AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and the Intel Processor 300T. The recorded measurements for the AMD part are extensive, spanning Cinebench and PassMark workloads, while the Intel Processor 300T has no benchmark entries in the database. This asymmetry means the comparison must rely entirely on the AMD chip’s recorded scores and the Intel part’s absence of measured data.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,316 and a single-core score of 2,038. In Cinebench R15, it records 2,713 multi-core and 215 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 26,350, single-thread of 3,901, integer math at 88,531, floating-point math at 54,447, and extended instructions at 22,400. Data compression reaches 315,906, data encryption 16,247, random string sorting 35,648, find prime numbers 89, and physics 1,578.

The Intel Processor 300T shows no benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. Without measurable results, no direct numeric comparison can be drawn for any specific workload. The AMD part’s percentile versus all CPUs is 87, placing it well above the Intel chip’s 50th percentile standing in the overall distribution of recorded processors.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450’s nearest rivals in the database, based on average benchmark score, are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS at 39,603 (a -0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS at 39,325 (+0.4%), the AMD EPYC 4245P at 39,215 (+0.7%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D at 39,768 (-0.7%). The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450’s own average benchmark score is 39,485. These deltas are small, indicating the Ryzen AI 7 450 sits in a tightly clustered performance band around these four processors. The Intel Processor 300T has no nearest rivals listed, reinforcing its lack of recorded benchmark data.

Because the head-to-head benchmark array is empty, the database provides no measured wins for either processor. The AMD part’s raw scores stand alone as the only quantitative performance evidence available. The Intel chip’s lack of data means any claim about its relative speed would be unsupported by the database. The practical takeaway is that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has a full suite of recorded results, while the Intel Processor 300T has none, so the numeric story belongs entirely to the AMD side.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the database, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is the only processor with measurable performance data. Its average benchmark score of 39,485 and 87th percentile among all CPUs indicate a capable part. The Intel Processor 300T holds a 50th percentile and an average score of 0, which reflects the absence of recorded benchmarks rather than a literal performance of zero. The data cannot confirm any performance advantage for the Intel chip because no measurements exist.

For users who rely on benchmark-derived comparisons, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is the only defensible choice. Its recorded scores span single-thread, multi-thread, and specialized workloads, giving a concrete profile. The Intel Processor 300T offers no such evidence. The AMD part also carries an active production status, an 8-core/16-thread configuration, and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, all of which are documented. The Intel chip has 2 cores and 4 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and no boost clock listed.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 delivers measurable performance across every recorded test, while the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded performance to compare. Any selection between the two should favor the AMD part if benchmark evidence matters. The Intel chip’s only quantitative distinction in the database is its launch MSRP of $82, but pricing is not a performance metric and does not appear in the benchmark records.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 wins in every benchmark category that has recorded data, simply because the Intel Processor 300T has none. In single-thread workloads, the AMD chip records a PassMark single-thread score of 3,901 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,038. For multi-thread tasks, it records 26,350 in PassMark multi-thread and 18,316 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Specialized workloads show data compression at 315,906, encryption at 16,247, and extended instructions at 22,400.

The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded wins in any category. The database lists its average benchmark score as 0 and its percentile as 50, but these figures reflect missing measurements, not a measured defeat. In terms of use-case splitting, the AMD part’s scores cover both lightly threaded and heavily threaded scenarios. The 8-core/16-thread design supports parallel workloads, while the 5.10 GHz boost clock supports single-thread responsiveness. The Intel chip’s 2-core/4-thread layout and 3.40 GHz base clock provide no recorded evidence for either use case.

The AMD part also wins on architecture-specific metrics. It uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with 8 MB of L3 cache and 1 MB of L2 per core. The Intel Processor 300T uses Raptor Lake on Intel’s 10 nm process, with 6 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB of L2 per core. These differences appear in the specification records, but without Intel benchmark data, they cannot be translated into performance outcomes.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has an average benchmark score of 39,485. The Intel Processor 300T has an average benchmark score of 0, which indicates no recorded benchmarks.

Q: What is the core and thread count for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300T have any recorded benchmark results?

A: No. Its benchmark array is empty, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor among all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is in the 87th percentile. The Intel Processor 300T is in the 50th percentile.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has no boost clock listed in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-S, from the Intel Processor generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 163 mm².

Cache layouts differ between the two. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip’s L3 is not marked as shared, while the Intel chip’s L3 is explicitly shared. Neither has 3D V-Cache.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with dual-channel memory and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel memory, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded, and ECC memory is not supported.

PCIe capabilities differ. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD chip uses Radeon 860M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 710. The AMD part’s socket is AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has a TDP of 28 and a production status of Active, with a release date of 2026-01-04. The Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 and a production status of Active, with a release date of 2024-01-07. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $82, while the AMD chip has no launch MSRP recorded. The AMD part’s part number is 100-000001868, and the Intel part’s part number is SRN3K.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded fields. Core counts: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks: the AMD chip runs at 2.00 GHz, and the Intel chip at 3.40 GHz. Boost clocks: the AMD chip reaches 5.10 GHz, while the Intel chip has no boost clock listed. TDP: the AMD chip is 28, and the Intel chip is 35.

Sockets differ: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. Architecture and codename differ: Zen 5 and Gorgon Point versus Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake-S. Process nodes differ: 4 nm at TSMC versus 10 nm at Intel. Die sizes differ: 195 mm² versus 163 mm². L2 cache per core differs: 1 MB versus 1.25 MB. L3 cache differs: 8 MB versus 6 MB shared.

Memory support differs: DDR5 and LPDDR5X versus DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded for the AMD chip at 89.6 GB/s, but no value exists for the Intel chip. ECC support differs: the AMD chip supports it, the Intel chip does not. PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 versus Gen 5. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 860M versus UHD Graphics 710.

Market segment differs: Mobile versus Desktop. Release dates differ: 2026-01-04 versus 2024-01-07. Launch MSRP is recorded for the Intel chip at $82, but not for the AMD chip. The AMD part’s generation is Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), while the Intel part’s generation is Intel Processor (Raptor Lake). Both have locked multipliers and active production status. The AMD part’s memory bus is dual-channel, and the Intel part’s memory bus is dual-channel. The AMD part’s part number is 100-000001868, and the Intel part’s part number is SRN3K.