AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350
Core 7 360
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Core 7 360
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and Intel Core 7 360 are both mobile processors, but the benchmark data reveals a stark performance gap. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins 12 of the 15 recorded head-to-head tests, establishing a commanding lead in most workloads. The Intel Core 7 360 secures only three wins, two of which are single-threaded PassMark tests and one in prime number calculation. The average benchmark score for the AMD processor is 35719, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel chip scores 18374, sitting at the 72nd percentile. This discrepancy in average scores, nearly double, sets the stage for a detailed comparison.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The most decisive victory for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 comes in PassMark integer math, where it scores 84868 against the Intel Core 7 360's 34238, a 147.9% advantage. This massive lead indicates a significant difference in raw computational throughput for integer-based tasks. Data compression follows a similar pattern, with the AMD chip scoring 281834 versus 142877, a 97.3% delta. The AMD processor also demonstrates superior performance in random string sorting, achieving 31071 to the Intel's 17636, a 76.2% difference.
In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD part shows a clear edge. Cinebench R15 multi-core results show the AMD processor scoring 2336.5 against the Intel's 1374, a 70.1% lead, while the PassMark multithread test shows a 54.4% advantage (23994 vs 15544). The AMD processor also wins in extended instructions (61.1%), data encryption (29.5%), Cinebench R15 single-core (28%), floating point math (14.8%), and physics (8.7%). The Cinebench R23 results are closer, with the AMD processor winning multi-core by 4.7% (14278.5 vs 13634) and single-core by 1.6% (1954 vs 1924), suggesting that in sustained rendering workloads, the gap narrows considerably.
The Intel Core 7 360's wins are confined to specific areas. It wins the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 4274 versus 3872, a 9.4% advantage, a result mirrored in the duplicate singlethread test. The Intel chip also wins the PassMark find prime numbers test, scoring 120 to the AMD's 81, a 32.5% difference. These wins indicate a strength in certain single-threaded integer operations and prime number generation, but they do not offset the AMD processor's dominance across the broader benchmark suite.
Architecture Differences
The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Krackan Point, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 7 360 uses the Wildcat Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process by Intel, with 6 cores and 6 threads, a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The lack of simultaneous multithreading on the Intel chip, indicated by its 6 threads for 6 cores, is a significant disadvantage in multi-threaded workloads.
Cache configurations also differ substantially. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. While the Intel chip has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, the AMD chip's larger L3 cache and higher core count contribute to its multi-threaded performance. Memory support is similar in type, with both supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but the AMD processor uses a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor uses a single-channel bus with a bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, which the Intel chip does not.
The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Radeon 860M, while the Intel Core 7 360 uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. PCIe support also varies, with the AMD processor offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel processor offers Gen 4 with 6 lanes. The AMD processor has a die size of 195 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. The TDP also differs, with the AMD chip rated at 28 W and the Intel chip at 15 W.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has an average benchmark score of 35719, while the Intel Core 7 360 has an average score of 18374.
Q: In which tests does the Intel Core 7 360 outperform the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350?
A: The Intel Core 7 360 wins the PassMark single-thread test (4274 vs 3872, a 9.4% advantage) and the PassMark find prime numbers test (120 vs 81, a 32.5% advantage).
Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads.
Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?
A: The AMD processor has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s with a dual-channel bus, while the Intel processor has a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s with a single-channel bus.
Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 360 is fabricated on a 3 nm process by Intel.
Q: What is the TDP of each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has a TDP of 28 W, and the Intel Core 7 360 has a TDP of 15 W.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ in several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The base clock of the AMD chip is 2.00 GHz, compared to 1.50 GHz for the Intel chip. The boost clock also differs, with the AMD chip reaching 5.00 GHz and the Intel chip reaching 4.80 GHz. The TDP is 28 W for the AMD part and 15 W for the Intel part. The socket types are different, with the AMD using AMD Socket FP8 and the Intel using Intel BGA 1516.
The process node and foundry differ, with the AMD chip using a 4 nm TSMC process and the Intel chip using a 3 nm Intel process. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core for the AMD chip and 192 KB per core for the Intel chip. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for the AMD chip and 2.5 MB per core for the Intel chip. The L3 cache is 8 MB for the AMD chip and 6 MB shared for the Intel chip. Memory bus is dual-channel for the AMD and single-channel for the Intel, with corresponding bandwidths of 89.6 GB/s and 59.7 GB/s. ECC memory support is present on the AMD chip but absent on the Intel chip. PCIe lanes are 16 for the AMD and 6 for the Intel, both Gen 4. The integrated graphics are Radeon 860M for the AMD and Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) for the Intel. The die size is 195 mm² for the AMD, with no recorded die size for the Intel. The release dates differ, with the AMD launching on 2025-01-05 and the Intel on 2026-04-15. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 7 360 is $426, while no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD processor.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the clear winner in multi-threaded and computationally intensive workloads. Its 147.9% lead in integer math and 97.3% lead in data compression make it the superior choice for tasks that rely on heavy arithmetic and data processing. The 54.4% advantage in the PassMark multithread test and the 70.1% lead in Cinebench R15 multi-core confirm its strength in parallel processing, making it more suitable for rendering, encoding, and other multi-core applications. The AMD chip also wins in floating-point math, extended instructions, and physics, further solidifying its position for general compute tasks.
The Intel Core 7 360 wins in the PassMark single-thread test, with a 9.4% advantage, and in find prime numbers, with a 32.5% advantage. These results indicate that the Intel chip has a strength in certain single-threaded integer operations, which could benefit lightly threaded applications that rely on prime number generation or specific single-core performance. However, its wins are limited to these specific tests, and it does not match the AMD processor in most other areas.
The Verdict
The data points to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 as the more capable processor overall. Its higher core count, support for simultaneous multithreading, dual-channel memory, and larger L3 cache contribute to its dominance in multi-threaded tests and its higher average benchmark score of 35719. The AMD processor also holds a substantial edge in data compression and integer math, making it the stronger option for productivity and computation-heavy workloads. Its 85th percentile ranking versus the Intel's 72nd percentile further underscores its overall performance advantage.
The Intel Core 7 360, with its higher single-thread PassMark score and prime number performance, offers a specific advantage in narrow single-threaded scenarios. Its lower TDP of 15 W also indicates a potential for more power-efficient operation, though the data does not include power consumption measurements. The Intel chip's launch MSRP is $426. Users requiring maximum multi-threaded throughput and diverse workload performance should choose the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. The Intel Core 7 360 is the pick only when its specific single-threaded strengths are the primary requirement.