AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-14600

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,713
3,070
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
215
433
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,316
30,464
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,038
4,300
passmark_data_compression
315,906
434,620
passmark_data_encryption
16,247
25,082
passmark_extended_instructions
22,400
25,674
passmark_find_prime_numbers
89
155
passmark_floating_point_math
54,447
85,759
passmark_integer_math
88,531
117,078
passmark_multithread
26,350
35,848
passmark_physics
1,578
2,330
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,648
48,043
passmark_single_thread
3,901
4,167
passmark_singlethread
3,901
4,167
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
12,794
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,806
geekbench_multicore
N/A
14,680
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,424

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Core i5-14600

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear picture: the Intel Core i5-14600 wins all 15 recorded head-to-head comparisons. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 does not secure a single victory in any of the shared tests. This is not a close contest in any individual metric, though the margin varies significantly across workloads.

The largest gap appears in the Cinebench R23 single-core test. The Intel chip scores 4300 against the AMD's 2038, a delta of -52.6% for the Ryzen. The R15 single-core result follows a similar pattern, with Intel at 433 and AMD at 215, a -50.3% difference. These results indicate that the Intel architecture holds a substantial advantage in lightly threaded tasks.

Multi-core performance tells the same story, but with a slightly smaller gap. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 30464 versus AMD's 18316, a -39.9% delta. The R15 multi-core test shows Intel at 3070 and AMD at 2713, a narrower -11.6% margin. The multi-core gap narrows in the older benchmark, but Intel still leads by a meaningful amount.

The PassMark suite reinforces the Intel advantage across a broad range of workloads. Integer math shows Intel at 117078 versus AMD's 88531, a -24.4% delta. Floating point math shows Intel at 85759 against 54447, a -36.5% gap. Data encryption favors Intel at 25082 versus 16247, a -35.2% delta. Data compression shows Intel at 434620 against 315906, a -27.3% difference. Prime number finding shows Intel at 155 versus 89, a -42.6% gap. Extended instructions show Intel at 25674 against 22400, a -12.8% delta. Random string sorting favors Intel at 48043 versus 35648, a -25.8% difference.

The PassMark multi-thread test shows Intel at 35848 against AMD's 26350, a -26.5% delta. Physics simulation shows Intel at 2330 versus 1578, a -32.3% gap. The single-thread PassMark tests show the smallest margin, with Intel at 4167 and AMD at 3901, a -6.4% delta. This single-thread result is notable because it contradicts the much larger gaps seen in the Cinebench single-core tests, suggesting the two processors are closer in certain single-threaded workloads than others.

The overall database average benchmark score confirms the hierarchy. The Intel Core i5-14600 records an average score of 44889, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 records 39485. The Intel part sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD part sits in the 87th percentile. The Intel chip's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-12900KS (average score 45094, delta -0.5%) and the AMD EPYC 4344P (45122, -0.5%). The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (39603, -0.3%) and the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D (39768, -0.7%). These placement details show that each processor competes in a distinct performance tier despite the head-to-head sweep.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies and market segments. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

The core counts differ substantially. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part has 14 cores and 20 threads. The additional physical cores and threads on the Intel side help explain its multi-core benchmark advantage. The AMD part's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part runs a base clock of 2.70 GHz and boosts to 5.20 GHz. The Intel chip holds a small boost clock advantage and a significant base clock advantage.

Cache configurations also differ. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip's larger L3 cache and doubled per-core L2 cache support its stronger performance in cache-sensitive workloads.

The platform targets differ completely. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile socket. Its market segment is listed as Mobile. The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Intel Socket 1700 and is a desktop part. The power envelopes reflect this split: the AMD part has a TDP of 28, while the Intel part has a TDP of 65. The AMD part also has a die size of 195 mm², while the Intel part measures 257 mm².

Memory support differs in type and bandwidth. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, and the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs by generation: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part uses the Radeon 860M. The Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part has a production status of Active and a release date of 2026-01-04. The Intel part is also Active, with a release date of 2024-01-07. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000001868; the Intel part number is SRN44.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 wins every single-core benchmark in the head-to-head data. Cinebench R23 single-core shows Intel at 4300 versus AMD's 2038, a -52.6% delta. Cinebench R15 single-core shows Intel at 433 versus 215, a -50.3% delta. PassMark single-thread shows a smaller margin, Intel at 4167 versus 3901, a -6.4% delta.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?

