AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and the Intel Core 9 273PTE shows a split decision across the 15 recorded tests, with AMD taking 8 wins and Intel taking 7. The margins, however, are not evenly distributed. The Intel part wins by large double-digit margins in several heavy multi-threaded and physics workloads, while the AMD part counters with strong showings in data compression, extended instruction throughput, and single-threaded PassMark results.

The largest single margin in the entire comparison belongs to Intel in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test. The Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 20445 against 14278.5 for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, a 30.2% advantage. This result is consistent with the Intel chip's larger core and thread count, though the database only records the final scores, not the architectural cause. Cinebench R15 multi-core tells a different story: the AMD chip wins 2336.5 to 2060, a 13.4% lead. That reversal between two Cinebench versions is notable, as it suggests the AMD processor's performance advantage shrinks or reverses as the workload scales up in thread count and duration.

Single-core Cinebench results strongly favor Intel. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 2886 versus 1954 for AMD, a 32.3% lead. In Cinebench R15 single-core, Intel wins 290 to 247, a 14.8% margin. These are the widest single-core gaps in the dataset. The PassMark single-thread test, however, reverses that outcome: AMD scores 3872 and Intel scores 3433, giving AMD a 12.8% advantage. The difference between the Cinebench and PassMark single-thread results indicates that the two processors respond differently to workload characteristics, with Intel's advantage showing up in the Cinebench rendering path while AMD leads in the PassMark single-thread suite.

In PassMark math workloads, the results are mixed. Intel wins floating point math by 14.9% (60673 to 51639) and prime number finding by a massive 43% (142 to 81). AMD wins integer math by 3% (84868 to 82411) and extended instructions by 25.1% (19955 to 15952). The extended instruction margin is one of AMD's largest wins anywhere in the comparison. Data compression also goes to AMD by 8.9% (281834 to 258704), and random string sorting goes to AMD by 7.2% (31071 to 28973). Data encryption is nearly a tie, with AMD ahead by just 1.5% (14462 to 14253).

The multi-thread PassMark score is essentially a dead heat. Intel edges out AMD 24054 to 23994, a 0.2% difference that is well within normal run-to-run variation. The physics test goes to Intel by 31.2% (1917 to 1318), which is a substantial margin and one of Intel's larger wins in the PassMark suite.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PTE dominates in sustained, heavily threaded rendering workloads. The 30.2% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core is the clearest signal that the Intel part is better suited for long-duration all-core workloads like video rendering, 3D scene compilation, and other tasks that scale across all available threads. The physics test result, where Intel leads by 31.2%, reinforces that pattern. Physics simulation in PassMark tends to stress multi-threaded scheduling and raw throughput, and Intel's 12-core, 24-thread configuration delivers a decisive advantage there. Floating point math also goes to Intel by 14.9%, which matters for scientific computing and simulation workloads that rely heavily on FPU throughput.

Prime number finding is a clear Intel strength as well. The 43% margin (142 to 81) is the largest percentage gap in either direction across the entire benchmark set. This workload is highly sensitive to integer throughput per thread and the processor's ability to sustain high clocks, both of which favor the Intel design.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins in several areas that matter for everyday responsiveness and specific productivity tasks. The 12.8% lead in PassMark single-thread performance (3872 to 3433) suggests that lightweight, single-threaded tasks like web browsing, office document work, and general desktop responsiveness favor the AMD chip. The 25.1% lead in extended instructions is significant for workloads that use newer instruction set extensions, such as certain encryption, multimedia, and data processing libraries. Data compression, where AMD leads by 8.9%, points to an advantage in file archiving and database workloads that rely on compression algorithms. Random string sorting, a 7.2% AMD win, is another data-processing oriented task that goes to the AMD part.

The Cinebench R15 multi-core result, a 13.4% AMD win, stands out as an outlier when compared to the Cinebench R23 multi-core result. The database shows AMD winning the older, shorter R15 multi-core test while losing the newer R23 multi-core test by a wide margin. This suggests that the AMD processor performs relatively better in shorter multi-threaded bursts, while the Intel processor pulls ahead as the workload extends.

The Verdict

The benchmark data supports a clear split based on workload type. The Intel Core 9 273PTE is the stronger choice for sustained multi-core rendering and simulation workloads. Its 30.2% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 31.2% lead in physics, and 14.9% lead in floating point math give it a decisive edge for content creation, 3D rendering, and compute-heavy scientific tasks. The 43% margin in prime number finding further cements its position in integer-heavy throughput workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the better option for general responsiveness and data-processing tasks. Its 12.8% lead in PassMark single-thread performance, 25.1% lead in extended instructions, and 8.9% lead in data compression make it well suited for office productivity, software development, and workloads that rely on compression and modern instruction set support. The 13.4% win in Cinebench R15 multi-core also indicates that the AMD part handles shorter multi-threaded bursts well, which could benefit compile times and other interactive workloads.

