AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Intel Processor 300T. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, and the winsA and winsB fields both register zero. This absence of paired measurements means any performance analysis must rely on the separately recorded benchmark scores for the AMD part and the aggregate positioning data for both processors.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 delivers a substantial multithreaded score of 21054 in the PassMark multithread test. Its single-thread score of 3785 places it in a competitive position for lightly threaded workloads. The integer math score of 65991, floating point math score of 42934, and extended instructions score of 18456 all indicate strong computational throughput. Data compression reaches 256420, while data encryption completes at 12418. Random string sorting finishes at 27252, and find prime numbers returns 77. The physics score of 1119 rounds out the recorded workload results.

The Intel Processor 300T has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its nearest rivals array is empty. The only performance-related data point available is its percentileVsAllCpus rating of 50, meaning it sits at the midpoint of all CPUs tracked in the database. The AMD part, by contrast, holds an 87th percentile ranking across all CPUs.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 achieves an average benchmark score of 41208. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H at 41215 (a 0 percent delta), the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H at 41263 (a -0.1 percent delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41376 (a -0.4 percent delta), and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H at 40967 (a 0.6 percent delta). This clustering shows the AMD part sits within a narrow performance band around the 41000 average score mark, slightly behind the Ryzen 9 5900X and narrowly ahead of the Core Ultra X7 358H.

Because the Intel Processor 300T lacks recorded scores, no exact numerical comparison between the two specific processors can be drawn from the database. The percentile gap, however, is stark: 87th percentile versus 50th percentile. This indicates the AMD processor occupies a significantly higher performance tier in the overall CPU distribution.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins across every measurable benchmark category in the database. The multithread score of 21054 demonstrates strong parallel workload handling, supported by 6 cores and 12 threads. Single-thread performance of 3785 confirms capable per-core execution. The floating point and integer math scores suggest robust arithmetic processing, while the extended instructions score of 18456 indicates solid SIMD and specialized instruction throughput. Data compression at 256420 and encryption at 12418 point to efficient memory and cryptographic operations.

The Intel Processor 300T wins no recorded benchmark categories. With no benchmark entries in the database, its measured performance profile is entirely absent. The processor does carry a 35 TDP rating compared to the AMD part's 28 TDP, but this is a power specification, not a performance result. The Intel part also offers a higher base clock of 3.40 GHz against the AMD's 2.00 GHz, yet no benchmark data confirms whether this translates into actual workload advantages.

For use-case analysis, the AMD processor's benchmark suite covers a broad range of computational tasks: integer and floating point math, data compression, encryption, prime number finding, random string sorting, physics calculations, single-threaded and multithreaded operations. Each recorded score favors the AMD part. The Intel processor's lack of recorded data means the database provides no evidence of any workload category where it outperforms the AMD chip.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 records an average benchmark score of 41208. The Intel Processor 300T has an average benchmark score of zero, as no benchmark results are recorded in the database.

Q: How do their CPU percentile rankings compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Processor 300T ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each part?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T does not support ECC memory.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors include?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 includes Radeon 840M graphics. The Intel Processor 300T includes UHD Graphics 710.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and Intel Processor 300T differ across nearly every recorded specification category. The AMD part uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part uses 2 cores and 4 threads. Base clocks diverge: the AMD runs at 2.00 GHz with a 4.80 GHz boost clock, while the Intel runs at 3.40 GHz with no boost clock listed. The TDP ratings differ, with the AMD at 28 and the Intel at 35.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. Memory support differs: the AMD part lists DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part lists DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded for the AMD at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory support is present on the AMD and absent on the Intel.

PCIe configurations differ: the AMD specifies Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel specifies Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 840M on the AMD versus UHD Graphics 710 on the Intel. Market segments also differ, with the AMD classified as Mobile and the Intel as Desktop.

The release dates differ: the AMD lists 2026-01-04 and the Intel lists 2024-01-07. The part numbers differ: 100-000001866 for the AMD and SRN3K for the Intel. The die size differs, with the AMD at 195 mm² and the Intel at 163 mm². The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $82, stated once here as recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). It is built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-S, belonging to the Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) generation. It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel.

Cache hierarchies differ between the two. The AMD part has 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 cache per core, and 8 MB L3 cache. The Intel part has 80 KB L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB L2 cache per core, and 6 MB shared L3 cache. The per-core L1 is identical, but the L2 per core and total L3 configurations differ.

The AMD part's hybrid generation designation of Zen 5 / Zen 5c suggests a mix of high-performance and efficiency-oriented cores, though the database does not specify which cores are which. The Intel part uses a uniform Raptor Lake core design. The foundry difference is notable: TSMC produces the AMD chip at 4 nm, while Intel produces its own chip at 10 nm.

The Verdict

The recorded data positions the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 as the higher-performing processor. Its 87th percentile ranking versus the Intel's 50th percentile, combined with a complete set of benchmark scores across 11 tests, gives it a clear measured advantage. The Intel Processor 300T, with no recorded benchmarks and a zero average score, cannot be placed above the AMD part in any performance category based on the database contents.

The AMD processor's 6 cores and 12 threads provide a structural advantage for multithreaded workloads, and its benchmark scores confirm this: 21054 in multithread, 65991 in integer math, and 42934 in floating point math. The Intel part's 2 cores and 4 threads leave it at a theoretical disadvantage for parallel tasks, though without recorded scores, the database offers no direct confirmation.

The Intel Processor 300T does hold advantages in other dimensions. Its higher base clock of 3.40 GHz, larger per-core L2 cache of 1.25 MB, PCIe Gen 5 support, and DDR4 compatibility make it a distinct desktop-oriented part. The AMD chip's mobile classification, LPDDR5X support, ECC capability, and 4 nm process node reflect a different design philosophy aimed at power-sensitive portable systems.

For users selecting between these two, the data suggests the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 for workloads where measured computational performance matters, given its comprehensive benchmark record and top-quartile percentile standing. The Intel Processor 300T remains an option for desktop builds requiring PCIe Gen 5 or DDR4 memory support, but the database contains no performance evidence to recommend it on speed grounds. The AMD part's 28 TDP also indicates lower power draw than the Intel's 35 TDP, a relevant factor for system thermal design.