A: The gap varies by benchmark. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows Intel at 30464 versus AMD's 18316, a -39.9% delta. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows Intel at 3070 versus AMD's 2713, a -11.6% delta. PassMark multi-thread shows Intel at 35848 versus 26350, a -26.5% delta.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has an average benchmark score of 44889, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has an average score of 39485. The Intel part ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, and the AMD part ranks in the 87th percentile.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The database lists ECC memory support as true for both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and the Intel Core i5-14600.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel part also has a larger L3 cache at 24 MB shared, compared to 8 MB on the AMD part.

Q: Are these processors in the same market segment?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is a mobile processor using the AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core i5-14600 is a desktop processor using the Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part has a TDP of 28, while the Intel part has a TDP of 65.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two processors in the database records.

  • Cores: AMD 8, Intel 14
  • Threads: AMD 16, Intel 20
  • Base clock: AMD 2.00 GHz, Intel 2.70 GHz
  • Boost clock: AMD 5.10 GHz, Intel 5.20 GHz
  • TDP: AMD 28, Intel 65
  • Socket: AMD Socket FP8, Intel Socket 1700
  • Architecture: Zen 5, Raptor Lake
  • Codename: Gorgon Point, Raptor Lake-R
  • Generation: Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
  • Process node: 4 nm, 10 nm
  • Foundry: TSMC, Intel
  • Die size: 195 mm², 257 mm²
  • L2 cache: 1 MB per core, 2 MB per core
  • L3 cache: 8 MB, 24 MB shared
  • Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X versus DDR4, DDR5
  • Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s, not recorded
  • PCIe: Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only), Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only)
  • Integrated graphics: Radeon 860M, UHD Graphics 770
  • Market segment: Mobile, Desktop
  • Release date: 2026-01-04, 2024-01-07
  • Part number: 100-000001868, SRN44
  • Launch MSRP: not recorded for AMD, $255 for Intel

Where Each One Wins

The data does not show any benchmark category where the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 wins. Every recorded head-to-head test favors the Intel Core i5-14600. The practical interpretation is that the Intel part wins across all tested workload types, including single-threaded, multi-threaded, integer math, floating point math, encryption, compression, physics, and extended instructions.

The AMD part's closest showing appears in the PassMark single-thread tests, where it trails by only -6.4%. This is the smallest margin in the entire data set. The AMD part also keeps the R15 multi-core gap relatively narrow at -11.6%, which is the second smallest margin. These two results suggest that the AMD processor is most competitive in older or lighter workload patterns, where the architectural differences matter less.

The Intel part shows its largest advantages in Cinebench R23 single-core (-52.6%) and R15 single-core (-50.3%). These are the tests that most heavily favor the Intel architecture's higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz and its larger cache configuration. The Intel part also shows a strong edge in prime number finding (-42.6%), which is a workload that benefits from the combination of more cores and higher per-core performance.

For the AMD side, the realistic use case is the mobile platform. The Ryzen AI 7 450 operates at a 28 TDP, uses LPDDR5X memory, and fits the AMD Socket FP8. These characteristics point to thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency and platform integration matter more than raw throughput. The Intel part, with its 65 TDP and Socket 1700, belongs in desktop builds where power draw and cooling capacity are less constrained.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows a decisive performance advantage for the Intel Core i5-14600. It wins every head-to-head benchmark, holds a higher average benchmark score (44889 versus 39485), and ranks higher in the overall percentile distribution (89th versus 87th). The Intel part delivers more cores, more threads, a higher base clock, a slightly higher boost clock, and a larger L3 cache. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i9-12900KS and the AMD EPYC 4344P, which places it in a performance class well above the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 cannot match the Intel part in any measured workload. Its closest margins appear in PassMark single-thread (-6.4%) and Cinebench R15 multi-core (-11.6%), but it still loses both. The AMD processor's advantages are platform-level rather than performance-level: a smaller die (195 mm² versus 257 mm²), a lower TDP (28 versus 65), LPDDR5X memory support, a 4 nm process node, and a mobile socket. These traits suit a laptop environment, but the benchmark data does not show any performance scenario where the AMD part pulls ahead.

The choice between the two depends on platform. The Intel Core i5-14600 is the stronger processor in every recorded benchmark and targets desktop systems. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 targets mobile systems and trades performance for a lower power envelope and a more compact platform. Anyone comparing these two strictly on performance should select the Intel part. Anyone constrained to a mobile platform has no choice but the AMD part, and the data shows it will deliver noticeably lower throughput in both single-core and multi-core workloads.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 450
i5-14600
Core Specs
Cores
8
14 +75.0%
Threads
16
20 +25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.2 +2.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.7 +35.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.2 +2.0%
Multiplier
20
27 +35.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
154 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
195 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
2000 MHz up to 3.9 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$255
Part Number
100-000001868
SRN44
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
—
None
View Ryzen AI 7 450 Details View Core i5-14600 Details