The PassMark multi-thread score, with Intel ahead by only 0.2%, shows that the two processors are effectively tied in general multi-threaded throughput despite their very different core counts and power envelopes. The Intel part carries a TDP of 45 watts versus 28 watts for the AMD part, and the recorded data shows the Intel chip converting that additional power budget into substantial wins in specific workloads while failing to translate it into a meaningful PassMark multi-thread lead.

For buyers who prioritize rendering performance and physics simulation, the Intel Core 9 273PTE is the data-supported pick. For buyers who prioritize single-thread responsiveness, data compression, and extended instruction throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the better fit. The overall average benchmark score favors AMD at 35719 against 31143 for Intel, and the AMD part also holds a higher percentile ranking at 85 versus 82.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has an average benchmark score of 35719, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 31143. The AMD part also ranks at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, compared to the 82nd percentile for Intel.

Q: How large is the Intel lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE scores 20445 in Cinebench R23 multi-core against 14278.5 for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, a 30.2% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any multi-core benchmarks?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins Cinebench R15 multi-core with a score of 2336.5 versus 2060 for Intel, a 13.4% margin. The PassMark multi-thread score is effectively tied, with Intel ahead by just 0.2% (24054 to 23994).

Q: Which processor is faster in single-threaded workloads?

A: The answer depends on the benchmark. Intel wins Cinebench R23 single-core by 32.3% (2886 to 1954) and Cinebench R15 single-core by 14.8% (290 to 247). AMD wins PassMark single-thread by 12.8% (3872 to 3433).

Q: What is the largest percentage margin in either direction?

A: The largest margin is Intel's 43% lead in PassMark find prime numbers, with a score of 142 versus 81 for AMD.

Q: How do the two processors compare in data compression and encryption?

A: AMD leads in data compression by 8.9% (281834 to 258704) and in data encryption by 1.5% (14462 to 14253). Both are relatively modest margins compared to the larger swings seen in rendering and physics tests.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Krackan Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, and belongs to the Core 9 generation. The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which gives the AMD part a significant density and efficiency advantage on paper.

The core configurations differ sharply. The AMD chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel chip has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock at 5.50 GHz versus 5.00 GHz for AMD, though the AMD base clock is higher at 2.00 GHz versus 1.40 GHz for Intel. The TDP difference is notable: 28 watts for AMD versus 45 watts for Intel, reflecting the different market segments and process technologies.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD L2 is 1 MB per core, while the Intel L2 is 2 MB per core. The L3 configuration is very different: AMD has 8 MB total, while Intel has 36 MB shared. That 36 MB L3 is a major architectural advantage for Intel in workloads that benefit from large shared caches.

The memory support differs as well. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with identical recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe generations differ. AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses the Radeon 860M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

The sockets are entirely different. AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform socket, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. This aligns with the market segment data: AMD is listed as Mobile, while Intel is listed as Desktop. The release dates also differ, with AMD released on January 5, 2025, and Intel on March 8, 2026.

Specification Differences

The core count differs: 8 cores for AMD versus 12 cores for Intel. Thread counts follow: 16 for AMD versus 24 for Intel.

Clock speeds differ in both directions. AMD has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Intel has a base clock of 1.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

TDP differs by 17 watts: 28 watts for AMD versus 45 watts for Intel.

L2 cache differs: 1 MB per core for AMD versus 2 MB per core for Intel. L3 cache differs substantially: 8 MB for AMD versus 36 MB shared for Intel.

Process node differs: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The foundry also differs: TSMC for AMD versus Intel for Intel.

PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 for AMD versus Gen 5 for Intel.

Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 860M for AMD versus UHD Graphics 730 for Intel.

Socket differs: AMD Socket FP8 for AMD versus Intel Socket 1700 for Intel.

Market segment differs: Mobile for AMD versus Desktop for Intel.

Release date differs: January 5, 2025 for AMD versus March 8, 2026 for Intel.

The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $549. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The part numbers differ: 100-000000713 for AMD and SA4QJ for Intel. Both processors have locked multipliers. Both are listed as Active in production status. Both have the same L1 cache per core at 80 KB, the same dual-channel memory bus, the same memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s, and both support ECC memory.