AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Core 7 251E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and Intel Core 7 251E occupy very different positions in the database, and the recorded data makes that split clear. The AMD processor has a full suite of benchmark scores, while the Intel part currently has no recorded benchmark results. This means the head-to-head comparison is one-sided, but the available numbers still tell a meaningful story about where the AMD chip stands relative to its own performance class.

In Cinebench R23 multicore, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 14278.5 points. That result places it in a competitive tier among recent mobile processors. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1954 points shows strong per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly threaded workloads. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multicore score of 2336.5 and a single-core score of 247. These two tests together confirm that the AMD chip handles both parallel and single-threaded tasks without a major weakness in either direction.

PassMark results add more texture. The AMD chip delivers 84868 in integer math and 51639 in floating point math. Those numbers indicate solid arithmetic throughput for workloads like scientific computing or financial modeling. Data compression scores hit 281834, which is a strong result for file archiving and database workloads. Data encryption reaches 14462, showing competent cryptographic performance. Extended instructions score 19955, and random string sorting records 31071. The find prime numbers test returns 81, which is a lower score but not unexpected for a workload that stresses branch prediction and integer recursion.

The single-thread PassMark score is 3872, and the multithread score is 23994. Physics score is 1318. The average benchmark score for the AMD chip is 35719, placing it at the 85th percentile of all CPUs in the database. That percentile rank means the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 outperforms roughly 85 percent of recorded processors across all tests, not just within its immediate product tier.

The nearest rivals in the database help frame these numbers. The Intel Core 7 250H has an average score of 35728, which is essentially identical with a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H averages 35670, a 0.1 percent gap. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 averages 35802, which is 0.2 percent ahead of the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X averages 35909, a 0.5 percent lead. These are all very close margins, so the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 sits in a tight cluster where small test variance could flip the ordering.

Because the Intel Core 7 251E has no recorded benchmarks and no nearest rivals listed, there is no direct measured comparison available. The database shows the Intel chip at the 50th percentile, but with an average benchmark score of zero, that percentile is based on incomplete data. The analysis must therefore rely on the AMD chip's strong recorded performance and the architectural differences between the two processors.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Krackan Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 251E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The process node difference is significant: the AMD chip uses a more advanced fabrication technology, which typically allows for better power efficiency and higher transistor density.

The core counts differ dramatically. The AMD chip has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel chip has 24 cores and 32 threads. That is a 3x difference in core count and a 2x difference in thread count. However, the Intel chip's core configuration likely includes a mix of performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the exact breakdown. The AMD chip uses a unified Zen 5 design with 8 full cores.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 36 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has significantly more L3 cache, which can help with workloads that repeatedly access large datasets. The AMD chip has less L3 but compensates with higher core efficiency per clock.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. PCIe Gen 5 offers double the theoretical bandwidth per lane compared to Gen 4, which matters for high-end GPUs and NVMe storage.

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD chip uses the Radeon 860M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. The database does not record benchmark scores for either iGPU, so a direct comparison is not possible. The AMD Radeon 860M is generally positioned for more capable integrated graphics, but without measured data, that remains a qualitative observation.

The sockets are incompatible. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile platform. The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform. The market segments confirm this: the AMD chip is listed as Mobile, while the Intel chip is Desktop. The TDP values reflect that split: the AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel chip has a 65 W TDP. The Intel part draws more power and is designed for socketed desktop use, while the AMD part targets thin-and-light laptops.

Clock speeds also differ. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The Intel part has a higher boost ceiling, which helps in bursty single-threaded workloads if thermals allow. The AMD chip has a slightly lower base clock but a much lower TDP.

The release dates are close: the AMD chip released on January 5, 2025, and the Intel chip on January 12, 2025. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000000713, and the Intel part number is SRQDUQ657.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The AMD chip is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: How does the cache compare?

A: The AMD chip has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel chip has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip also has 2 MB of L2 per core versus 1 MB per core on the AMD chip.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 251E has a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and the Intel Core 7 251E support ECC memory.

Q: What are the TDP values?

A: The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 65 W.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Intel Core 7 251E |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 8 | 24 |

| Threads | 16 | 32 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Not specified |

| Codename | Krackan Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 860M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | Not available | $384 |

| Part Number | 100-000000713 | SRQDUQ657 |

Both processors share the same L1 cache size (80 KB per core), memory bus (dual-channel), memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s), ECC support (true), and multiplier unlock status (false). The L3 cache total, vCache, and transistor counts are not specified for either part.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins in scenarios that demand efficiency and portability. Its 28 W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where thermal headroom is limited. The 4 nm TSMC process provides a power efficiency advantage over the Intel chip's 10 nm process. The mobile market segment confirms that this chip targets battery-powered systems. Its recorded benchmark scores show strong multi-threaded performance for its class: the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 14278.5 and the PassMark multithread score of 23994 indicate that 8 cores at 5.00 GHz boost can handle demanding parallel workloads without requiring a desktop power budget.

The AMD chip also wins in single-threaded responsiveness relative to its power envelope. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1954 and PassMark single-thread score of 3872 demonstrate that the Zen 5 architecture delivers high per-core throughput. This makes the chip well-suited for everyday productivity, web browsing, and office applications where burst performance matters more than raw core counts.

The Intel Core 7 251E wins in scenarios that prioritize raw thread count and maximum cache capacity. With 24 cores and 32 threads, it has three times the core count of the AMD chip. For heavily parallel workloads such as video rendering, 3D simulation, or software compilation, the additional cores provide a theoretical throughput advantage, provided the workload scales linearly. The 36 MB of shared L3 cache is more than four times the AMD chip's 8 MB, which benefits workloads with large working sets that need frequent cache hits.

The Intel chip also wins on peak clock speed. Its 5.60 GHz boost clock exceeds the AMD chip's 5.00 GHz, giving it a potential edge in lightly threaded tasks that hit the boost ceiling. The PCIe Gen 5 support offers double the per-lane bandwidth of the AMD chip's PCIe Gen 4, which matters for systems with high-end discrete GPUs or fast NVMe drives. The desktop market segment and 65 W TDP indicate that the Intel chip is intended for systems with active cooling and a power supply that can sustain higher loads.

The Intel chip supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which gives system builders flexibility to use older, more available memory modules. The AMD chip only supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, which may require a newer platform investment.

In summary, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the choice for mobile systems where power draw and thermals are constraints, and its measured benchmarks show it performs well within that context. The Intel Core 7 251E is the choice for desktop systems where core count, cache size, and peak clock speeds matter more than efficiency, though its lack of recorded benchmarks means its performance is not yet validated in the database.