AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core i7-14700HX Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits decisively. The Intel Core i7-14700HX wins all 11 head-to-head tests against the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. There is no test in the recorded data where the AMD part comes out ahead. This is not a near-run contest; the Intel processor leads by margins ranging from 4.1% in single-thread work to 54.2% in floating-point math.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 does not win any of the direct comparisons. Its strengths are relative to its own power envelope and feature set rather than against this particular rival. The data shows a 28-watt TDP part with a 4.80 GHz boost clock and 6 cores, which places it in a different performance class than the 55-watt, 20-core Intel chip. The AMD part's 87th percentile ranking against all CPUs in the database is respectable, but the Intel part sits at the 89th percentile.

For workloads that stress a single core, the gap narrows considerably. The Intel part leads by only 4.1% in the passmark single-thread test, which is within the range of normal silicon variation. The AMD part's Zen 5 architecture delivers competitive single-thread performance per clock, even though it ultimately trails in absolute terms.

For heavily threaded workloads, the Intel processor dominates. The multithread score of 36,566 versus 21,054 represents a 42.4% advantage. This translates directly to rendering, video encoding, compilation, and other parallel tasks where the Intel part's 20 cores and 28 threads produce substantially more throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX records an average benchmark score of 45,953, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 41,208. The Intel part sits 11.5% higher in the database average.

Q: How large is the single-thread performance difference?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700HX scores 3,947 in the passmark single-thread test versus 3,785 for the AMD part, a delta of 4.1%. This is the smallest margin between the two processors across all recorded tests.

Q: What is the multithread performance gap?

A: The Intel part scores 36,566 in passmark multithread, which is 42.4% ahead of the AMD's 21,054. The Intel processor's additional cores and threads drive this advantage.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any benchmarks where it leads?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows zero wins for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 across all 11 recorded tests. The Intel Core i7-14700HX wins every comparison.

Q: How do their processor percentiles compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Intel Core i7-14700HX sits at the 89th percentile. Both are strong performers, but the Intel part ranks higher overall.

Q: What is the closest benchmark result between the two?

A: The passmark single-thread test shows the smallest gap at 4.1%. Both the passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread entries record identical scores for each processor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single advantage for the Intel Core i7-14700HX appears in floating-point math. The Intel part scores 93,836 against 42,934 for the AMD, a 54.2% lead. This is the widest delta in the entire comparison and indicates a substantial throughput advantage in scientific computing, simulation, and any workload that relies heavily on FPU throughput.

Prime number finding shows the second-largest gap. Intel scores 165 versus 77 for AMD, a 53.3% difference. This test is highly sensitive to integer arithmetic efficiency and memory latency, where the Intel architecture's larger cache configuration and higher clock speeds provide clear benefits.

Data encryption follows closely at 52.4% ahead. The Intel part records 26,092 against 12,418 for the AMD. Encryption workloads benefit from the Intel part's additional cores and the AES-NI implementation, which scales with core count in parallel encryption tasks.

Physics simulation shows a 50.3% lead for Intel, with scores of 2,252 versus 1,119. This test often reflects cache bandwidth and thread scheduling, both areas where the Intel part's 33 MB of shared L3 cache and 28 threads help considerably.

Integer math delivers a 49.7% advantage. Intel scores 131,296, while AMD scores 65,991. The gap tracks closely with the core and thread count difference between the two parts.

Random string sorting, a test that stresses memory allocation and pointer chasing, shows Intel ahead by 43.9% with scores of 48,544 versus 27,252. The larger cache hierarchy on the Intel part reduces memory stalls in this workload.

Multithread performance, the broadest measure of parallel capability, favors Intel by 42.4%. The 36,566 score versus 21,054 reflects the raw core count advantage: 20 cores and 28 threads for Intel against 6 cores and 12 threads for AMD.

Data compression shows a 41.5% lead for Intel. The 438,539 score versus 256,420 indicates that the Intel part's higher thread count translates directly to compression throughput, a workload that scales almost linearly with available cores.

Extended instructions, which measure SIMD and specialized instruction throughput, favor Intel by 28.2%. Scores of 25,718 versus 18,456 show that the Intel part's wider execution resources handle these workloads more efficiently.

The smallest margin is single-thread performance at 4.1%. Intel's 3,947 versus AMD's 3,785 shows that the Zen 5 architecture in the AMD part is competitive on a per-core basis, but the Intel part still takes the win with its higher 5.50 GHz boost clock.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts represent the most significant specification gap. The Intel Core i7-14700HX offers 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 provides 6 cores and 12 threads. This 14-core difference explains the multithread performance delta.

