AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database does not contain any head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G and the Intel Core 3 201E. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor has a wins tally in direct comparison. However, the Intel Core 3 201E has a full set of individual benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has no recorded benchmark scores at all. This asymmetry means the only measurable performance data available for comparison comes from the Intel side.

The Intel Core 3 201E posts a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,613 and a single-core score of 1,780. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5,297 multi-core and 747 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 run yields 1,271 multi-core and 179 single-core. PassMark results for the Intel part include a multi-thread score of 14,839 and a single-thread score of 3,482. Its integer math score is 43,894, floating point math is 33,260, and extended instructions reach 11,035. Data compression scores 164,160, data encryption scores 8,931, and random string sorting scores 17,783. Physics processing in PassMark records 1,141, while find prime numbers scores 57.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. The Intel Core 3 201E holds a percentile of 73, which places it above the median in the database. The AMD part sits exactly at the 50th percentile, meaning half of all recorded CPUs fall below it and half above, but this percentile is not backed by any actual benchmark runs in the data. Without concrete scores for the AMD processor, no direct numerical wins can be established in either direction for this head-to-head pairing.

The Intel Core 3 201E carries an average benchmark score of 19,056. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19,047 (a delta of 0 percent), the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19,039 (delta of 0.1 percent), the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18,982 (delta of 0.4 percent), and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18,979 (delta of 0.4 percent). This places the Intel Core 3 201E marginally ahead of each of these processors, with the largest recorded advantage being 0.4 percent over the Core i5-1335U and the EPYC 7773X. The performance gap is narrow, indicating that the Intel part sits in a tightly contested performance band.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The benchmark array for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G is empty, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What is the Intel Core 3 201E's best single-core Cinebench score?

A: The highest single-core Cinebench score for the Intel Core 3 201E is 1,780 in Cinebench R23, with 747 in R20 and 179 in R15.

Q: How does the Intel Core 3 201E compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E has an average benchmark score of 19,056, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS scores 19,047, a delta of 0 percent. The two are effectively tied in the database.

Q: What percentile ranking does each processor hold?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G holds a percentile of 50, while the Intel Core 3 201E holds a percentile of 73.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 3 201E's 4.80 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G and the Intel Core 3 201E have ECC memory support listed as true.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G wins on structural specifications that do not require benchmark data. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, double the core and thread count of the Intel Core 3 201E, which has 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD part also has a higher boost clock at 5.10 GHz versus 4.80 GHz, though its base clock is lower at 2.00 GHz versus 3.60 GHz. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth favors AMD at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for Intel. The AMD integrated graphics solution is the Radeon 860M, a more capable integrated GPU than Intel's UHD Graphics 730, though neither is benchmarked in the database. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, which indicates a denser and more power-efficient manufacturing process than Intel's 10 nm node.

The Intel Core 3 201E wins in every recorded benchmark category because it is the only processor with benchmark data. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3,482 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,780 demonstrate competent single-thread performance. Its multi-thread PassMark score of 14,839 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,613 provide a baseline for what a 4-core, 8-thread Bartlett Lake desktop processor can deliver. The Intel part also holds the higher percentile ranking at 73 versus 50, and it is the only one of the two with an average benchmark score above zero. In terms of raw measured performance, the Intel Core 3 201E is the only contender with data, so it claims all wins by default.

The Intel processor also wins on PCIe capability, offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD part offers Gen 4 with 12 lanes. This gives the Intel platform a bandwidth advantage for storage and expansion devices that use PCIe Gen 5. The Intel part has a larger L3 cache at 12 MB shared, compared to 8 MB on the AMD part, and a larger L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB. The Intel die size is 163 mm², smaller than the AMD die at 195 mm², though the AMD part uses a more advanced 4 nm process.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G and Intel Core 3 201E differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks differ significantly: 2.00 GHz for AMD versus 3.60 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks also differ, with AMD at 5.10 GHz and Intel at 4.80 GHz. TDP is close but not identical: 65 watts for AMD and 60 watts for Intel.

