AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Core 3 304 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data delivers a decisive result: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins all 11 recorded head-to-head comparisons against the Intel Core 3 304. The largest margin appears in PassMark integer math, where AMD scores 65,991 against Intel's 24,640, a 167.8% advantage. Data compression also shows a wide gap: 256,420 versus 114,775, a 123.4% delta. Random string sorting follows at 99.5% ahead, with 27,252 against 13,659.

The multithreaded PassMark score reinforces the pattern. AMD records 21,054 versus Intel's 11,625, a 81.1% lead. Extended instructions show a 90.5% difference (18,456 versus 9,686). Floating-point math lands at 44.5% ahead (42,934 versus 29,722), while data encryption shows 46.1% (12,418 versus 8,501). Physics results are closer but still favor AMD: 1,119 versus 868, a 28.9% margin. Prime number finding shows the smallest relative win at 13.2% (77 versus 68).

Single-thread performance is the tightest contest. AMD scores 3,785 against Intel's 3,614, a 4.7% advantage. This indicates the Intel part remains competitive in lightly threaded workloads, though it does not take the lead in any recorded test. Across all PassMark tests, the average benchmark score for AMD is 41,208, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Intel's average is 13,745, in the 68th percentile. The nearest rivals for AMD include the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H at 41,215 (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41,376 (-0.4%). Intel's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX at 13,786 (-0.3%) and the Intel Core i7-8750H at 13,868 (-0.9%).

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply at the architectural level. AMD uses a Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the codename Gorgon Point and a 195 mm² die size. Intel uses a 3 nm Intel process with the codename Wildcat Lake. AMD belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, while Intel is in the Core 3 generation. Both are mobile parts, but their internal designs differ substantially.

Core and thread counts favor AMD: 6 cores and 12 threads versus Intel's 5 cores and 5 threads. The Intel part has no hyperthreading equivalent in the recorded data, which partly explains its lower multithreaded scores. Clock speeds also differ. AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost of 4.80 GHz. Intel's base is 1.50 GHz with a boost of 4.30 GHz. TDP ratings show AMD at 28 watts and Intel at 15 watts, a notable efficiency trade-off.

Cache layouts are distinct. AMD provides 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. Intel provides 192 KB of L1 total, 2.5 MB of L2 total, and 6 MB of shared L3. Memory support differs as well: both accept DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but AMD runs dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while Intel runs single-channel with 59.7 GB/s. AMD also supports ECC memory; Intel does not. PCIe lane counts differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) versus Intel's Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics sets them apart. AMD includes a Radeon 840M, while Intel includes Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. Socket types differ: AMD Socket FP8 for AMD, Intel BGA 1516 for Intel. Release dates also differ: AMD's is recorded as January 4, 2026, and Intel's as April 15, 2026. Intel's launch MSRP is $309; no launch MSRP is recorded for AMD. Both parts are marked as Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 3 304 has 5 cores and 5 threads.

Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap?

A: The AMD part scores 3,785 in PassMark single-thread testing versus Intel's 3,614, a 4.7% advantage. This is the smallest margin among all head-to-head tests.

Q: What is the largest benchmark difference between the two?

A: PassMark integer math shows the biggest gap: AMD scores 65,991 versus Intel's 24,640, a 167.8% difference.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 304 does not.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each part provide?

A: AMD provides 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel bus. Intel provides 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel bus. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: How do their production statuses compare?

A: Both are listed as Active. AMD's release date is January 4, 2026, and Intel's is April 15, 2026.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice for multithreaded and memory-sensitive workloads: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. It wins every recorded benchmark, holds an 87th percentile ranking, and delivers an average score of 41,208, which is roughly three times Intel's average of 13,745. Its 12 threads, dual-channel memory, and larger L3 cache support these results. The Intel Core 3 304 remains viable for single-thread tasks where its 3,614 score trails by only 4.7%, and its 15 watt TDP suggests lower power draw. But in raw measured performance, AMD dominates across the board.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 | Intel Core 3 304 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 5 |

| Threads | 12 | 5 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Not specified |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Wildcat Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | Not specified |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 6 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $309 |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins every measured category in the head-to-head set. Its largest advantages appear in integer math, data compression, and random string sorting, which indicates strength in compute-heavy and data-processing tasks. The multithreaded score of 21,054 versus 11,625 gives it a clear edge for parallel workloads, and the dual-channel memory at 89.6 GB/s supports memory-intensive operations. Its 87th percentile ranking and average score of 41,208 position it near the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H and AMD Ryzen 9 5900X in the database.

The Intel Core 3 304 does not win any recorded benchmark, but its single-thread score of 3,614 is within 4.7% of AMD's 3,785. That narrow margin means Intel remains competitive in lightly threaded scenarios. Its 15 watt TDP is notably lower than AMD's 28 watts, which may suit power-constrained designs. The 68th percentile ranking places it near the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX and Intel Core i7-8750H. For users prioritizing raw performance in the recorded tests, AMD is the clear selection. For those weighing lower power draw and close single-thread performance, the Intel part has a narrower but real appeal.