AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Processor N250 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance advantage for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 across every measurable workload category. The AMD processor achieves an average benchmark score of 41,208, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Processor N250, by contrast, has no individual benchmark scores recorded and an average score of 0, placing it in the 50th percentile. This absence of recorded data means the comparison must rely on the architectural and specification differences documented in the database.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 delivers a single-thread score of 3,785, which reflects its 4.80 GHz boost clock and Zen 5 architecture. The Intel Processor N250 has a boost clock of 3.80 GHz, but without recorded benchmark results, the database cannot quantify the performance gap in raw scores. The multi-thread score for the AMD chip is 21,054, driven by its 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel chip offers 4 cores and 4 threads, indicating that multi-threaded workloads would favor the AMD processor substantially, though exact deltas remain unquantified.

In integer math, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 65,991, and in floating-point math it scores 42,934. These results indicate strong computational throughput for scientific and financial workloads. The data encryption score of 12,418 and data compression score of 256,420 further demonstrate the AMD chip's capability in data-intensive tasks. The extended instructions score of 18,456 suggests robust support for modern instruction sets, while the random string sorting score of 27,252 indicates efficient memory and cache handling.

The physics score of 1,119 and prime number finding score of 77 are the two lowest recorded metrics for the AMD processor. These results suggest that while the chip excels in parallel workloads, certain single-threaded or latency-sensitive tasks may not benefit as much from its architecture. The nearest rival data shows the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 sits within 0.6% of the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, with a delta of 0.6% in favor of the AMD chip. It is effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H at a 0% delta, and trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H by 0.1% and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X by 0.4%. These comparisons place the AMD processor at the upper edge of its performance class.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation with a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Processor N250 uses the Twin Lake architecture, which is part of the Intel Processor generation built on Alder Lake-N technology, fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel. The process node advantage for AMD is significant, as the smaller 4 nm node allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency.

The AMD processor features 6 cores and 12 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading that doubles the thread count. The Intel chip has 4 cores and 4 threads, with no multithreading capability. This fundamental difference means the AMD chip can process twice as many threads concurrently, which directly impacts multi-threaded benchmark performance. The base clock for the AMD chip is 2.00 GHz, while the Intel chip has a base clock of 0.10 GHz, though the boost clocks are closer at 4.80 GHz and 3.80 GHz respectively.

Cache configurations differ notably between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, resulting in a total L2 cache of 6 MB across its 6 cores. It also includes 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor N250 offers 96 KB of L1 cache per core, which is larger per core than AMD's allocation, but its 2 MB of L2 cache is shared across all 4 cores, and its 6 MB of L3 cache is also shared. The AMD chip's larger total cache pool, combined with its higher thread count, gives it an advantage in workloads that benefit from repeated data access.

Memory support distinguishes the two as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, delivering a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory, but only in a single-channel configuration, resulting in 38.4 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This 51.2 GB/s difference puts the AMD chip at a substantial advantage in memory-bound workloads. The AMD processor also supports ECC memory, while the Intel chip does not.

PCIe connectivity differs in generation and lane count. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, while the Intel Processor N250 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes. The newer PCIe generation and higher lane count on the AMD side provide greater bandwidth for discrete GPUs, NVMe storage, and other expansion devices. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD chip pairs with the Radeon 840M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. The database does not record performance scores for either integrated GPU, so the comparison remains qualitative.

Power characteristics show a substantial difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Processor N250 has a TDP of 6 watts. This places the Intel chip in a much lower thermal envelope, indicating its design focus on low-power, fanless, or passively cooled systems. The AMD chip's higher TDP allows for greater sustained performance but requires more robust cooling solutions.

The Verdict

The recorded data clearly indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the superior processor for performance-critical workloads. Its 6-core, 12-thread configuration, 4.80 GHz boost clock, larger cache pool, dual-channel memory support, and PCIe Gen 4 connectivity position it as a capable mobile processor for demanding applications. The 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database reinforces this assessment, as does its proximity in average score to the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, and AMD Ryzen 9 5900X.

The Intel Processor N250 occupies a different performance class entirely. With 4 cores and 4 threads, a 3.80 GHz boost clock, single-channel memory, and PCIe Gen 3, it is designed for efficiency rather than peak performance. Its 6 watt TDP makes it suitable for ultra-portable devices, low-power embedded systems, and fanless designs where thermal constraints are paramount. The 50th percentile ranking confirms its position as a mid-range performer in the broader CPU landscape.

Users who require maximum compute throughput, especially in multi-threaded applications such as video rendering, software compilation, or data analysis, should select the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. The data shows its multi-thread score of 21,054, integer math score of 65,991, and floating-point math score of 42,934, which are strong indicators of sustained performance under load. Users who prioritize energy efficiency, silent operation, or minimal power draw should consider the Intel Processor N250, as its 6 watt TDP is a fraction of the AMD chip's 28 watts.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Processor N250 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The AMD chip supports simultaneous multithreading, doubling its thread count, whereas the Intel chip does not.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, which is 1.00 GHz higher than the Intel Processor N250's boost clock of 3.80 GHz.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 delivers 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth through its dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X support. The Intel Processor N250 provides 38.4 GB/s through its single-channel DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 support.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor N250 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Processor N250 has a TDP of 6 watts, which is 22 watts lower.

Q: How does the AMD processor compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has an average benchmark score of 41,208. It is tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H at a 0% delta, trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H by 0.1%, trails the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X by 0.4%, and leads the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H by 0.6%.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins in every performance category that the database records. Its multi-thread score of 21,054 indicates a clear advantage in parallel workloads such as video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific simulation. The integer math score of 65,991 and floating-point math score of 42,934 suggest strong performance in computational tasks ranging from financial modeling to engineering analysis. The data compression score of 256,420 and data encryption score of 12,418 point to efficient handling of file archives and secure data processing. The single-thread score of 3,785 indicates responsive performance in everyday applications and lightly threaded software.

The Intel Processor N250 wins in power efficiency. Its TDP of 6 watts is 22 watts lower than the AMD chip's 28 watts, making it the preferred choice for battery-constrained devices, compact form factors, and thermally limited environments. The database does not record benchmark scores for the Intel chip, so its performance characteristics cannot be quantified, but its lower power envelope and simpler architecture suggest it would be sufficient for basic productivity tasks, web browsing, and media playback. The Intel chip's support for DDR4 memory also provides a cost-effective memory option in systems where DDR5 availability or pricing is a concern.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 also wins in connectivity and expansion. Its PCIe Gen 4 interface with 16 lanes provides higher bandwidth for modern storage and graphics solutions compared to the Intel chip's PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes. The dual-channel memory architecture of the AMD chip doubles the memory bandwidth available to the CPU, which is critical for integrated graphics performance and memory-intensive applications. The AMD chip's larger L3 cache of 8 MB, compared to the Intel chip's 6 MB, further supports its advantage in workloads with high data locality.

The Intel Processor N250 wins in platform simplicity. Its single-channel memory, 6 watt TDP, and PCIe Gen 3 connectivity align with entry-level and low-cost system designs. The 10 nm process node, while larger than AMD's 4 nm node, is mature and proven in the Alder Lake-N family. The Intel chip's 96 KB of L1 cache per core is larger than the AMD chip's 80 KB per core, which may provide a slight advantage in certain low-level instruction-heavy workloads, though this is not reflected in any recorded benchmark data.

The recorded data supports a clear split: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 for performance, the Intel Processor N250 for efficiency. Each processor serves a distinct market segment, and the choice between them depends on whether the priority is raw compute throughput or minimal power consumption.