AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Core i9-14901E Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 450

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i9-14901E

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.8 Base / 5.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 36 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,713
2,595
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
215
366
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,316
25,753
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,038
3,635
passmark_data_compression
315,906
288,777
passmark_data_encryption
16,247
18,571
passmark_extended_instructions
22,400
17,249
passmark_find_prime_numbers
89
189
passmark_floating_point_math
54,447
81,089
passmark_integer_math
88,531
112,736
passmark_multithread
26,350
30,298
passmark_physics
1,578
3,041
passmark_random_string_sorting
35,648
39,138
passmark_single_thread
3,901
4,354
passmark_singlethread
3,901
4,354
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,816
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,526

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Core i9-14901E

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a clear split: the Intel Core i9-14901E wins the majority of measured workloads, taking 12 of the 15 comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 holds three decisive wins. The most dramatic Intel advantage appears in single-core Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 3635 against AMD's 2038, a 43.9% lead. The Cinebench R15 single-core result is even starker, with Intel at 366 versus AMD's 215, a 41.3% gap. These are the largest deltas recorded in either direction across the entire comparison.

Multi-core Cinebench tells a different story depending on the benchmark version. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel leads with 25753 against 18316, a 28.9% margin. However, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD takes the win with 2713 versus Intel's 2595, a 4.5% advantage. This reversal suggests the older R15 workload responds differently to the two architectures than the newer R23 test.

AMD's three wins are concentrated in specialized workloads. The data compression test shows AMD at 315906 versus Intel's 288777, a 9.4% lead. Extended instructions deliver AMD's largest win at 22400 against 17249, a 29.9% margin. These two victories indicate a meaningful advantage in specific instruction-heavy and compression-oriented tasks. The third AMD win is the aforementioned Cinebench R15 multi-core result.

Intel's remaining victories span a wide range of compute patterns. PassMark integer math shows Intel at 112736 versus AMD's 88531, a 21.5% edge. Floating point math goes to Intel by an even larger margin: 81089 against 54447, a 32.9% difference. Prime number finding favors Intel heavily, 189 versus 89, a 52.9% margin that represents the largest relative gap in the entire dataset. Physics simulation also leans Intel, with 3041 against 1578, a 48.1% lead.

Other Intel wins are narrower but consistent. Data encryption shows Intel at 18571 versus AMD's 16247, a 12.5% margin. PassMark multithread gives Intel 30298 against 26350, a 13% advantage. Random string sorting sees Intel at 39138 versus AMD's 35648, an 8.9% edge. Single-thread PassMark results put Intel at 4354 versus AMD's 3901, a 10.4% lead.

The average benchmark scores place the two processors close together overall. AMD's average is 39485, while Intel's is 37911. AMD's percentile ranking against all CPUs is 87, one point ahead of Intel's 86. The nearest rival data reinforces this proximity: AMD's closest competitor, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, scores 39603 and trails AMD by only 0.3%. Intel's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, scores 37904 and is statistically even with Intel at a 0% delta.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally in silicon design. AMD uses a Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a die size of 195 mm². Intel uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process, with a die size of 257 mm². Both parts have 8 cores and 16 threads, but the underlying implementations differ substantially.

Cache hierarchies show notable differences. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel provides 2 MB per core. The L3 cache gap is large: AMD has 8 MB total, while Intel has 36 MB shared. This four-and-a-half-fold difference in L3 capacity likely contributes to Intel's strength in workloads that benefit from larger resident data sets.

Clock speeds favor Intel in both base and boost operation. AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost of 5.10 GHz. Intel's base clock is 2.80 GHz with a boost of 5.60 GHz. The higher base clock and higher boost clock give Intel a raw frequency advantage across the operating range.

Thermal design power differs significantly. AMD is rated at 28 W TDP, while Intel is rated at 65 W TDP. This more than doubles Intel's power envelope, which aligns with its higher clocks and larger die. Market positioning reflects this: AMD is a mobile processor on Socket FP8, while Intel is a desktop processor on Socket 1700.

Memory support shows different strategies. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe generation differs. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives Intel a generational advantage in available I/O bandwidth. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon 860M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Release timing and production status are recorded. AMD's release date is January 4, 2026, and its codename is Gorgon Point within the Ryzen AI 400 generation (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). Intel's release date is June 30, 2024, and its codename is Raptor Lake-R within the Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. Both are listed as Active in production.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has an average benchmark score of 39485, while the Intel Core i9-14901E has 37911. AMD also holds a higher percentile rank at 87 versus Intel's 86.

Q: How large is Intel's single-core advantage?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel leads by 43.9% (3635 versus 2038). In Cinebench R15 single-core, Intel leads by 41.3% (366 versus 215). PassMark single-thread shows a narrower 10.4% Intel lead (4354 versus 3901).

Q: Does AMD win any benchmark categories?

A: AMD wins three of the 15 head-to-head comparisons: Cinebench R15 multi-core (2713 versus 2595, a 4.5% lead), PassMark data compression (315906 versus 288777, a 9.4% lead), and PassMark extended instructions (22400 versus 17249, a 29.9% lead).

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity?

A: Intel has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while AMD has 8 MB. Intel's L2 cache is also larger at 2 MB per core versus AMD's 1 MB per core.

Q: How do the thermal envelopes compare?

A: AMD is rated at 28 W TDP, while Intel is rated at 65 W TDP. Intel's higher power envelope corresponds to its higher base clock (2.80 GHz versus 2.00 GHz) and higher boost clock (5.60 GHz versus 5.10 GHz).

Q: Are both processors memory-flexible?

A: Both support ECC memory and dual-channel configurations. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database.

The Verdict

The data describes two processors with different priorities. The Intel Core i9-14901E is the stronger choice for single-threaded performance, with margins between 10.4% and 43.9% across the three single-core benchmarks in the dataset. Its multi-core results are also generally ahead, particularly in Cinebench R23 where it leads by 28.9%, and in PassMark multithread where it leads by 13%. The Intel part also dominates in math-heavy workloads: floating point math (32.9% ahead), integer math (21.5% ahead), prime number finding (52.9% ahead), and physics simulation (48.1% ahead). These results align with its higher clocks, larger caches, and 65 W TDP envelope.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is the choice for specific workload types. Its 29.9% lead in extended instructions and 9.4% lead in data compression indicate strengths in instruction-extension-heavy code and compression pipelines. Its Cinebench R15 multi-core win, while modest at 4.5%, shows that not all multi-threaded workloads favor Intel. The AMD part also achieves these results at 28 W TDP, which is less than half of Intel's 65 W rating. The average benchmark score favors AMD by 1574 points (39485 versus 37911), and its nearest rivals cluster within 0.7%, indicating tight competition at that performance tier.

For users prioritizing peak single-thread performance, high-clock multi-thread workloads, and math computation, the Intel Core i9-14901E delivers the stronger measured results. For users prioritizing compression, extended instruction sets, and power efficiency, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 provides the better fit. The overall average scores are close, but the workload-specific deltas are large enough to make the choice dependent on application mix.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | Intel Core i9-14901E |

|---|---|---|

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.80 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 195 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 36 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 860M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part number | 100-000001868 | Q49ESRNJH |

Both processors share 8 cores, 16 threads, 80 KB L1 cache per core, dual-channel memory bus, ECC memory support, locked multipliers, and Active production status. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 450
i9-14901E
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.8 +40.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.6 +9.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.8 +40.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.6 +9.8%
Multiplier
20
28 +40.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
36 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
195 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001868
Q49ESRNJH
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
—
None
View Ryzen AI 7 450 Details View Core i9-14901E Details