AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 225F

CORE STATE Arrow Lake-S
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 10 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 4.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 20 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Arrow Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,713
2,660
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
215
287
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,316
16,467
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,038
1,893
passmark_data_compression
315,906
310,843
passmark_data_encryption
16,247
22,648
passmark_extended_instructions
22,400
28,027
passmark_find_prime_numbers
89
352
passmark_floating_point_math
54,447
92,554
passmark_integer_math
88,531
66,417
passmark_multithread
26,350
31,004
passmark_physics
1,578
2,430
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,648
37,325
passmark_single_thread
3,901
4,397
passmark_singlethread
3,901
4,397
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
11,059
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,561

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

Benchmark records place the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and Intel Core Ultra 5 225F in a close overall class with very different strengths. The AMD part is a mobile Zen 5 processor with 8 cores, 16 threads, a 5.10 GHz boost clock, and a 28 W TDP. The Intel part is a desktop Arrow Lake processor with 10 cores, 10 threads, a 4.90 GHz boost clock, and a 65 W TDP. In the head-to-head dataset, Intel wins 10 tests and AMD wins 5, yet AMD holds the higher average benchmark score (39485 vs 37313) and the higher percentile ranking (87th vs 85th).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: Intel has 10 cores and 10 threads. AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which CPU wins Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: AMD, 18316 vs 16467, an 11.2 percent lead.

Q: What is the largest head-to-head margin?

A: Intel's PassMark find prime numbers win: 352 vs 89, a -74.7 percent delta.

Q: Does either CPU lead all single-thread tests?

A: No. Intel leads PassMark single-thread 4397 vs 3901, but AMD leads Cinebench R23 single-core 2038 vs 1893, a 7.7 percent delta.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: Only AMD, with a Radeon 860M. Intel lists N/A.

Q: How do the two parts rank overall?

A: AMD is at the 87th percentile with an average score of 39485. Intel is at the 85th percentile with an average score of 37313.

Architecture Differences

The core designs differ in architecture, process node, cache layout, and platform support. AMD uses Zen 5 with the Gorgon Point codename, from the Ryzen AI 400 generation (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), on a 4 nm TSMC process with a 195 mm² die. Intel uses Arrow Lake with the Arrow Lake-S codename, from the Core Ultra Series 2 generation, on a 3 nm TSMC process with a 243 mm² die and 17,800 million transistors.

Core and cache organization differs. AMD has 8 cores, 16 threads, 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3. Intel has 10 cores, 10 threads, 192 KB L1 per core, 3 MB L2 per core, and 20 MB shared L3. The Intel part therefore has more cores and larger caches per core, while the AMD part has more threads.

Platform features separate them further. AMD is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8, with a 28 W TDP, DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory support, 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, and a Radeon 860M. Intel is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1851, with a 65 W TDP, DDR5 memory, 102.4 GB/s bandwidth, no ECC support, PCIe Gen 5 with 20 CPU lanes, and no integrated graphics.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head record favors Intel by volume: 10 wins to 5. AMD's strongest result is PassMark integer math: 88531 vs 66417, a 33.3 percent lead. AMD also wins Cinebench R23 multi-core (18316 vs 16467, 11.2 percent), Cinebench R23 single-core (2038 vs 1893, 7.7 percent), Cinebench R15 multi-core (2713 vs 2660, 2.0 percent), and PassMark data compression (315906 vs 310843, 1.6 percent).

Intel's largest win is PassMark find prime numbers: 352 vs 89, a -74.7 percent delta. Intel also leads PassMark floating point math (92554 vs 54447, -41.2 percent), PassMark physics (2430 vs 1578, -35.1 percent), PassMark data encryption (22648 vs 16247, -28.3 percent), PassMark extended instructions (28027 vs 22400, -20.1 percent), PassMark multithread (31004 vs 26350, -15.0 percent), PassMark random string sorting (37325 vs 35648, -4.5 percent), Cinebench R15 single-core (287 vs 215, -25.1 percent), and PassMark single-thread (4397 vs 3901, -11.3 percent). The database records PassMark single_thread and singlethread as the same score.

The Verdict

Overall ranking favors AMD. Its average benchmark score of 39485 places it at the 87th percentile. In its nearest rival set, it trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS by 0.3 percent, leads the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS by 0.4 percent, leads the AMD EPYC 4245P by 0.7 percent, and trails the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D by 0.7 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225F, at 37313 and the 85th percentile, trails the Intel Core i9-13900HK by 0.3 percent and leads the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H by 0.4 percent, the Intel Core i7-13700 by 0.5 percent, and the AMD Ryzen 7 160 by 0.5 percent.

The data supports a split verdict. For workloads following Cinebench R23, integer math, and data compression, the AMD part is the stronger selection. For workloads following PassMark multithread, floating-point math, encryption, extended instructions, prime-number finding, physics, and single-thread tests, the Intel part is the stronger selection. AMD supplies the only integrated GPU and the lower TDP (28 W vs 65 W). Intel supplies the higher base clock (3.30 GHz vs 2.00 GHz), larger L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB), and higher memory bandwidth (102.4 GB/s vs 89.6 GB/s).

Specification Differences

| Parameter | AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Not listed | Core Ultra Series 2 |

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 10 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1851 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Arrow Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Arrow Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Transistors | Not listed | 17,800 million |

| Die size | 195 mm² | 243 mm² |

| L1 cache | 80 KB per core | 192 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 3 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 20 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 102.4 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 860M | N/A |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-01-04 | 2025-01-06 |

The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $231.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 wins:

  • Cinebench R23 multi-core: 18316 vs 16467
  • Cinebench R23 single-core: 2038 vs 1893
  • Cinebench R15 multi-core: 2713 vs 2660
  • PassMark integer math: 88531 vs 66417
  • PassMark data compression: 315906 vs 310843

These wins cover the Cinebench suite and PassMark integer math and compression tests. The AMD part also lists the only integrated GPU (Radeon 860M), ECC memory support, and the lower TDP.

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F wins:

  • PassMark multithread: 31004 vs 26350
  • PassMark floating point math: 92554 vs 54447
  • PassMark find prime numbers: 352 vs 89
  • PassMark physics: 2430 vs 1578
  • PassMark data encryption: 22648 vs 16247
  • PassMark extended instructions: 28027 vs 22400
  • PassMark random string sorting: 37325 vs 35648
  • Cinebench R15 single-core: 287 vs 215
  • PassMark single-thread: 4397 vs 3901

These wins cover floating-point math, encryption, extended instructions, physics, and single-thread performance. Intel also carries the larger L3 cache, higher base clock, higher memory bandwidth, and PCIe Gen 5 support.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 450
Ultra 5 225F
Core Specs
Cores
8
10 +25.0%
Threads
16
10 -37.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
3.3 +65.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Frequency (GHz)
2
3.3 +65.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.9 -3.9%
Multiplier
20
33 +65.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
20 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
121 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Arrow Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Arrow Lake-S
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Transistors
—
17,800 million
Die Size
195 mm²
243 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
102.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1851
Chipsets
—
Z890, B860, W880, Q870, H810
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz up to 4.4 GHz
P-Core Turbo
—
4.7 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
—
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$231
Part Number
100-000001868
SRQD2SRVF9
Package
FP8
FC-LGA18W
Tj Max
100°C
105°C
View Ryzen AI 7 450 Details View Core Ultra 5 225F Details