AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core 5 130UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Intel Core 5 130UL are positioned very differently in the database, and the recorded measurements confirm a decisive performance gap. The AMD part scores an average benchmark result of 41208, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0. The AMD processor sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Intel chip is at the 50th percentile. These figures alone indicate that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is in a higher performance class, and the head-to-head comparison is largely one-sided.

Looking at the closest rivals to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 provides context for its standing. Its average score of 41208 is essentially identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, which scores 41215 with a delta of 0 percent. It also matches the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H, which scores 41263, a delta of -0.1 percent, meaning the AMD chip trails that part by only a tenth of a percent. Against the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is 0.4 percent behind, with that rival scoring 41376. Conversely, it leads the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H by 0.6 percent, as that chip scores 40967. These tight deltas place the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 squarely in the company of high-end desktop and mobile processors from the previous generation, despite being a mobile-focused part.

The Intel Core 5 130UL, by contrast, has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark scores in the database. Its percentile ranking of 50 indicates it sits at the median of all tested CPUs, which is a far lower position than the AMD chip's 87th percentile. The absence of measured scores for the Intel part means the database cannot provide direct benchmark comparisons between the two, but the percentile gap and the average score difference are stark. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 delivers a multithreaded score of 21054, a single-thread score of 3785, and a floating-point math score of 42934. The Intel Core 5 130UL has no such numbers recorded, leaving its performance entirely unquantified in this dataset.

The AMD processor also shows strength in specific workloads. Its integer math score is 65991, its extended instructions score is 18456, and its data compression score is 256420. The data encryption score of 12418 and the random string sorting score of 27252 further illustrate its throughput capabilities. The physics score of 1119 and the find prime numbers score of 77 are lower, but these are less representative of general workload performance. The Intel Core 5 130UL cannot be measured against these figures because the database contains no results for it, making any direct comparison of individual tests impossible. The verdict from the recorded data is clear: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the far more capable processor, and the Intel Core 5 130UL offers no measured evidence of competitive performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has an average benchmark score of 41208, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has an average score of 0 because no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How do the percentile rankings compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 130UL is at the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the closest rivals to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440?

A: The nearest rivals are the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (score 41215, delta 0 percent), the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (score 41263, delta -0.1 percent), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (score 41376, delta -0.4 percent), and the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (score 40967, delta 0.6 percent).

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 130UL have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the Intel Core 5 130UL, and it has no nearest rivals listed either.

Q: What is the multithreaded performance score for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 records a multithreaded score of 21054 and a single-thread score of 3785.

Q: Which processor has a higher core count?

A: The Intel Core 5 130UL has 10 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores. Both have 12 threads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core 5 130UL uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-PS, belonging to the Core 5 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process node by Intel, and its die size is not recorded in the database.

Cache configurations also differ notably. Both processors have an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, but the L2 cache differs: the AMD chip has 1 MB per core, while the Intel chip has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is a more significant divergence. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel part a larger total cache pool, though the overall performance data does not translate that into measured wins.

Memory support also separates the two. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded, and it does not support ECC memory. The AMD chip's memory interface is broader in terms of supported types and includes error correction capability.

PCIe connectivity further differentiates them. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core 5 130UL provides PCIe Gen 4 with only 8 lanes from the CPU. This gives the AMD part twice the CPU-attached lane count, which matters for expandability and peripheral bandwidth. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD chip uses Radeon 840M, while the Intel chip uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.

Specification Differences

The core counts diverge significantly. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has 10 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part has more physical cores but the same thread count, indicating a different core configuration. Clock speeds also differ. The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 1.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The AMD chip runs at higher clocks in both metrics.

Thermal design power is another key difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel part is rated for lower power draw, but the AMD part offers higher clocks and far better measured performance. The sockets are entirely different: the AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. These are not interchangeable platforms.

The process nodes differ as noted: AMD uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while Intel uses a 10 nm process. The memory support differs in that AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. ECC memory is supported only on the AMD side. PCIe lane counts differ, with AMD offering 16 lanes and Intel offering 8 lanes, both at Gen 4. The integrated graphics are different models: Radeon 840M versus Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.

The release dates also differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a release date of 2026-01-04, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has a release date of 2024-04-07. The market segments differ too: the AMD chip is classified as Mobile, while the Intel chip is classified as Desktop. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP. Neither has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers are listed as 100-000001866 for AMD and unknown for Intel.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear choice. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the stronger processor by every measured metric in the database. Its average benchmark score of 41208 places it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, both of which score within a fraction of a percent. The Intel Core 5 130UL has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile, with no nearest rivals listed. The AMD chip delivers a multithreaded score of 21054, a single-thread score of 3785, and a floating-point math score of 42934, none of which can be matched against any Intel measurements because none exist.

The AMD processor also leads in clock speeds, with a boost of 4.80 GHz compared to 4.70 GHz, and a base of 2.00 GHz compared to 1.60 GHz. It uses a more advanced 4 nm process node versus Intel's 10 nm node. It offers ECC memory support, higher memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s, and twice the PCIe lanes at 16 versus 8. The Intel part counters with more cores (10 versus 6), a larger L3 cache (12 MB versus 8 MB), and a lower TDP of 15 watts versus 28 watts. But no benchmark data backs the Intel part's advantages, and the AMD chip's measured results show it operating in a higher performance tier.

For users selecting between these two, the recorded data supports the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. It is faster in the workloads the database tracks, better positioned among its peers, and architecturally more modern. The Intel Core 5 130UL may offer lower power consumption and more cores on paper, but the database cannot confirm any performance advantage from those specifications. The verdict is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, based purely on the evidence available.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins in every benchmark category where data exists. It records a multithreaded score of 21054, a single-thread score of 3785, an integer math score of 65991, and a floating-point math score of 42934. It also shows strength in data compression with a score of 256420, data encryption with 12418, extended instructions with 18456, and random string sorting with 27252. Its physics score is 1119, and its find prime numbers score is 77. These results cover a broad range of workload types, from mathematical computation to data handling, and the AMD chip performs competitively across all of them.

The Intel Core 5 130UL has no recorded wins in any category because the database contains no benchmark scores for it. Its advantages are limited to specification fields. It has more cores (10 versus 6), more L2 cache per core (1.25 MB versus 1 MB), and more shared L3 cache (12 MB versus 8 MB). It also has a lower TDP of 15 watts compared to 28 watts, which could indicate lower power draw in operation. It supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which may offer broader compatibility with existing platforms. Its socket is Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform, whereas the AMD chip uses a mobile socket.

The use-case split follows the data. For workloads that depend on measured processing throughput, such as multithreaded computing, floating-point math, integer math, data compression, and encryption, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the clear choice. Its 87th percentile ranking and average score of 41208 confirm its capability. For scenarios where lower power consumption is the priority, the Intel Core 5 130UL's 15-watt TDP is the only advantage it can claim from the database, but no performance numbers exist to show what that power budget buys. The AMD chip's higher TDP of 28 watts is paired with substantial measured output, making it the better option for performance-oriented tasks. The Intel part may fit a niche where its desktop socket, DDR4 support, and higher core count matter more than raw benchmark results, but the database offers no evidence of its processing strength.