AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 and the Intel Core 3 304 are both mobile processors aimed at thin-and-light laptops, but the benchmark data shows they occupy very different performance tiers. The AMD part is built around an 8-core, 16-thread configuration, while the Intel part uses a 5-core, 5-thread setup. Across the recorded head-to-head tests, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 won 14 of 15 comparisons, leaving the Intel Core 3 304 with a single victory. The data indicates a clear split: the Intel chip holds an advantage in one specific legacy single-core test, while the AMD chip dominates in nearly every other workload, particularly in multi-threaded and compute-heavy scenarios.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results split the two processors along predictable lines, based on core counts and clock behavior. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 wins in all multi-threaded workloads, including Cinebench R15 multi-core, Cinebench R23 multi-core, and the entire PassMark multithread suite. The data shows a massive advantage in integer math, where the AMD chip scores 88,531 against Intel's 24,640, a 259.3% delta. Similarly, in data compression, the AMD part reaches 315,906 versus 114,775, a 175.2% lead. These results indicate the AMD processor is the choice for compiling code, rendering, running virtual machines, or any task that scales with thread count.

The Intel Core 3 304 wins exactly one test: Cinebench R15 single-core, with a score of 264 against AMD's 215, an 18.6% advantage. This is the only metric where the Intel chip leads, and it is notable because it is an older benchmark. In newer single-core tests, the AMD processor takes the lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, AMD scores 2,038 versus Intel's 1,765, a 15.5% delta. In PassMark single-thread, AMD scores 3,901 versus 3,614, a 7.9% delta. Therefore, the Intel chip's win appears isolated to legacy software, while the AMD chip holds the single-core crown in modern workloads.

The AMD processor also wins in memory-sensitive tasks, despite the Intel part's higher single-core score in one test. The AMD chip leads in random string sorting by 161%, floating-point math by 83.2%, and physics by 81.8%. These results suggest the AMD part is more balanced across different instruction types, while the Intel chip only manages a narrow lead in a single legacy test. For users running modern applications, the data consistently favors the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 304 win any benchmark?

A: Yes, it wins Cinebench R15 single-core with a score of 264, compared to AMD's 215, a 18.6% advantage.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 18,316 against Intel's 5,263, a 248% delta. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the delta is 219.6%.

Q: What is the difference in single-thread performance in modern tests?

A: In Cinebench R23 single-core, AMD scores 2,038 versus Intel's 1,765, a 15.5% delta. In PassMark single-thread, AMD scores 3,901 versus 3,614, a 7.9% delta.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 3 304 has a memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s.

Q: What is the total number of benchmark wins for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 wins 14 head-to-head tests. The Intel Core 3 304 wins 1 head-to-head test.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 18,316 against Intel's 5,263, a 248% delta. This is followed by PassMark integer math, where AMD scores 88,531 versus 24,640, a 259.3% delta, the highest percentage difference in the entire dataset. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD part scores 2,713 against 849, a 219.6% delta. These three tests show the AMD chip delivering more than triple the performance in some cases, driven by its higher core count, 16 threads versus 5, and higher base and boost clocks.

The Intel Core 3 304's only win is in Cinebench R15 single-core, with a score of 264 against AMD's 215. This 18.6% delta is the only instance where the Intel chip leads, and it is importantly the AMD chip's boost clock is 5.10 GHz versus Intel's 4.30 GHz, yet the Intel chip still wins this specific test. This could be attributed to the older benchmark's sensitivity to per-core efficiency, but the data does not specify architectural reasons.

In other compute tests, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 shows consistent but smaller leads. In PassMark extended instructions, AMD scores 22,400 against 9,686, a 131.3% delta. In PassMark multithread, AMD scores 26,350 against 11,625, a 126.7% delta. In PassMark random string sorting, AMD scores 35,648 against 13,659, a 161% delta. In PassMark data encryption, AMD scores 16,247 against 8,501, a 91.1% delta. In PassMark floating-point math, AMD scores 54,447 against 29,722, an 83.2% delta. In PassMark physics, AMD scores 1,578 against 868, an 81.8% delta. In PassMark find prime numbers, AMD scores 89 against 68, a 30.9% delta.

The single-thread comparison is closer than the multi-thread results. In PassMark single-thread, AMD scores 3,901 versus Intel's 3,614, a 7.9% delta. In Cinebench R23 single-core, AMD scores 2,038 versus 1,765, a 15.5% delta. The only single-core test where Intel wins is the R15 variant, which indicates a divergence between legacy and modern single-core metrics. The data shows the AMD chip is faster in both modern single-core tests and all multi-thread tests, with the Intel chip only ahead in the older R15 single-core benchmark.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several fundamental specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads. The base clock is 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.50 GHz for Intel. The boost clock is 5.10 GHz for AMD and 4.30 GHz for Intel. The thermal design power is 28 watts for AMD and 15 watts for Intel.

Memory support also diverges. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but the AMD chip uses a dual-channel memory bus, while the Intel chip uses a single-channel bus. This results in a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 59.7 GB/s for Intel. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not.

PCIe lane counts differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 3 304 provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are also different: AMD uses Radeon 860M, while Intel uses Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe). The AMD chip has a die size of 195 mm², while the Intel chip's die size is not recorded. The AMD chip has a part number of 100-000001868, while the Intel chip has a part number of SAE3K. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $309. The AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, with the codename Gorgon Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which uses Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, and the foundry is TSMC. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache.

The Intel Core 3 304 uses the codename Wildcat Lake and belongs to the Core 3 generation. The process node is 3 nm, and the foundry is Intel. The cache layout is different: 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part has a larger total cache footprint when accounting for the per-core L2 and the 8 MB L3, while the Intel part has a single shared L3 pool.

The AMD chip uses a dual-channel memory bus, which contributes to its higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip uses a single-channel bus, resulting in 59.7 GB/s. The AMD chip supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not. The AMD chip has 16 PCIe lanes, while the Intel chip has 6. The AMD chip's integrated graphics are Radeon 860M, while the Intel chip uses Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. Both chips are unlocked in terms of multiplier, meaning neither supports overclocking in that manner. The AMD chip is made on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel chip is made on a 3 nm process by Intel.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is the stronger processor for nearly all workloads. It wins 14 of 15 head-to-head tests, including all multi-thread benchmarks and both modern single-core tests. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and dual-channel memory, deliver a 248% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and a 259.3% lead in integer math. The AMD chip also holds a 15.5% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and a 7.9% lead in PassMark single-thread. The only test where the Intel Core 3 304 wins is Cinebench R15 single-core, a legacy benchmark where it leads by 18.6%.

The Intel Core 3 304 offers lower power consumption at 15 watts versus 28 watts, and it is manufactured on a 3 nm process versus 4 nm. Its 5 cores and 5 threads are sufficient for light productivity, and it has a lower memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s against AMD's 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip also has fewer PCIe lanes, 6 versus 16, and lacks ECC support. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $309, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

For users who prioritize multi-threaded performance, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or heavy multitasking, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For users who only run legacy single-threaded applications, the Intel Core 3 304 shows a narrow advantage in that one specific test, but it loses every other comparison. The benchmark results indicate that the AMD chip is the more capable processor across the board, with the Intel chip's only win being an isolated case in an older benchmark.