The socket platforms are completely different. AMD uses Socket AM5, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD codename is Gorgon Point, with a generation listed as Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). The Intel codename is Bartlett Lake, with a generation listed as Core 3 (Bartlett Lake). Process nodes differ: AMD is on 4 nm from TSMC, while Intel is on 10 nm from Intel. Die sizes are 195 mm² for AMD and 163 mm² for Intel.

Cache configurations differ in L2 and L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core, but AMD has 1 MB of L2 per core versus 1.25 MB per core for Intel. AMD has 8 MB of L3, while Intel has 12 MB shared L3. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 76.8 GB/s for Intel. PCIe differs: AMD offers Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ, with AMD using Radeon 860M and Intel using UHD Graphics 730.

The release dates differ by over a year. The Intel Core 3 201E was released on 2025-01-12, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G was released on 2026-03-01. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $134, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers also differ: 100-000001914 for AMD and SRVTR for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G belongs to the Gorgon Point generation, which uses a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core architecture. The Intel Core 3 201E belongs to the Bartlett Lake generation, which uses a different core design. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process at Intel. This manufacturing difference has direct implications for transistor density and power characteristics, though the database does not list transistor counts for either part.

The core count difference is substantial. AMD provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel provides 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD design relies on a higher thread count and a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz to drive performance. The Intel design compensates with a much higher base clock of 3.60 GHz and a larger L3 cache of 12 MB shared, which can help with workloads that benefit from a larger shared cache pool. The AMD L3 cache is 8 MB, and its L2 is 1 MB per core, while Intel's L2 is 1.25 MB per core.

Memory architecture also diverges. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory and 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD platform's higher memory bandwidth and support for LPDDR5X suggest a design oriented toward integrated graphics performance, especially paired with the Radeon 860M. The Intel platform's support for DDR4 gives it an advantage in platform cost flexibility, though pricing details are not part of this analysis.

PCIe architecture differs by generation and lane count. Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while AMD provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes. This makes the Intel platform more suitable for high-bandwidth add-in cards and Gen 5 NVMe storage. The AMD platform's Gen 4 lanes are sufficient for most current devices but do not match the Intel part's raw interface bandwidth.

Both processors list ECC memory support as true, which is notable for desktop segments. Both are also locked processors with no unlocked multiplier. The AMD part has a production status of Active and a release date in 2026, while the Intel part is also Active with a 2025 release date. The market segment for both is Desktop.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G offers double the core and thread count, a higher boost clock, a smaller 4 nm process node, higher memory bandwidth, and a more advanced integrated GPU in the Radeon 860M. Its structural specifications point toward multi-threaded workloads and integrated graphics scenarios. The Intel Core 3 201E offers a higher base clock, a larger L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, DDR4 compatibility, and a smaller die size. It is also the only processor of the two with recorded benchmark scores, holding a 73rd percentile ranking and an average score of 19,056.

For users who prioritize measured performance data, the Intel Core 3 201E is the only option with verifiable numbers. Its benchmark scores show a solid 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor that sits just ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, Intel Core i5-12400F, Intel Core i5-1335U, and AMD EPYC 7773X in the database. The margins over those rivals are small, ranging from 0 to 0.4 percent, which places it in a tightly competitive band.

For users who prioritize core count, thread count, memory bandwidth, and integrated graphics capability, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has the stronger specification sheet. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, indicate a processor designed for parallel workloads and graphics-heavy tasks. The lack of benchmark data for the AMD part means its real-world standing cannot be confirmed from the database, but its specifications are directionally clear.

The choice between the two depends on whether the user values recorded performance data or raw specifications. The Intel part delivers measurable results and a higher percentile ranking. The AMD part delivers a more modern process node, more cores, and a faster integrated GPU. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both support ECC memory. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $134, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP. The database shows one processor with proven scores and one with superior paper specifications, and the verdict follows that distinction.