AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete benchmark profile for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, while the Intel Arc G3 currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible at this time, but the AMD part's measured results can be analyzed against its nearest rivals to establish a performance baseline.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 posts an average benchmark score of 41,208 across all tests, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, scores 41,215, a delta of exactly 0 percent, meaning the two are statistically tied. The Intel Core Ultra 7 366H scores 41,263, which is 0.1 percent higher than the AMD part, a negligible margin. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop part, scores 41,376, putting it 0.4 percent ahead of the mobile Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. On the other side, the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H scores 40,967, which is 0.6 percent behind the AMD part. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 sits in a tightly contested performance band.

Looking at individual workloads, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 shows notable strengths in specific tasks. Its PassMark data compression score is 256,420, a very high figure that suggests strong performance in compression workloads. Data encryption scores 12,418, while extended instructions hit 18,456. In floating-point math, the chip scores 42,934, and in integer math, it reaches 65,991. The multithread score is 21,054, and the physics test yields 1,119. Random string sorting produces 27,252, and single-thread performance is recorded at 3,785 in both the single-thread and singlethread test entries.

The Intel Arc G3, by contrast, has an empty benchmark array. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. Without any measured scores, the data cannot confirm where the Arc G3 would land relative to the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. The 50th percentile figure may indicate an expected mid-range position, but it is not derived from recorded test results. The nearest rivals array for the Arc G3 is also empty, so no comparative deltas exist for it.

The head-to-head benchmarks field in the database contains no entries, and the win counters show zero wins for both parts. This means the system has not yet processed any direct comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and the Intel Arc G3. The data available only allows analysis of the AMD part against its established rivals, not against the Arc G3 specifically.

For the AMD part, the closeness of its rival deltas is striking. A 0 percent gap to the Core Ultra 7 356H means the two chips deliver effectively identical average performance. The 0.1 percent deficit to the Core Ultra 7 366H is within measurement noise. The 0.4 percent gap to the desktop Ryzen 9 5900X is small but real, showing that this mobile chip nearly matches a previous-generation desktop flagship in average score. The 0.6 percent lead over the Core Ultra X7 358H is the largest margin in the group, but still modest. These figures indicate that the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440's average performance is well established and competitive, but not dominant.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, the benchmark data shows specific workload strengths. The data compression score of 256,420 is by far the highest individual result in its profile, indicating that compression tasks are a clear strong suit. Integer math at 65,991 also stands out as a high figure, suggesting strong general-purpose arithmetic performance. Floating-point math at 42,934 is more moderate but still substantial. The multithread score of 21,054 reflects good parallel workload handling given its 6-core, 12-thread configuration. Single-thread performance at 3,785 is the weakest area relative to its own scores, though it still places the chip in the 87th percentile overall.

The physics score of 1,119 and the find prime numbers score of 77 are lower figures, indicating that highly iterative or physics-based computations are not this chip's primary strength. Data encryption at 12,418 and extended instructions at 18,456 are mid-range results. Random string sorting at 27,252 sits between the lower and higher scores.

For the Intel Arc G3, the database provides no benchmark results, so no workload-specific wins can be identified. The only recorded figure is its 50th percentile versus all CPUs, which is a global ranking rather than a per-test score. Without test data, the analysis cannot determine where the Arc G3 would excel. The chip's specifications suggest capabilities, but the database does not yet contain measured confirmation.

The win counters in the database are both set to zero, indicating no recorded head-to-head victories for either processor. This is consistent with the empty head-to-head benchmark array. The database has not yet generated comparative results between these two specific parts.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The chip integrates 6 cores and 12 threads, using a cache hierarchy of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The integrated graphics unit is the Radeon 840M.

The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake codename and belongs to the Arc G3 generation based on Panther Lake. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The chip has 14 cores and 14 threads, with a cache hierarchy of 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics unit is the Arc B370. The architecture field for the Arc G3 is listed as null, so the specific microarchitecture name is not recorded in the database.

The process node difference is notable. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 3 nm process from Intel. The smaller process node on the Intel side may offer density or efficiency advantages, but the database does not include transistor counts for either chip to confirm this. The die size for the Intel part is not recorded, so a direct physical comparison is not possible.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Intel part has more L1 cache per core at 192 KB versus 80 KB, more L2 cache per core at 2.5 MB versus 1 MB, and significantly more L3 cache at 18 MB shared versus 8 MB. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 14 cores and 14 threads. The lack of hyperthreading on the Intel part, given that threads equal cores, is a notable architectural difference.

The integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD part featuring the Radeon 840M and the Intel part featuring the Arc B370. Both are mobile parts, but the graphics solutions come from different vendors with different architectures.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Arc G3 has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a TDP of 25 watts. The AMD part runs slightly higher clocks at both ends and has a slightly higher power envelope.

The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 2540. Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports only LPDDR5X. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The memory bandwidth figures differ significantly: the AMD part records 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part records 136.5 GB/s. The Intel part has a 46.9 GB/s higher memory bandwidth figure, which could benefit memory-intensive workloads.

ECC memory support is present on the AMD part and absent on the Intel part. PCIe support also differs. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part has a newer PCIe generation but fewer lanes.

The AMD part has a production status of Active and a release date of 2026-01-04. The Intel part also has a production status of Active and a release date of 2026-05-27. The AMD part was released earlier in the year. Neither part has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier, so both are locked for overclocking. The part numbers differ: the AMD part is 100-000001866, and the Intel part is SA4QZ.

The core and thread counts differ, as noted above. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 14 cores and 14 threads. The Intel part has more than double the core count but no simultaneous multithreading.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has an average benchmark score of 41,208 across all recorded tests.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 356H scores 41,215, which is a delta of 0 percent from the AMD part, meaning the two are effectively tied in average performance.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database shows an empty benchmark array for the Intel Arc G3, with an average benchmark score of 0 and no recorded test results.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 records 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Arc G3 records 136.5 GB/s, giving the Intel part a higher memory bandwidth figure.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Arc G3 does not.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads.