AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL. The benchmark record for the Intel part is empty, showing zero recorded scores across all tested workloads, while the AMD processor has a full suite of PassMark measurements. This absence of a common benchmark basis means a direct per-test comparison cannot be constructed from the recorded data. The available analysis instead relies on the aggregate performance metrics and percentile rankings for each processor.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 records an average benchmark score of 41,208 across all tests, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has no recorded average score and sits at the 50th percentile, reflecting the absence of measured performance data. The AMD processor's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H with an average score of 41,215 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H at 41,263 with a delta of -0.1 percent, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41,376 with a delta of -0.4 percent, and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H at 40,967 with a delta of 0.6 percent. These deltas indicate that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 performs within a tight band of roughly one percent of these four rivals, essentially matching the Intel Core Ultra 7 parts and the Ryzen 9 5900X in aggregate throughput.

In single-thread performance, the AMD processor scores 3,785 on the PassMark single-thread test. Its multithread score is 21,054. The data shows that the AMD part achieves a data compression score of 256,420, which is by far the highest recorded workload score for this processor. Data encryption reaches 12,418, extended instructions hit 18,456, and floating-point math reaches 42,934. Integer math scores 65,991, physics scores 1,119, random string sorting scores 27,252, and finding prime numbers scores 77.

Since the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has no benchmark entries, the database cannot confirm any workload-specific wins for either processor. The AMD processor's percentile rank of 87 versus the Intel processor's rank of 50 suggests that, based on recorded data, the AMD part occupies a substantially higher position in the overall performance distribution. However, the Intel part's lack of measurements means this gap is inferred from the percentile fields rather than from direct comparative tests.

FAQ

Q: Does the database show a direct performance comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL?

A: No direct head-to-head benchmarks exist in the database. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has an empty benchmark record with no scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a complete set of PassMark measurements. Without common test results, a per-workload comparison is not possible from the recorded data.

Q: What is the aggregate performance indicator for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440?

A: The AMD processor has an average benchmark score of 41,208 and ranks at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41,215), the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41,263), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41,376), all fall within a 0.4 percent delta, indicating near-parity aggregate throughput.

Q: What is the aggregate performance indicator for the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL?

A: The Intel processor has an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile rank of 50, with no recorded benchmark entries in the database. The data does not provide any measured workload scores for this part.

Q: How does the single-thread performance of the AMD processor compare to its own multithread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 3,785 in the single-thread test and 21,054 in the multithread test. The multithread score is roughly 5.6 times the single-thread score, reflecting the processor's 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which recorded workload produces the highest score for the AMD processor?

A: The data compression test yields the highest score at 256,420. Other notable scores include integer math at 65,991, floating-point math at 42,934, and random string sorting at 27,252.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL in specific tests like compression or encryption?

A: No. The benchmark array for the Intel processor is empty, so there are no recorded scores for data compression, encryption, extended instructions, prime numbers, floating-point math, integer math, multithread, physics, random string sorting, or single-thread tests.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the only processor in this comparison with measured performance. The database shows an average benchmark score of 41,208 and an 87th percentile ranking, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD part's nearest rivals, all within one percent in aggregate score, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H. This places the AMD processor in a performance class clearly above the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL's unmeasured baseline.

The AMD processor delivers a single-thread score of 3,785 and a multithread score of 21,054, with a data compression score of 256,420 that dominates its workload profile. The Intel processor offers no recorded evidence of comparable performance. For any user relying on database measurements, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the only part with verified results. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL cannot be assessed for performance from the available data, and its 50th percentile rank is the sole indicator, placing it well below the AMD part's 87th percentile.

The AMD processor also carries advantages in several specification areas that align with its measured performance. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, supports ECC memory, and provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The Intel processor uses a 7 nm process from Intel, does not support ECC memory, and provides 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. These differences, combined with the benchmark data, point to the AMD processor as the stronger choice for workloads where the database has confirmed performance. The Intel part remains an unverified option with no recorded scores to support any performance claim.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL differ in several core specifications. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel processor has 14 cores and 18 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD part and 1.70 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks are 4.80 GHz for the AMD part and 4.60 GHz for the Intel part. The AMD processor has a thermal design power of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a thermal design power of 45 watts.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1851. The AMD part is classified as a mobile segment processor, while the Intel part is classified as a desktop segment processor. The AMD processor has a die size of 195 mm², while the Intel processor has no recorded die size. The AMD processor supports ECC memory, while the Intel processor does not. The AMD processor provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel processor provides 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU.

The integrated graphics differ: the AMD processor uses Radeon 840M, while the Intel processor uses Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR5 with memory type depending on the motherboard. Both processors use dual-channel memory buses and have the same memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The AMD processor has a release date of January 2026, while the Intel processor has a release date of April 2024. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135HL uses the Meteor Lake architecture with the codename Meteor Lake-PS, belonging to the Ultra 5 generation. The process node is 7 nm, fabricated by Intel.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD processor's total cache is spread across 6 cores, while the Intel processor's cache is spread across 14 cores with a larger shared L3 pool.

The AMD processor's architecture includes ECC memory support, a feature absent from the Intel part. The AMD processor also provides twice the PCIe Gen 4 lanes (16 versus 8). The integrated graphics architectures differ as well: the AMD part uses Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses Arc Xe-LPG 128EU. The AMD processor has a smaller process node (4 nm versus 7 nm), which typically indicates a more advanced manufacturing technology. The Intel processor has a larger core count (14 versus 6) and thread count (18 versus 12), but the AMD processor has a higher boost clock (4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz) and a lower thermal design power (28 watts versus 45 watts). The Intel part's release date predates the AMD part by nearly two years, with the AMD part launching in January 2026 and the Intel part launching in April 2024.