AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a direct comparison problem: the Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark entries in the database, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has a full suite of 15 test results. The head-to-head section is empty, and the win counts are zero for both processors. This means every performance statement below comes exclusively from the AMD side, with the Intel part left as a known quantity only through its specifications.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 delivers an average benchmark score of 35,719 across all recorded tests. That places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its closest rival, the Intel Core 7 250H, scores nearly identically at 35,728, a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H trails by just 0.1 percent at 35,670. Two AMD desktop parts, the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and Ryzen 7 7700X, sit 0.2 percent and 0.5 percent behind respectively. The practical takeaway is that the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 lands in a tight performance cluster where single-digit percentage differences separate it from several established processors.

Looking at specific workload scores, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 shows a strong profile. In Cinebench R23, it records 14,278.5 for multi-core and 1,954 for single-core. The older Cinebench R15 run shows 2,336.5 multi-core and 247 single-core. PassMark tests reveal where the chip concentrates its strength. Integer math scores 84,868, floating-point math scores 51,639, and extended instructions score 19,955. Data compression hits 281,834, while data encryption reaches 14,462. Random string sorting scores 31,071, and the find prime numbers test records 81. The multi-thread PassMark total is 23,994, with physics at 1,318 and single-thread performance at 3,872.

The Intel Arc G3 has no measured scores to compare. Its percentile rating of 50 comes from its position in the database, but that is not backed by any benchmark entries. The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 0, which reflects the absence of recorded tests rather than actual performance. Without head-to-head data, the only meaningful comparisons are architectural and specification based, which the later sections cover.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear choice only if the buyer needs measured performance right now. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 15 recorded benchmark results, a verified 85th percentile ranking, and an average score of 35,719. The Intel Arc G3 has zero recorded results and sits at the 50th percentile by database position, which is not a performance claim. Any decision between these two comes down to whether the Intel part can match or beat the AMD chip, and the database cannot confirm that.

For multi-threaded productivity, the AMD part shows a robust profile. Its 8 cores and 16 threads drive a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,278.5 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 23,994. For single-thread work, the 5.00 GHz boost clock supports a 1,954 Cinebench R23 single-core result. The Intel Arc G3 offers 14 cores but only 14 threads, which means no hyper-threading equivalent. That structural difference suggests the Intel part may not match the AMD chip in heavily threaded tasks, but without benchmark data, that remains inference.

The Intel Arc G3 does bring a newer process node at 3 nm versus AMD's 4 nm, and it has a higher memory bandwidth figure at 136.5 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. Those specifications could translate to advantages in memory-bound workloads, but the database has no scores to verify that. The verdict is straightforward: if the buyer requires verified performance numbers, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is the only option with data. If the buyer is willing to accept unverified potential, the Intel part's specifications are the only guide.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins in every measured category because it is the only part with measurements. Its 8 Zen 5 cores with 16 threads give it a clear multi-threading advantage. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14,278.5 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 23,994 indicate strong parallel workload handling. The single-thread score of 1,954 in Cinebench R23 also shows capable per-core performance, supported by the 5.00 GHz boost clock.

The Intel Arc G3 has no wins in the database, but its specifications point to potential strengths. The 14 cores at 14 threads suggest a wide physical core layout, even without simultaneous multi-threading. The 3 nm process node from Intel Foundry could offer efficiency gains. The memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s is notably higher than the AMD part's 89.6 GB/s, which could benefit tasks that stream large datasets. The L3 cache of 18 MB shared is also larger than the AMD's 8 MB. These are theoretical advantages only.

For use-case splitting, the AMD part suits workloads that benefit from simultaneous multi-threading and verified performance, such as rendering, compilation, and encryption tasks. The data encryption score of 14,462 and data compression score of 281,834 confirm these strengths. The Intel part might suit memory-heavy workloads or scenarios where its 3 nm efficiency and higher bandwidth matter, but the database cannot confirm real-world results.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has an average benchmark score of 35,719. The Intel Arc G3 has an average benchmark score of 0, because no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its nearest rival is the Intel Core 7 250H with an average score of 35,728, a delta of 0 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H scores 35,670, which is 0.1 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 scores 35,802, which is 0.2 percent ahead, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X scores 35,909, which is 0.5 percent ahead.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for both parts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Arc G3 has a memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Arc G3 uses a 3 nm process from Intel.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 support ECC memory?

A: No, the Intel Arc G3 does not support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 does support ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Krackan Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake codename and belongs to the Arc G3 generation. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The Intel part has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The Intel cache design is larger at every level, which could improve hit rates for certain workloads.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports only LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The Intel part has a higher memory bandwidth at 136.5 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. The AMD part supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU. The Intel part uses Gen 5 with 4 lanes for the CPU. The Intel part's newer PCIe generation offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the AMD part provides more lanes.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD part includes a Radeon 860M, while the Intel part includes an Arc B370. Both are mobile processors with active production status. The AMD part was released on January 5, 2025, while the Intel part has a release date of May 27, 2026.

Specification Differences

The core counts differ: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads. The AMD part has simultaneous multi-threading, the Intel part does not.

Clock speeds differ slightly. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The AMD part is 0.10 GHz higher at base and 0.40 GHz higher at boost.

Thermal design power differs by 3 watts. The AMD part has a TDP of 28, while the Intel part has a TDP of 25. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 2540.

Memory support differs: the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports only LPDDR5X. ECC support is present on the AMD part and absent on the Intel part. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 136.5 GB/s for Intel.

PCIe specifications differ: the AMD part has Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel part has Gen 5 with 4 lanes. The process node differs: 4 nm for AMD at TSMC, 3 nm for Intel at Intel Foundry. The die size is 195 mm² for AMD, with no recorded die size for Intel.

The L1 cache is 80 KB per core for AMD and 192 KB per core for Intel. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2.5 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 18 MB shared for Intel. The integrated graphics are Radeon 860M for AMD and Arc B370 for Intel.

The part numbers are 100-000000713 for AMD and SA4QZ for Intel. Both processors are mobile market segments with active production status. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database, and both have locked multipliers.