AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Xeon w3-2525 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon w3-2525

CORE STATE Sapphire Rapids
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 22.5 MB
MAX TDP 175W
ARCHITECTURE Sapphire Rapids
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,713
2,430
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
215
342
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,316
24,117
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,038
3,404
passmark_data_compression
315,906
341,629
passmark_data_encryption
16,247
17,086
passmark_extended_instructions
22,400
27,882
passmark_find_prime_numbers
89
129
passmark_floating_point_math
54,447
68,230
passmark_integer_math
88,531
83,806
passmark_multithread
26,350
28,373
passmark_physics
1,578
1,901
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,648
34,933
passmark_single_thread
3,901
3,426
passmark_singlethread
3,901
3,426
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,129
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,429

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Xeon w3-2525

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data reveals a clear split between these two processors, with the Intel Xeon w3-2525 winning 10 of the 15 recorded head-to-head tests, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 takes 5 victories. The most dramatic difference appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Xeon leads by a massive 40.1% margin (3404 vs 2038). This is not a small gap; it represents a fundamental difference in how each chip handles lightly threaded workloads.

The Intel part continues its dominance in Cinebench R23 multi-core, scoring 24117 against the AMD's 18316, a 24.1% advantage. This pattern repeats in PassMark physics, where the Xeon leads by 17% (1901 vs 1578), and in extended instructions, where it is 19.7% ahead (27882 vs 22400). The Xeon also wins in floating-point math by 20.2% (68230 vs 54447) and in prime number finding by 31% (129 vs 89). These are all compute-heavy workloads, and the Intel chip clearly has the edge in raw number crunching.

However, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is not without its own victories. The most notable one is in PassMark single-thread performance, where it leads by 13.9% (3901 vs 3426). This is a counterintuitive result given the Xeon's massive lead in Cinebench R23 single-core, but it shows that the two benchmark suites measure different aspects of single-threaded performance. The AMD also wins in integer math by 5.6% (88531 vs 83762), in random string sorting by 2% (35648 vs 34933), and in Cinebench R15 multi-core by 11.6% (2713 vs 2430). The R15 multi-core result is interesting because the Xeon wins the newer R23 multi-core by a large margin, suggesting that the AMD's architecture scales differently across benchmark versions.

The overall average benchmark scores are close: the AMD sits at 39485, the Intel at 38392, a difference of about 2.8% in favor of the AMD. This is why the Intel's percentile rank of 86 is only slightly below the AMD's 87. Neither chip is a clear overall winner; they are optimized for different types of workloads. The AMD wins in some specific integer and memory latency-sensitive tasks, while the Intel dominates in floating-point, physics, and the latest Cinebench versions. The data clearly shows that the Intel Xeon w3-2525 is the stronger processor for heavy multithreaded compute, but the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 holds its own and surpasses it in several everyday desktop tasks.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Xeon w3-2525 uses the Sapphire Rapids architecture, also its codename, on a 10 nm process by Intel. This process node difference likely explains the significant power consumption gap, with the AMD rated at 28W TDP and the Intel at 175W TDP, a 6.25x difference.

Both have 8 cores and 16 threads, but their cache hierarchies differ. The AMD has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel has 2 MB of L2 per core and 22.5 MB of L3 cache. The larger L2 and L3 caches on the Intel should help in cache-heavy workloads, which is supported by its strong performance in the PassMark extended instructions and floating-point tests. The AMD's smaller L3 cache may be a factor in its lower scores in those areas.

Memory support is another major difference. The AMD supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel supports only DDR5 but over a quad-channel bus, giving it 140.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Xeon's higher memory bandwidth (140.8 vs 89.6 GB/s) is a 57% advantage, which likely contributes to its lead in memory-intensive benchmarks.

The platforms also diverge on expansion and graphics. The AMD uses a PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 CPU lanes and includes integrated Radeon 860M graphics. The Intel uses PCIe Gen 5 with 64 lanes and has no integrated graphics. The Intel's 64 PCIe Gen 5 lanes are a huge advantage for workstation expansion, supporting more storage, accelerators, or networking cards. The AMD's integrated graphics is a clear feature for mobile and lightweight systems. Both support ECC memory, which is important for workstation reliability.

