AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear overall winner in the PassMark benchmark suite: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 takes 9 of the 11 head-to-head comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins only 2. The most decisive margin belongs to the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 in the find prime numbers test, where it scores 77 against 62, a 24.2% advantage. That is the largest single delta between the two parts. Data compression also favors the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 by a solid margin: 256420 versus 237484, an 8% difference. Extended instructions show an 8.5% lead for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (18456 vs 17003), and random string sorting goes to the same chip by 7.1% (27252 vs 25435). The encryption test is closer but still favors the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440: 12418 vs 11814, a 5.1% edge. Integer math shows a 4% lead (65991 vs 63475), while multithread performance is 5.7% higher on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 (21054 vs 19927). The physics test is a narrow win for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440: 1119 vs 1089, or 2.8%. Floating point math is nearly a tie, with the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 ahead by just 0.7% (42934 vs 42621).

The two wins for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 come in the single-threaded tests. Both the PassMark single thread and singlethread entries record 3875 for the Ryzen AI 7 345 versus 3785 for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440, a 2.3% advantage. This means the Ryzen AI 7 345 has a modest but consistent edge in lightly threaded workloads, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 dominates in heavily threaded and math-intensive tasks. The overall average benchmark score reflects this split: the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 averages 41208 across all recorded benchmarks, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 averages 29461. The percentile ranking also differs: the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 sits at the 81st percentile.

When compared to external rivals in the database, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 posts an average score of 41208, placing it within 0.1% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 366H (41263) and effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (41215, delta 0%). It also sits 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X (41376) and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (40967). The Ryzen AI 7 345, by contrast, averages 29461, which is within 0.2% of the AMD EPYC 9654 (29409) and essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X (29447, delta 0%). It runs 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500HX (29270) and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE (29656). These figures place the two AMD chips in different performance tiers despite sharing the same core and thread count.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on the TSMC 4 nm process node and use the same AMD Socket FP8. They also share the same base clock of 2.00 GHz and the same 28 W TDP. The core configuration is identical on paper: 6 cores and 12 threads. The L1 cache is the same at 80 KB per core, and the L2 cache is also the same at 1 MB per core. The key architectural divergence is in the L3 cache and the codename. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which is built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Its L3 cache is 8 MB. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 uses the Krackan Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, also built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, but its L3 cache is only 4 MB. That 4 MB difference in L3 cache is the most likely contributor to the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440's lead in multithreaded and cache-sensitive tests such as data compression, integer math, and random string sorting.

The boost clocks differ as well. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 boosts to 4.60 GHz. That 0.20 GHz boost advantage for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 helps explain its higher multithread score, but it does not translate into a single-thread win. The Ryzen AI 7 345 records a higher single-thread score despite the lower boost clock, which suggests the 4 MB L3 cache is not the only factor at play. The memory subsystem is identical: both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The PCIe configuration differs slightly: the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Ryzen AI 7 345 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). ECC memory support is present on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 but absent on the Ryzen AI 7 345. Both chips integrate the same Radeon 840M graphics solution. The production status for both is Active. The Ryzen AI 7 345 has an earlier release date of 2025-01-14, while the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 was released on 2026-01-04. Neither chip has a recorded launch MSRP. The part numbers differ: 100-000001866 for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 and 100-000002122 for the Ryzen AI 7 345. The die size is recorded only for the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 at 195 mm²; no die size is listed for the Ryzen AI 7 345.

Where Each One Wins

The AMID Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins across nearly the entire PassMark suite. Its 8% lead in data compression and 7.1% lead in random string sorting point to strong performance in workloads that repeatedly access memory and cache. The 24.2% lead in find prime numbers is the kind of result that shows up in number-crunching tasks with heavy branch evaluation. The 5.7% multithread lead and 4% integer math lead make it the better choice for parallel workloads such as rendering, compilation, and scientific computation. The 5.1% encryption edge and 8.5% extended instructions edge further reinforce the picture of a chip that handles both cryptographic and SIMD-style workloads faster. The physics result, 2.8% ahead, adds another win in simulation-style tasks.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345, on the other hand, wins only in the single-threaded tests. Its 2.3% lead in PassMark single thread (3875 vs 3785) is the sole bright spot. This matters for applications that cannot use more than one or two cores, such as some legacy software, certain scripting workloads, and lightly threaded games. The Ryzen AI 7 345 also has a lower L3 cache at 4 MB, which may explain why it loses in cache-sensitive multithreaded tests despite its single-thread advantage. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440's higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz does not guarantee a single-thread win, but the Ryzen AI 7 345's 4.60 GHz boost clock is enough to take that specific metric. Overall, the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is the stronger chip in every multithreaded category, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 reserves its advantage for single-thread responsiveness.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 as the faster processor in the majority of workloads. Its 9-to-2 win record in the head-to-head tests is unambiguous, and the margins in many tests are substantial. The average benchmark score of 41208 versus 29461 places the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 in a different performance class, with a percentile rank of 87 versus 81. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 also has twice the L3 cache (8 MB vs 4 MB), a higher boost clock (4.80 GHz vs 4.60 GHz), 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 14, and ECC memory support, all in the same 28 W TDP envelope. The Ryzen AI 7 345 counters with a 2.3% single-thread advantage, but that single metric does not offset the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440's leads in multithread, cache-heavy, and math workloads. For users who prioritize parallel performance, memory bandwidth sensitivity, and ECC support, the data supports the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440. For users whose primary workloads are strictly single-threaded, the Ryzen AI 7 345 has a measurable but small edge. The release dates differ by roughly a year, with the Ryzen AI 7 345 released earlier, but the recorded production status for both is Active. The die size of the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 is listed at 195 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Ryzen AI 7 345.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 wins 9 of the 11 head-to-head PassMark tests. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins the remaining 2.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest gap is in the find prime numbers test, where the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 scores 77 versus 62, a 24.2% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 win any test?

A: Yes, the Ryzen AI 7 345 wins the PassMark single thread and singlethread tests, both with a score of 3875 versus 3785, a 2.3% lead.

Q: How do the cache configurations differ?

A: Both have 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 has 8 MB of L3, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 has 4 MB of L3.

Q: Do the two chips use the same memory and graphics?

A: Yes, both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and both integrate the Radeon 840M.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 averages 41208, while the Ryzen AI 7 345 averages 29461. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 sits at the 87th percentile, the Ryzen AI 7 345 at the 81st.

Q: Do both chips have the same core count and TDP?

A: Yes, both have 6 cores, 12 threads, a 2.00 GHz base clock, and a 28 W TDP.

Q: Is ECC memory supported on both?

A: No. ECC memory is supported on the Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 but not on the Ryzen AI 7 345.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded fields:

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440 | AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Krackan Point |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 4 MB |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) |

| ECC Memory | true | false |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2025-01-14 |

| Part Number | 100-000001866 | 100-000002122 |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | null |

All other specifications are identical: 6 cores, 12 threads, 2.00 GHz base clock, 28 W TDP, AMD Socket FP8, TSMC 4 nm process node, 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, DDR5/LPDDR5X memory support, dual-channel memory bus, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, Radeon 840M integrated graphics, Mobile market segment, Active production status, no unlocked multiplier, and no recorded launch MSRP.