AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head measurements between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and the Intel Core 3 201TE. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor has a recorded win count in direct comparisons. This absence of direct data means the comparison must rely on the individual benchmark scores recorded for the AMD processor and the architectural specifications for the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has a complete set of benchmark results across multiple test suites. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it records a score of 14278.5 points, while its single-core result in the same test is 1954 points. The Cinebench R15 results show 2336.5 points multi-core and 247 points single-core. Passmark results include a multi-thread score of 23994, a single-thread score of 3872, integer math at 84868, floating point math at 51639, and extended instructions at 19955. Data compression scores 281834, data encryption scores 14462, and random string sorting scores 31071. Physics tests record 1318 points, and find prime numbers scores 81.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile ranking against all CPUs is 50. The AMD processor, by contrast, holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 35719, placing it in the same performance tier as several notable rivals. The nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core 7 250H with an average score of 35728 (a delta of 0 percent), the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H at 35670 (0.1 percent delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 at 35802 (-0.2 percent delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X at 35909 (-0.5 percent delta). These delta values indicate that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 sits within a half-percent of these four processors in average benchmark performance, effectively tying with all of them.

Without direct head-to-head results, the comparison between the two processors rests on the AMD part's measured performance and the Intel part's specifications. The AMD processor demonstrates strong multi-core capability with its 16 threads, and its single-core results in both Cinebench and Passmark indicate solid per-thread performance. The Intel Core 3 201TE, having no recorded scores, cannot be placed on the same performance scale from measured data alone.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ fundamentally in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Krackan Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename under the Core 3 generation, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry, with a die size of 163 mm².

Core and thread counts diverge significantly. The AMD processor offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor provides 4 cores and 8 threads. Clock speeds also differ: the AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, whereas the Intel part runs at 2.90 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost. The AMD processor's power envelope is lower at 28 W TDP compared to the Intel processor's 45 W TDP.

Cache hierarchies show distinct configurations. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core for the AMD part, while the Intel part uses 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache differs notably: the AMD processor has 8 MB, while the Intel processor has 12 MB shared. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation and lane count. The AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part includes Radeon 860M, and the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 730. The sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD processor and Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel processor. The market segments differ as well, with the AMD part classified as mobile and the Intel part as desktop. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 boosts to 5.00 GHz, and the Intel Core 3 201TE boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has a TDP of 45 W, compared to 28 W for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 and the Intel Core 3 201TE support ECC memory.

Q: What process nodes are used for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, and the Intel Core 3 201TE uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 MB of L3 cache, and the Intel Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | Intel Core 3 201TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Krackan Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 195 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 860M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | $134 |

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 holds clear advantages in measured performance. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide double the thread count of the Intel Core 3 201TE, which directly supports the AMD part's strong multi-core results. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14278.5 points and the Passmark multi-thread score of 23994 demonstrate substantial parallel processing capability. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz also exceeds the Intel part's 4.60 GHz, which contributes to the AMD processor's single-core results of 1954 in Cinebench R23 and 3872 in Passmark single-thread tests. The lower TDP of 28 W compared to 45 W indicates higher energy efficiency per unit of performance, and the higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s supports memory-intensive workloads. The 4 nm process node also represents a manufacturing advantage over the 10 nm node used by the Intel processor.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has no recorded benchmark scores, so its wins must be inferred from specifications. It offers a higher base clock of 2.90 GHz compared to 2.00 GHz, which can benefit lightly threaded workloads that do not reach boost states. The larger L3 cache of 12 MB shared versus 8 MB provides more on-chip storage for frequently accessed data. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes doubles the data transfer generation compared to the AMD part's Gen 4, which matters for devices that can utilize the higher bandwidth. The Intel processor also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, offering flexibility in memory selection. The die size of 163 mm² is smaller than the AMD part's 195 mm², and the market segment is desktop, which typically allows for different thermal and power delivery considerations. The launch MSRP is $134, though pricing comparisons are not part of this analysis.

The Verdict

The recorded data positions the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 as the stronger performer in measured benchmarks. Its 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, average benchmark score of 35719, and results that place it within 0.5 percent of processors like the Intel Core 7 250H, Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, and AMD Ryzen 7 7700X indicate a high-performance part. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 28 W TDP delivers substantial multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The 4 nm process node, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and Radeon 860M integrated graphics round out a capable mobile package.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, with no benchmark scores in the database, cannot be ranked against the AMD part from measured data. Its specifications show a 4-core, 8-thread desktop processor with a 2.90 GHz base clock, 4.60 GHz boost clock, 45 W TDP, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR4/DDR5 memory compatibility are notable specification advantages, and the UHD Graphics 730 provides integrated display output. The 50th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 0 reflect the absence of recorded performance data rather than a measured performance level.

For users selecting between these processors, the data supports the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 for workloads that benefit from higher core counts, higher boost clocks, and lower power consumption. The Intel Core 3 201TE suits scenarios where its higher base clock, larger L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, or DDR4 memory support are relevant. The absence of benchmark data for the Intel part means its performance characteristics remain unmeasured in this database, so the AMD processor's recorded results stand as the only directly quantified performance evidence available.