The Verdict

The data points to two very different target audiences. The Intel Xeon w3-2525 is the processor for heavy, compute-intensive tasks. Its wins in Cinebench R33 multi-core, floating-point math, and extended instructions make it the clear choice for rendering, scientific simulation, and code compilation. Its 10 nm node and 175W TDP suggest it is designed for a workstation with robust cooling and power delivery. The Intel part's lack of integrated graphics means a dedicated GPU is mandatory, but its 64 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide ample expansion for multiple GPUs or NVMe drives.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is a mobile processor, as indicated by its socket and 28W TDP. It is the better choice for battery-powered systems where power efficiency is critical. It wins in single-threaded PassMark and integer math, which are common in everyday applications like web browsing, office work, and coding. Its integrated Radeon 860M graphics means it can handle display output without a dGPU, and its dual-channel memory support is sufficient for most laptops.

In summary, the Intel Xeon w3-2525 is the workstation and server chip, excelling in multithreaded and floating-point compute. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is a mobile processor, excelling in power efficiency and single-threaded integer tasks. The Intel wins more tests, but that does not make it the better chip for everyone. The AMD's performance in single-threaded PassMark and its low power envelope make it the better fit for a laptop. The Xeon's massive memory bandwidth and cache make it the better fit for a node.

Specification Differences

The differences in specifications are stark, and they explain the performance results. The most obvious difference is TDP: 28W for the AMD versus 175W for the Intel. This is a 6.5x difference and is the primary reason the AMD is a mobile processor and the Intel is a workstation processor. The clock speeds also differ significantly. The AMD has a lower base clock of 2.00 GHz but a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel has a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz but a lower boost of 4.50 GHz. This means the Intel maintains higher sustained performance, while the AMD can spike higher for short bursts.

The process node is a major architectural difference: 4 nm for AMD's TSMC-built chip versus 10 nm for Intel's own. The cache sizes differ as shown above, with Intel having a larger L3 (22.5 MB vs 8 MB) and larger L2 (2 MB vs 1 MB per core). Memory support also diverges, with AMD offering both DDR5 and LPDDR5X over dual-channel, and Intel offering only DDR5 over quad-channel. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 140.8 GB/s for Intel. The PCIe version and lanes are also different: Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD, and Gen 5 with 64 lanes for Intel.

The integrated graphics are present on the AMD (Radeon 860M) but absent on the Intel. Both support ECC memory, which is a point of parity. The sockets are different: Socket FP8 for AMD and Socket 4677 for Intel. The release dates are also different, with the Intel released in August 2024 and the AMD in January 2026. The Intel has a launch MSRP of $609; the AMD has no listed launch MSRP. The AMD has a larger die size of 195 mm², while the Intel's die size is not listed. The AMD's part number is 100-000001868, and the Intel's is SRN4J.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Xeon w3-2525 is faster, scoring 24117 versus the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450's 18316, a 24.1% advantage.

Q: Which processor has better single-threaded performance?

A: It depends on the benchmark. The Intel wins Cinebench R23 single-core by 40.1% (3404 vs 2038), but the AMD wins PassMark single-thread by 13.9% (3901 vs 3426).

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Xeon w3-2525 supports quad-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 140.8 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 supports dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it has an integrated Radeon 860M. The Intel Xeon w3-2525 has no integrated graphics.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The Intel Xeon w3-2525 has 64 lanes of PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 16 lanes of PCIe Gen 4.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has a TDP of 28W, and the Intel Xeon w3-2525 has a TDP of 175W.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 450
w3-2525
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
3.5 +75.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.5 -11.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2
3.5 +75.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.5 -11.8%
Multiplier
20
35 +75.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
22.5 MB
Power
TDP (W)
28
175 +525.0%
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Sapphire Rapids
Codename
Gorgon Point
Sapphire Rapids
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Xeon W (Sapphire Rapids)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
195 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Quad-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
140.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 4677
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 64 Lanes(CPU only)
DMI
—
4.0 x8
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
—
Other
Market
Mobile
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$609
Part Number
100-000001868
SRN4J
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
—
View Ryzen AI 7 450 Details View Xeon w3-2525 Details