Clock speeds differ meaningfully. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz base and 4.80 GHz boost. The Intel part's 0.70 GHz higher boost ceiling contributes to its single-thread advantage.

Power targets diverge sharply. The Intel processor carries a 55-watt TDP, while the AMD part is rated at 28 watts. This 27-watt difference reflects the Intel part's higher core count and clock speeds, but also means the AMD part is designed for more thermally constrained chassis.

Cache configurations differ substantially. Both parts use 80 KB of L1 per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD uses 1 MB per core, while Intel uses 2 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a major split: AMD provides 8 MB total, while Intel offers 33 MB shared. This 25 MB difference in L3 capacity gives the Intel part a significant advantage in cache-sensitive workloads.

Memory support varies. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, and the database does not record a bandwidth figure for it. Both parts support ECC memory.

PCIe generations differ. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part's newer PCIe standard provides higher available bandwidth for compatible devices.

The integrated graphics differ. AMD pairs with Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The database records no graphics benchmark scores for either part.

The multiplier unlock status differs. The AMD part is locked, while the Intel part has an unlocked multiplier. This allows overclocking on the Intel part, assuming the laptop platform supports it.

Socket and packaging differ completely. AMD uses Socket FP8, while Intel uses BGA 1964. These are not interchangeable platforms.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process. Its codename is Gorgon Point, and it belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The die size is 195 mm². This is a modern, dense process node that prioritizes power efficiency.

The Intel Core i7-14700HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm Intel process. Its codename is Raptor Lake-HX, and it belongs to the Core i7 generation as a Raptor Lake-HX Refresh. The die size is 257 mm². The larger die accommodates the higher core count and cache capacity.

The process node difference is significant. TSMC's 4 nm node versus Intel's 10 nm node means the AMD part packs its 6 cores into a smaller die with lower power draw. The Intel part's larger die and older process node require substantially more power to drive its 20 cores.

Cache architecture differs beyond capacity. The AMD part's L2 cache is 1 MB per core, while Intel uses 2 MB per core. The L3 cache arrangement also differs: AMD provides 8 MB as a single pool, while Intel offers 33 MB shared across all cores. The Intel part's larger L3 cache helps it retain more working data closer to the cores.

The core topology differs. AMD's Zen 5 design with 6 cores and 12 threads uses simultaneous multithreading across all cores. Intel's Raptor Lake-HX uses a hybrid architecture with performance and efficiency cores, though the database does not specify the exact mix. The 20 cores and 28 threads indicate 8 performance cores with hyperthreading and 12 efficiency cores without, based on the thread count relationship, though the database does not confirm this directly.

Memory controller support differs. The AMD part supports LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5, which is common for thin-and-light mobile designs. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, offering compatibility with a wider range of existing memory modules.

PCIe support differs by generation. AMD's Gen 4 implementation is current for mobile platforms, while Intel's Gen 5 support is ahead of the curve for high-bandwidth storage and external graphics.

The Verdict

The data directs different users to different parts. The Intel Core i7-14700HX is the clear choice for workloads that scale with core count. Its 42.4% multithread advantage, 49.7% integer math lead, and 54.2% floating-point margin make it the stronger processor for rendering, compilation, scientific computing, and heavy multitasking. The 28 threads provide headroom for parallel workloads that the AMD part cannot match.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 suits a different profile. Its 28-watt TDP, versus 55 watts for Intel, positions it for thinner laptops with smaller cooling solutions. The 4 nm process and smaller die size indicate a power-efficient design. For users who prioritize battery life and portability over raw throughput, the AMD part delivers competitive single-thread performance at 4.1% behind Intel with substantially lower power draw.

The single-thread results tell an interesting story. The 4.1% gap is modest, and the Zen 5 architecture's per-core efficiency is evident. Users whose workloads are primarily single-threaded would notice little practical difference between the two parts, while benefiting from the AMD part's lower power consumption.

The percentile rankings confirm the overall picture. Both parts sit in the upper tier of all CPUs, with AMD at the 87th percentile and Intel at the 89th. The Intel part's higher average benchmark score of 45,953 versus 41,208 places it in a higher performance class, but the AMD part remains a capable processor in absolute terms.

For users who need maximum compute throughput in a larger laptop, the Intel Core i7-14700HX is the data-supported choice. For users who prioritize efficiency and are willing to trade multithread performance for lower power draw, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the appropriate selection. The recorded benchmarks show no scenario where the AMD part outperforms the Intel part, but the power envelope difference makes them suited to different hardware designs.