AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
Core i5-110
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Core i5-110
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and the Intel Core i5-110. The head-to-head comparison field is empty, and the Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. As a result, the analysis must rely on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450's recorded performance data and the architectural specifications of both processors.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 shows strong measured performance across multiple workloads. In Cinebench R23, it records a multi-core score of 18,316 and a single-core score of 2,038. In Cinebench R15, the multi-core result is 2,713 and single-core is 215. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 26,350, a single-thread score of 3,901, integer math at 88,531, floating point math at 54,447, and data compression at 315,906.
The Intel Core i5-110 has no benchmark entries, so no score comparisons are possible. The data indicates the Ryzen AI 7 450 sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Core i5-110 is at the 50th percentile. The Ryzen AI 7 450's average benchmark score is 39,485, placing it near rivals such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (39,603, a 0.3% deficit), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS (39,325, a 0.4% lead), the AMD EPYC 4245P (39,215, a 0.7% lead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D (39,768, a 0.7% deficit).
Without direct measurements for the Intel part, the recorded data cannot confirm any specific win for either processor in a head-to-head test.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has recorded wins across all benchmark categories where data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,316 indicates strong parallel processing capability, while the single-core score of 2,038 shows solid per-thread performance. The PassMark integer math score of 88,531 and floating point score of 54,447 suggest well-rounded arithmetic throughput. Data compression at 315,906 and random string sorting at 35,648 point to strong memory and data handling performance. The encryption score of 16,247 and extended instructions score of 22,400 round out the measured workload coverage.
The Intel Core i5-110 has no benchmark data in the database, so no wins can be attributed to it from recorded measurements. The data shows the Ryzen AI 7 450 outperforms the 50th percentile position of the Core i5-110 based on its 87th percentile ranking, but specific workload wins for the Intel processor cannot be established from available facts.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). It is built on a 4 nm process from TSMC with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core i5-110 uses the Comet Lake architecture, also its codename, part of the Core i5 (Comet Lake) generation, manufactured on Intel's 14 nm process.
Core and thread counts differ significantly. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor has 6 cores and 12 threads. Cache layouts also diverge: the AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The Intel part has 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3.
Clock speeds show different profiles. The AMD part has a 2.00 GHz base clock and a 5.10 GHz boost clock. The Intel part has a higher 2.90 GHz base clock but a lower 4.30 GHz boost clock. Thermal design power differs substantially: the AMD processor is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel processor is rated at 65 watts.
Memory support separates the two. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC memory support. The Intel processor supports DDR4 over a dual-channel bus with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC support. PCIe generations also differ: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only).
Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD processor includes a Radeon 860M, while the Intel processor includes UHD Graphics 630. The market segments diverge: the AMD part is mobile, while the Intel part is desktop. Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1200. The AMD part released on 2026-01-04, while the Intel part released on 2025-09-10.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads.
Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The AMD processor also has a lower base clock at 2.00 GHz versus 2.90 GHz for the Intel part.
Q: How do the process nodes compare?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel Core i5-110 is built on Intel's 14 nm process.
Q: Which processor supports faster memory?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC. The Intel Core i5-110 supports DDR4 with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC.
Q: What is the TDP rating for each?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-110 is rated at 65 watts.
Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-110 ranks at the 50th percentile.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | Intel Core i5-110 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cores | 8 | 6 |
| Threads | 16 | 12 |
| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.90 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.30 GHz |
| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |
| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Architecture | Zen 5 | Comet Lake |
| Process node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| L1 cache (per core) | 80 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache (per core) | 1 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4 |
| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 42.7 GB/s |
| ECC memory | Yes | No |
| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |
| Integrated graphics | Radeon 860M | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |
| Release date | 2026-01-04 | 2025-09-10 |
The Intel Core i5-110 has a launch MSRP of $200, which is stated once here for reference.
The Verdict
The recorded data shows a clear separation between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 delivers substantially higher benchmark scores across all measured categories, with a multi-core Cinebench R23 result of 18,316 and a multi-thread PassMark score of 26,350. It ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, placing it near the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS and above the AMD EPYC 4245P in average benchmark score.
The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores, and its 50th percentile ranking indicates a mid-pack position. Its architectural data shows a higher base clock, but lower boost clock, fewer cores, and a larger process node. The higher 65 watt TDP suggests a different power envelope, while the AMD processor operates at 28 watts.
For users prioritizing measured multi-threaded performance, process efficiency, modern memory support, and integrated graphics capability, the data favors the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450. For users requiring a desktop platform with DDR4 support, a higher base clock, and a lower initial release date, the Intel Core i5-110 has those attributes, but no benchmark data confirms its performance level.
The AMD processor's mobile segment, 4 nm process, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth contrast with the Intel processor's desktop segment, 14 nm process, and 42.7 GB/s bandwidth. The L3 cache difference favors the Intel part at 12 MB shared versus 8 MB, but the per-core L2 cache favors the AMD part at 1 MB versus 256 KB. The Ryzen AI 7 450 also supports ECC memory, which the Core i5-110 does not.
The verdict from the data: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is the higher-performing processor based on recorded benchmarks and architectural advantages. The Intel Core i5-110 offers a distinct platform with a different socket, memory type, and market positioning, but lacks any measured performance data in the database to support a performance claim.