AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450
Processor 300
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Processor 300
# AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Processor 300
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and Intel Processor 300 occupy different corners of the processor market, and the recorded data shows a decisive performance gap. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is a mobile-focused 8-core processor based on Zen 5 architecture, while the Intel Processor 300 is a desktop-oriented 2-core chip built on Raptor Lake. The database shows the Ryzen AI 7 450 sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Processor 300 lands at the 50th percentile. The Ryzen AI 7 450 has an average benchmark score of 39485, whereas the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct numerical comparisons to the AMD chip's absolute results and its nearest rivals.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, so the analysis relies on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450's recorded scores and its position against comparable chips. The Ryzen AI 7 450 delivers 18316 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 2038 points in Cinebench R23 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2713 multi-core and 215 single-core. PassMark results show 26350 in multithread, 3901 in single-thread, 88531 in integer math, 54447 in floating point math, 22400 in extended instructions, 315906 in data compression, 16247 in data encryption, 35648 in random string sorting, 89 in find prime numbers, and 1578 in physics.
Since the Intel Processor 300 has zero benchmark scores in the database, the head-to-head comparison is limited to architectural and specification differences. The Ryzen AI 7 450's nearest rivals provide context for its performance level. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS by 0.3 percent, with that rival scoring 39603 on average. It leads the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by 0.4 percent, as that chip averages 39325. The AMD EPYC 4245P sits 0.7 percent behind the Ryzen AI 7 450 with an average of 39215, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D leads by 0.7 percent with 39768. These margins are small, indicating the Ryzen AI 7 450 performs competitively within its immediate peer group.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 wins decisively in core count and thread count, offering 8 cores and 16 threads versus the Intel Processor 300's 2 cores and 4 threads. This translates directly into multi-threaded workloads where parallel execution matters. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18316 reflects strong sustained multi-thread performance. PassMark multithread at 26350 and integer math at 88531 reinforce this advantage for productivity tasks such as compiling, rendering, and data processing.
The Intel Processor 300 counters with a higher base clock of 3.90 GHz, compared to the Ryzen AI 7 450's 2.00 GHz base clock. This gives the Intel chip an advantage in lightly threaded tasks that rely on raw clock speed without boost behavior, though the Ryzen AI 7 450's boost clock of 5.10 GHz exceeds any sustained Intel frequency. The Intel Processor 300 also uses the Intel Socket 1700 platform, which supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving desktop builders flexibility in memory selection. The Ryzen AI 7 450 is limited to DDR5 and LPDDR5X, which may be a consideration for users with existing DDR4 memory.
The Intel Processor 300 has a 46 W TDP versus the Ryzen AI 7 450's 28 W TDP. The lower TDP of the AMD chip indicates better power efficiency for the performance delivered, which is important for mobile applications. The Ryzen AI 7 450 also supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor 300 does not, giving the AMD chip an edge in reliability-sensitive workloads.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.
Q: What are the clock speed differences?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and no recorded boost clock in the database.
Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300 does not.
Q: What is the thermal design power for each chip?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel Processor 300 has a TDP of 46 W.
Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Processor 300 ranks at the 50th percentile.
Q: What memory types does each processor support?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Processor 300 supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 uses 2 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD chip and 3.90 GHz for the Intel chip, with only the AMD chip listing a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. TDP ratings show 28 W for the AMD chip and 46 W for the Intel chip.
The socket platforms are completely different: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Processor 300 uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip supports a dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, whereas the Intel chip supports dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 with no bandwidth figure recorded. ECC memory support is present on the AMD chip and absent on the Intel chip.
PCIe capabilities differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Processor 300 provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are the Radeon 860M for the AMD chip and UHD Graphics 710 for the Intel chip. Market segments are mobile for the AMD chip and desktop for the Intel chip. The release dates show the Intel Processor 300 launched in January 2024, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 launched in January 2026. The Intel Processor 300 has a launch MSRP of $82. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has no recorded launch MSRP.
Architecture Differences
The architectural divide is substantial. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 uses Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Processor 300 uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-S codename, part of the Intel Processor generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel with a die size of 163 mm².
Cache layouts differ between the two. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Processor 300 also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip's larger L3 cache and greater core count give it more aggregate cache for multi-threaded workloads.
The process node advantage belongs to the AMD chip, with 4 nm versus 10 nm, which contributes to its lower TDP of 28 W despite offering four times the cores. The foundry difference is notable: TSMC fabricates the AMD chip, while Intel fabricates its own processor. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either platform.
The Verdict
The data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 for users who need multi-threaded performance. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and 8 MB of L3 cache, deliver benchmark results that place it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18316 and PassMark multithread score of 26350 indicate strong capability for parallel workloads. The 28 W TDP also makes it suitable for mobile systems where power efficiency matters, and ECC memory support adds reliability for workstation use.
The Intel Processor 300 serves a different purpose. Its 2 cores and 4 threads with a 3.90 GHz base clock are suited to basic desktop tasks, and the Intel Socket 1700 platform with DDR4 and DDR5 support offers memory flexibility. The 46 W TDP is higher than the AMD chip despite far fewer cores, reflecting the older 10 nm process. The 50th percentile ranking places it at the midpoint of the CPU performance distribution, which aligns with its entry-level positioning.
Given the lack of recorded benchmark scores for the Intel Processor 300, direct performance claims cannot be made from the database. However, the architectural and specification gaps are substantial. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 offers four times the cores, double the threads, a smaller process node, lower TDP, ECC support, and higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Processor 300 counters with a higher base clock, PCIe Gen 5 support, DDR4 compatibility, and a lower launch MSRP of $82. Users prioritizing multi-threaded performance and efficiency should select the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450. Users needing a simple, low-cost desktop processor with flexible memory support should consider the Intel Processor 300.