the Intel part's average.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score is 0 and its percentile is listed as 50, but there is no measured score behind that ranking in this comparison. Because the AMD part has no scores, no percentage difference can be calculated between these two processors.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The AMD part includes a Radeon 860M. The Intel part lists integrated graphics as N/A.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel and ECC-capable.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD part has a boost clock of 5.10, while the Intel part has a boost clock of 4.70.

Q: What are the PCIe differences?

A: The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Q: Is either processor listed with an unlocked multiplier?

A: Neither processor is listed with an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two processors differ.

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G | Intel Core i5-14400F |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Not listed | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Base clock | 2.00 | 2.50 |

| Boost clock | 5.10 | 4.70 |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Not listed | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 195 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 860M | N/A |

| Release date | 2026-03-01 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $196 |

| Part number | 100-000001914 | SRN3RSRN47 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 32,279 |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 50 | 83 |

The Verdict

The data prevents a measured performance verdict. The Intel Core i5-14400F is the only processor in this pairing with benchmark results, an average score of 32,279, and an 83rd percentile placement. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has no recorded scores and an average score of 0, so there is no basis to claim a performance win for either part.

The feature split is clear. The AMD part is the only option with an integrated GPU, the Radeon 860M, and the only option on the AM5 socket. It also has the higher boost clock, 5.10, and the smaller process node, 4 nm. The Intel part is the only option with 10 cores, a 20 MB shared L3 cache, DDR4 support, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, and a measured benchmark record.

The data implies that this comparison is not a head-to-head performance contest. It is a feature-based choice between an AMD processor with an iGPU and a smaller process node, and an Intel processor with more cores, larger caches, DDR4 support, faster PCIe, and the only recorded performance scores in the database. The data points to the AMD part for integrated-graphics and AM5 use cases, and to the Intel part for measured-performance, core-count, cache, DDR4, and PCIe Gen 5 use cases.