AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Xeon 6507P Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and Intel Xeon 6507P occupy different corners of the processor market, yet the database places both at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. The AMD part, a 6-core mobile chip built on Zen 5, posts an average benchmark score of 41,208, while the Intel Xeon, an 8-core server processor on Granite Rapids, averages 40,426. That near parity in overall score masks a stark split: the Xeon dominates multi-threaded and compute-heavy workloads, while the Ryzen takes the single-thread crown. The following analysis draws on recorded measurements to clarify where each processor excels.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Xeon 6507P has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which chip wins in single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 3,785 in PassMark single-thread, 3.9% higher than the Intel Xeon 6507P's 3,643.

Q: How do memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The Intel Xeon 6507P uses eight-channel DDR5 with 409.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses dual-channel DDR5/LPDDR5X with 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 includes a Radeon 840M iGPU; the Intel Xeon 6507P has no integrated graphics.

Q: What are the process nodes?

A: AMD uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while Intel uses a 5 nm process from its own foundry.

Q: Which processor is aimed at mobile versus server use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is a mobile part, while the Intel Xeon 6507P targets server and workstation workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge at the architectural level. AMD's Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC and has a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Xeon 6507P, in contrast, uses the Granite Rapids architecture, also its codename, and is part of the Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP) generation. It is fabricated on Intel's 5 nm process, with no die size listed in the database.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The AMD chip provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The Intel Xeon offers 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a much larger 48 MB of shared L3. This larger cache, combined with eight memory channels, gives the Xeon a substantial advantage in data-heavy server workloads. The AMD part, by contrast, relies on a smaller cache and dual-channel memory, but compensates with a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus the Xeon's 4.30 GHz.

Other architectural differences include PCIe support. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel Xeon 6507P offers Gen 5 with 88 lanes. The Xeon also has a much higher TDP of 150 W, compared to the AMD's 28 W, reflecting its server-oriented design. The AMD chip includes a Radeon 840M integrated GPU, while the Xeon has none. Both support ECC memory, but the Xeon's eight-channel memory bus delivers 409.6 GB/s versus the AMD's 89.6 GB/s.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data shows a clear division of labor. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins in single-thread performance, scoring 3,785 in PassMark single-thread, a 3.9% edge over the Xeon's 3,643. This makes it the better choice for lightly threaded applications, such as everyday productivity, web browsing, and legacy software that relies on one or two cores. Its integrated Radeon 840M also provides display output and basic graphics acceleration, which is essential for mobile systems without a discrete GPU. The low 28 W TDP further suits thin-and-light laptops.

The Intel Xeon 6507P wins in every other recorded benchmark, and often by wide margins. Its most dominant results come in prime number finding, where it scores 224 versus the AMD's 77, a 65.6% advantage, and in physics, where it scores 2,935 versus 1,119, a 61.9% lead. These tests reflect heavy integer and floating-point workloads, typical of scientific computing, financial modeling, and server-side processing. The Xeon also leads in floating-point math (69,604 vs 42,934, a 38.3% gap), extended instructions (27,385 vs 18,456, a 32.6% gap), and multithread performance (31,233 vs 21,054, a 32.6% gap). Its eight-channel memory and 48 MB L3 cache make it well suited for data compression, encryption, and large in-memory datasets.

In short, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the pick for single-thread responsiveness and mobile efficiency, while the Intel Xeon 6507P is the clear winner for multi-threaded, memory-intensive server workloads.

Specification Differences

The following table lists the key specifications where the two processors differ, based on the database records.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 | Intel Xeon 6507P |

|----------------|------------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 8 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 150 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 4710 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Granite Rapids |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Granite Rapids |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP) |

| Process node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 5 nm (Intel) |

| Die size | 195 mm² | Not listed |

| L1 cache (per core) | 80 KB | 112 KB |

| L2 cache (per core) | 1 MB | 2 MB |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 48 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR5 |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Eight-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 409.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes | Gen 5, 88 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | N/A |

| Market segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release date | 2026-01-04 | 2025-02-23 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $765 |

| Part number | 100-000001866 | SRVU5 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results show a decisive victory for the Intel Xeon 6507P, which wins 9 of the 11 recorded tests. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins only the two single-thread tests, both with identical scores of 3,785 versus 3,643, a 3.9% advantage.

The Xeon's largest wins come in compute-heavy workloads. In PassMark find prime numbers, the Xeon scores 224 against the AMD's 77, a 65.6% lead. In physics, the Xeon posts 2,935 versus 1,119, a 61.9% margin. Floating-point math shows a 38.3% gap (69,604 vs 42,934), and extended instructions and multithread both show a 32.6% gap (27,385 vs 18,456 and 31,233 vs 21,054, respectively). Random string sorting gives the Xeon a 31.3% edge (39,682 vs 27,252), data encryption a 30.1% lead (17,753 vs 12,418), and data compression a 28% advantage (356,190 vs 256,420). The smallest Intel win is in integer math, where the Xeon scores 88,877 versus 65,991, a 25.8% difference.

These results align with the processors' positioning. The Xeon's eight cores, 16 threads, and 48 MB L3 cache drive its multi-threaded dominance, while the AMD's higher boost clock and Zen 5 architecture give it a narrow single-thread edge. The database also shows that both chips sit at the 87th percentile, but their average scores differ: the AMD averages 41,208, close to the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41,215) and Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41,263), while the Intel Xeon averages 40,426, near the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H (40,431) and Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (40,518). This places them in similar overall performance tiers, despite their different design goals.