AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and the Intel Core 5 213PE is decisively one-sided. Across all 15 recorded head-to-head tests, the Intel Core 5 213PE wins every single matchup. The data shows no benchmark category where the AMD processor takes a lead, making the performance gap both consistent and substantial.

The largest single-core advantage appears in Cinebench R23, where Intel scores 3172 against AMD's 1818, a delta of -42.7% for the AMD part. The single-core gap in Cinebench R15 is smaller in percentage terms, with Intel at 319 versus 271, a 15% difference. In PassMark single-thread testing, the gap narrows further to just 4.6%, with Intel at 4060 and AMD at 3875. This pattern indicates that while Intel leads in every single-threaded workload, the margin shrinks considerably in certain integer-focused tests.

Multi-core results intensify the divide. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows Intel at 22468 against AMD's 11461, a delta of -49%. Cinebench R15 multi-core has Intel at 2264 versus 1712, a 24.4% gap. PassMark multi-thread results show Intel at 26434 versus 19927, a 24.6% difference. The multi-core data confirms that Intel's advantage grows when all threads are engaged, likely reflecting its higher core and thread counts.

In specialized PassMark workloads, Intel's margins vary. Data compression shows Intel at 298804 versus 237484, a 20.5% lead. Data encryption has Intel at 15916 versus 11814, a 25.8% gap. Extended instructions yield the closest non-single-thread result: Intel at 19565 versus 17003, a 13.1% difference. Floating-point math shows Intel at 68587 versus 42621, a 37.9% lead. Integer math has Intel at 92089 versus 63475, a 31.1% margin. Prime number finding shows the largest percentage gap outside Cinebench, with Intel at 114 versus 62, a 45.6% difference. Physics simulation has Intel at 1624 versus 1089, a 32.9% lead. Random string sorting shows Intel at 32027 versus 25435, a 20.6% margin.

The average benchmark scores reflect this overall imbalance. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has an average score of 29461, placing it in the 81st percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 213PE averages 35428, placing it in the 85th percentile. The nearest rivals in the database confirm each processor's positioning: AMD's closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X at 29447 (0% delta), while Intel's closest competitor is the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35403 (0.1% delta).

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses the Krackan Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry.

Core and thread counts differ notably. The AMD part offers 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part offers 8 cores and 16 threads. This gives Intel a 33% advantage in core count and thread count, which directly explains its multi-core benchmark dominance.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both processors share an L1 cache of 80 KB per core. L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel provides 2 MB per core. L3 cache shows the most dramatic difference, with AMD offering 4 MB total versus Intel's 24 MB shared. That 20 MB L3 gap likely contributes to Intel's lead in data-heavy workloads like compression and encryption.

Clock speeds favor Intel as well. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost of 4.60 GHz. The Intel base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost of 5.20 GHz. Both processors are multiplier-unlocked, meaning neither offers overclocking flexibility from the factory.

Memory support differs in type and bandwidth. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel access and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel access and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Intel also supports ECC memory, while AMD does not. Despite lower peak bandwidth, Intel's larger cache may compensate in many workloads.

PCIe connectivity shows a generational split. AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The newer PCIe standard and additional lanes give Intel an advantage for expansion and storage bandwidth.

Integrated graphics also differ. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The database does not include graphics benchmarks for either processor, so performance comparisons cannot be quantified here.

Market segments and sockets reflect different target platforms. AMD uses Socket FP8 for mobile systems. Intel uses Socket 1700 for desktop systems. The Intel TDP is 65 watts, well above AMD's 28 watts, indicating a more power-hungry desktop-oriented design.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE wins every recorded benchmark category, so the analysis focuses on the scale of its advantage across different use cases.

For single-threaded responsiveness, Intel leads by a modest margin. The PassMark single-thread score difference of 4.6% is the smallest gap in the entire comparison. This suggests that in everyday tasks with light thread usage, the two processors would feel closer in performance, though Intel still holds the edge.

For heavily threaded workloads, Intel's advantage becomes pronounced. The 49% gap in Cinebench R23 multi-core and the 45.6% gap in prime number finding indicate that multi-threaded rendering, scientific computation, and similar parallel tasks will show dramatic differences. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration combined with 24 MB of L3 cache and higher clock speeds gives Intel a clear structural advantage.

For memory-sensitive workloads like data compression and encryption, Intel leads by roughly 20-25%. The larger L3 cache likely helps these operations, which benefit from keeping working sets close to the cores. The 24 MB shared L3 versus 4 MB L3 is the most significant architectural differentiator.

For floating-point and integer math, Intel leads by 37.9% and 31.1% respectively. These results point to advantages in scientific computing, financial modeling, and code compilation where arithmetic throughput is critical.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 does not win any category in the head-to-head data. Its advantages are structural rather than performance-based: lower TDP at 28 watts, mobile socket compatibility, LPDDR5X memory support, and a 4 nm process node. For power-constrained mobile environments, the AMD part would be the appropriate choice despite its lower scores.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE averages 35428, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 averages 29461. Intel sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, AMD in the 81st percentile.

Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap?

A: It varies by test. PassMark single-thread shows a 4.6% lead for Intel, Cinebench R15 single-core shows a 15% lead, and Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 42.7% lead.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 does not.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor uses a newer PCIe standard?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes.

Q: What is the L3 cache size difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear conclusion: the Intel Core 5 213PE outperforms the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 across every measured benchmark. With 15 wins out of 15 head-to-head tests, Intel's advantage is not marginal but structural, driven by more cores, higher clock speeds, and a much larger L3 cache.

For desktop workloads where performance matters most, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the superior choice. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22468 nearly doubles AMD's 11461, and its 85th percentile ranking versus AMD's 81st confirms broader competitiveness against all CPUs in the database. The Intel part also offers ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5, features that matter for workstation and server-adjacent applications.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 remains relevant for mobile deployments. Its 28-watt TDP, Socket FP8 compatibility, and LPDDR5X memory support target power-sensitive portable systems where Intel's 65-watt desktop design cannot operate. The AMD part uses a more advanced 4 nm process and still delivers respectable single-thread performance within 4.6% of Intel in PassMark testing.

The choice depends entirely on the platform. For desktop systems with adequate cooling and power delivery, the Intel Core 5 213PE delivers measurably better performance in every category. For mobile systems prioritizing power efficiency and compact design, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 offers the appropriate form factor with the trade-off of lower benchmark scores.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 | Intel Core 5 213PE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Krackan Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | None | $221 |