AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Core i5-14490F Comparison

The benchmark data presents a clear hierarchy between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and the Intel Core i5-14490F. Intel's desktop processor dominates the performance metrics, winning 14 of the 15 recorded head-to-head comparisons. The AMD chip secures only a single, narrow victory in one legacy multi-core test. The average benchmark scores confirm this gap: the Intel part averages 38149 across all tests, while the AMD part averages 35719. This places the Intel processor in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, slightly ahead of the AMD chip's 85th percentile ranking.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive separation occurs in Cinebench testing. In the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, the Intel Core i5-14490F scores 23000 against the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's 14278.5, a substantial 37.9% advantage. The single-core result is even more lopsided in relative terms, with Intel scoring 3247 against AMD's 1954, a 39.8% lead. The older Cinebench R15 suite tells a slightly different story. In R15 multi-core, AMD actually wins with a score of 2336.5 versus Intel's 2318, a marginal 0.8% edge. However, Intel reclaims a commanding lead in R15 single-core, scoring 327 against AMD's 247, a 24.5% difference.

The Passmark suite reinforces Intel's overall dominance, though the margins vary by workload. The largest gaps appear in physics and prime number finding. Intel scores 2093 in Passmark physics, which is 37% higher than AMD's 1318. In the prime numbers test, Intel's 122 beats AMD's 81 by 33.6%. Floating-point math shows a 22.4% Intel advantage, with scores of 66558 and 51639 respectively. Data encryption follows at 20.6% (18225 versus 14462), while data compression shows a 17.1% gap (340026 versus 281834). The multi-threaded Passmark score favors Intel by 16.3%, 28662 against 23994. Random string sorting is 12.7% faster on Intel, and extended instruction workloads show an 8.2% Intel edge.

Not every result is a blowout. The Passmark integer math test is close, with Intel scoring 87844 against AMD's 84868, a 3.4% difference. The single-threaded Passmark scores are effectively identical: Intel records 3873 and AMD records 3872, a delta of 0%. This near-tie in single-thread Passmark performance stands in contrast to the large single-core gap observed in Cinebench, indicating that the two processors have different strengths depending on the specific instruction mix.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies and market segments. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is a mobile processor built for AMD Socket FP8. It uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Krackan Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The chip is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 28 watts, reflecting its mobile focus. Cache is organized as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache.

The Intel Core i5-14490F is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. It uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen family and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Intel fabricates this chip on a 10 nm process, and the die measures 215 mm². It provides 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 65 watts. Its cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a larger 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it, and it does not support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity favors Intel, which offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD chip includes integrated Radeon 860M graphics, while the Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics, indicated by the "F" designation. The production status for both is active. AMD's release date is recorded as 2025-01-05, while Intel's is 2023-12-31.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core workloads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F is faster in most multi-core tests. It leads by 37.9% in Cinebench R23 multi-core, by 16.3% in Passmark multi-thread, and by 17.1% in data compression. The only multi-core exception is Cinebench R15, where AMD wins by 0.8%.

Q: How do the single-core performances compare?

A: Results are mixed. Intel wins Cinebench R15 single-core by 24.5% and Cinebench R23 single-core by 39.8%. However, the Passmark single-thread score is a virtual tie, with Intel at 3873 and AMD at 3872.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD also supports ECC memory, while Intel does not.

Q: Which chip has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 includes Radeon 860M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-14490F has no integrated graphics.

Q: How do their overall benchmark averages compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14490F averages 38149 across all benchmark tests, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 averages 35719. Intel ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, and AMD ranks in the 85th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Krackan Point codename, while the Intel Core i5-14490F uses Raptor Lake with the Raptor Lake-R codename. Process node differs significantly: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm from its own foundry. The die sizes are 195 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel.

Core count favors Intel at 10 cores versus AMD's 8 cores, though both provide 16 threads. Base clocks differ, with AMD at 2.00 GHz and Intel at 2.50 GHz. Both boost to 5.00 GHz. TDP is a major differentiator: AMD is rated at 28 watts, while Intel is rated at 65 watts. The sockets are incompatible (FP8 versus LGA 1700). L2 cache is 1 MB per core on AMD versus 1.25 MB per core on Intel. L3 cache is 8 MB on AMD versus 24 MB shared on Intel. Memory support includes LPDDR5X on AMD only, and DDR4 on Intel only. Memory bandwidth is recorded for AMD at 89.6 GB/s, with no figure for Intel. ECC support is present on AMD but absent on Intel. PCIe generation favors Intel (Gen 5 versus Gen 4), with both offering 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics exist only on AMD. The market segments differ: AMD is mobile, Intel is desktop. Release dates are 2025-01-05 for AMD and 2023-12-31 for Intel. Part numbers are 100-000000713 for AMD and SRN35 for Intel.

The Verdict

The data directs each processor toward a distinct use case based on measured performance. The Intel Core i5-14490F is the clear performance winner in the vast majority of recorded benchmarks. It holds advantages in Cinebench R23 multi-core (37.9%), Cinebench R23 single-core (39.8%), Cinebench R15 single-core (24.5%), Passmark physics (37%), Passmark prime numbers (33.6%), Passmark floating-point math (22.4%), Passmark data encryption (20.6%), Passmark data compression (17.1%), Passmark multi-thread (16.3%), Passmark random string sorting (12.7%), Passmark extended instructions (8.2%), and Passmark integer math (3.4%). Its higher average benchmark score of 38149 and 86th percentile ranking reinforce this position.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins only the Cinebench R15 multi-core test, by 0.8%, and ties in Passmark single-thread. Its strengths lie outside raw performance. It operates at a 28 watt TDP against Intel's 65 watts, making it suited to constrained thermal environments. It integrates Radeon 860M graphics, eliminating the need for a separate GPU in systems where that is relevant. It supports ECC memory and LPDDR5X, and its 4 nm TSMC process node is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14490F wins in scenarios that demand maximum compute throughput. The 37.9% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core makes it the stronger choice for rendering workloads. The 39.8% single-core advantage in the same suite indicates faster responsiveness in lightly threaded applications. The 37% lead in Passmark physics points to better simulation performance. Data compression, encryption, and floating-point math all favor Intel by margins between 8.2% and 22.4%, covering a broad range of productivity and scientific tasks. The 65 watt TDP and desktop socket indicate a system designed to sustain these workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins in efficiency and platform integration. Its 28 watt TDP is less than half of Intel's rating, making it appropriate for compact or mobile systems where heat and power draw are primary constraints. The integrated Radeon 860M graphics provide display output capability that the Intel chip lacks entirely. ECC memory support serves reliability-focused computing. The single Passmark single-thread tie shows that for certain common single-threaded operations, the two chips are effectively equal, allowing AMD to match Intel in that specific narrow metric while using significantly less power. The 0.8% Cinebench R15 multi-core win, while narrow, demonstrates that AMD can edge ahead in at least one legacy multi-core workload.