AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Processor U300L Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440
Processor U300L
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Processor U300L
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database does not contain a direct head-to-head benchmark comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Intel Processor U300L. No shared test results are recorded for both processors in a common workload, and the Intel Processor U300L has no individual benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and no nearest rival data exists for it.
The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, by contrast, has a full set of PassMark measurements. Its multithread score is 21054, its single-thread score is 3785, and its average benchmark score is 41208. That average places it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rival to the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, which scores 41215, a delta of 0.0 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H is 0.1 percent behind, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is 0.4 percent behind, and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H is 0.6 percent ahead. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 therefore sits in a tight cluster of high-end mobile and desktop parts, effectively matching the Core Ultra 7 356H and trailing the Core Ultra X7 358H by less than one percent.
Since the Intel Processor U300L lacks recorded scores, no direct win can be assigned to either processor in any specific test. The data only supports a comparison of the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 against its own nearest rivals, not against the U300L. The U300L’s 50th percentile placement, however, indicates that it is positioned as a mid-range processor in the database, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440’s 87th percentile shows a much higher overall standing.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different manufacturers, use different process nodes, and target different sockets. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is built on Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC and fits an AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Processor U300L uses Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-PS, part of the Intel Processor generation based on Raptor Lake. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel and fits an Intel Socket 1700.
Core and thread counts differ substantially. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Processor U300L has 5 cores and 6 threads. The Ryzen part therefore offers more than double the thread count of the Intel part. Clock speeds also differ: the AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Intel chip has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz.
Cache layouts are similar in total L3 but differ in L2. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 per core and 8 MB of L3. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses 1 MB of L2 per core, whereas the Intel Processor U300L uses 1.25 MB of L2 per core. Die size is recorded for the AMD part at 195 mm², while no die size is listed for the Intel part.
Memory support differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory support. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded and ECC memory is not supported. The AMD part also offers more PCIe lanes: Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, compared to Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the Intel CPU.
Integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses a Radeon 840M, while the Intel Processor U300L uses UHD Graphics 48EU. Power targets are not equal: the AMD processor has a 28 watt TDP, the Intel processor a 15 watt TDP. Production status for both is listed as Active, and neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has an average benchmark score of 41208 and sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Processor U300L has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database and sits at the 50th percentile.
Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor U300L has 5 cores and 6 threads.
Q: What are the boost clock speeds of the two processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Processor U300L boosts to 4.40 GHz.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Processor U300L does not.
Q: What memory types does each processor support?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor U300L supports DDR4 and DDR5.
Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel Processor U300L provides Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes.
Specification Differences
The following specification fields differ between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Intel Processor U300L:
- Manufacturer: AMD vs Intel
- Cores: 6 vs 5
- Threads: 12 vs 6
- Base clock: 2.00 GHz vs 1.20 GHz
- Boost clock: 4.80 GHz vs 4.40 GHz
- TDP: 28 watts vs 15 watts
- Socket: AMD Socket FP8 vs Intel Socket 1700
- Architecture: Zen 5 vs Raptor Lake
- Codename: Gorgon Point vs Raptor Lake-PS
- Generation: Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) vs Intel Processor (Raptor Lake)
- Process node: 4 nm vs 10 nm
- Foundry: TSMC vs Intel
- Die size: 195 mm² vs not recorded
- L2 cache: 1 MB per core vs 1.25 MB per core
- Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X vs DDR4, DDR5
- Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s vs not recorded
- ECC memory: supported vs not supported
- PCIe: Gen 4, 16 lanes vs Gen 4, 8 lanes
- Integrated graphics: Radeon 840M vs UHD Graphics 48EU
- Release date: 2026-01-04 vs 2024-04-07
- Launch MSRP: not recorded vs $107 (stated once as launch MSRP)
- Part number: 100-000001866 vs SRPEKSRPEM
- Average benchmark score: 41208 vs 0
- Percentile vs all CPUs: 87 vs 50
- Nearest rivals: four recorded vs none recorded
Fields that are the same include L1 cache at 80 KB per core, L3 cache at 8 MB, dual-channel memory bus, mobile market segment, Active production status, and a locked multiplier.
The Verdict
The recorded data points to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 as the higher-performing processor. It has more cores, more threads, a higher base clock, a higher boost clock, a smaller process node, a larger die, more PCIe lanes, ECC support, and a substantially higher percentile ranking. Its average benchmark score of 41208 places it at the 87th percentile, while the Intel Processor U300L sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded average score. The Ryzen part also carries a higher TDP of 28 watts against the Intel part’s 15 watts, which aligns with its stronger core and thread configuration.
The Intel Processor U300L does have advantages in the data. It is built on Intel’s own 10 nm process, uses 1.25 MB of L2 per core compared to 1 MB on the AMD chip, supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, and carries a launch MSRP of $107. Its lower TDP of 15 watts suggests a lower power envelope, and its earlier release date of 2024-04-07 predates the AMD part’s 2026-01-04 release.
For workloads that scale with thread count, multithread performance, and memory bandwidth, the database clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. Its 12 threads, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 16 PCIe lanes give it structural advantages that the Intel Processor U300L cannot match on paper. For systems constrained by power draw or those needing DDR4 compatibility, the Intel Processor U300L remains a viable option, but the recorded data does not include any benchmark results to substantiate a performance claim in its favor. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the only one of the two with measured performance data, and that data places it among the top 13 percent of all CPUs in the database.