AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Processor U300L Comparison

The database comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and the Intel Processor U300L is one-sided in measured performance. The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 39485 and sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel part has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and the recorded win counts are 0 for both parts. Because the Intel part has no benchmark scores, this analysis relies on the AMD part's recorded results and on the specification and architecture fields.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head section contains no direct entries for this pairing. The win counters are 0 for the AMD side and 0 for the Intel side. The Intel Processor U300L has no benchmark scores in the database, so there is no Intel result to place against any AMD result. Every measured comparison is therefore one-sided.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 records a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18316 and a Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 2038. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 2713 and the singlecore score is 215. PassMark results include multithread 26350, single thread 3901, integer math 88531, floating point math 54447, extended instructions 22400, data compression 315906, data encryption 16247, physics 1578, random string sorting 35648, and find prime numbers 89.

The average benchmark score of 39485 places the AMD part in a tight cluster of nearest rivals. The rival average scores are 39603 for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, 39325 for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, 39215 for the AMD EPYC 4245P, and 39768 for the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D. The delta values are 0.3% below the 8840HS, 0.4% above the 8845HS, 0.7% above the EPYC 4245P, and 0.7% below the 9800X3D. These small deltas show that the AMD part's recorded average sits between those four processors. No nearest rivals are recorded for the Intel part. The AMD part's percentile of 87 and the Intel part's percentile of 50 give a broad ranking context, but the Intel percentile has no benchmark scores behind it.

FAQ

Q: What is the recorded average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has an average benchmark score of 39485. The Intel Processor U300L has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How do core and thread counts differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor U300L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor U300L does not.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor U300L supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What are the process node and foundry for each part?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor U300L uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: How close is the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 to its nearest rivals?

A: It is 0.3% below the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, 0.4% above the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, 0.7% above the AMD EPYC 4245P, and 0.7% below the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

The Verdict

The recorded data produces one measured winner. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18316, a Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 2038, and a PassMark multithread score of 26350. The Intel Processor U300L has no recorded benchmark scores and an average benchmark score of 0. For any workload represented by the recorded benchmark list, the AMD part is the only side with evidence.

The Intel part does carry a lower TDP of 15 versus 28 and supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5. Those are specification differences, not benchmark wins. A benchmark-driven selection picks the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450. A specification-driven selection would need to decide whether the Intel part's lower TDP and DDR4 support outweigh the AMD part's 8 cores, 16 threads, ECC support, and recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part's 50th percentile is lower than the AMD part's 87th, but the Intel part's average benchmark score of 0 means the percentile is not backed by recorded benchmark entries.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | Intel Processor U300L |

| Cores | 8 | 5 |

| Threads | 16 | 6 |

| Base clock | 2.00 | 1.20 |

| Boost clock | 5.10 | 4.40 |

| TDP | 28 | 15 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 195 mm² | not recorded |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | not recorded |

| ECC memory | true | false |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 860M | UHD Graphics 48EU |

| Release date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-04-07 |

| Launch MSRP | not recorded | $107 |

| Part number | 100-000001868 | SRPEKSRPEM |

The table excludes fields that are identical in the database: L1 cache 80 KB per core, L3 cache 8 MB, dual-channel memory bus, mobile market segment, active production status, and locked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The architecture split is substantial. AMD uses Zen 5 with the codename Gorgon Point and the generation string Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). Intel uses Raptor Lake with the codename Raptor Lake-PS and the generation string Intel Processor (Raptor Lake). The generation fields also differ: the AMD part's string explicitly lists two Zen variants, while the Intel part's string lists a single Raptor Lake family. The process node is 4 nm at TSMC for AMD and 10 nm at Intel for the Intel part. The core arrangement differs: AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads, while Intel has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Cache organization is partly shared. Both parts list 80 KB of L1 per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. The L2 cache differs: AMD uses 1 MB per core, Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The integrated graphics also differ: AMD pairs the CPU with Radeon 860M, Intel with UHD Graphics 48EU. Memory support separates the two as well. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory enabled. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, has no recorded memory bandwidth, and does not enable ECC. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 on both, but AMD exposes 16 CPU lanes and Intel exposes 8 CPU lanes. AMD's die size is 195 mm²; Intel's die size is not recorded. The sockets are AMD Socket FP8 and Intel Socket 1700.

Where Each One Wins

Every recorded benchmark score in this comparison belongs to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450. The Intel Processor U300L has no recorded benchmark scores, so no measured workload can be assigned to it. The AMD part's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18316 and PassMark multithread score of 26350 support multi-threaded productivity workloads. The Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 2038 and PassMark single thread score of 3901 support single-thread responsiveness. The PassMark data compression score of 315906, integer math score of 88531, floating point math score of 54447, extended instructions score of 22400, data encryption score of 16247, physics score of 1578, random string sorting score of 35648, and find prime numbers score of 89 cover a broad set of compute tasks. In every one of those categories, the AMD part is the only side with recorded data.

The Intel part's recorded attributes are not benchmark wins. Its lower TDP of 15 versus 28 and its dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 support are specification-level facts. The database does not record performance scores for the Intel part, so a use-case split based on measured wins cannot include it. The architecture differences and specification differences explain why the measured side of this comparison is entirely AMD.