AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Gorgon Point
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14700T

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 20 Cores / 28 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.3 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
253,484
354,216
passmark_data_encryption
12,111
21,277
passmark_extended_instructions
18,697
20,052
passmark_find_prime_numbers
55
145
passmark_floating_point_math
43,494
79,042
passmark_integer_math
63,707
113,854
passmark_multithread
20,285
30,571
passmark_physics
999
1,946
passmark_random_string_sorting
27,407
38,546
passmark_single_thread
3,829
3,905
passmark_singlethread
3,829
3,905
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
2,618
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
369
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,911
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,540
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
25,980
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
3,667

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G vs Intel Core i7-14700T

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the Intel Core i7-14700T and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G is decisively one-sided. Across all 11 recorded head-to-head tests, the Intel processor takes the win, with the AMD part failing to secure a single benchmark victory.

The largest margin comes in the prime number calculation test, where the Intel chip scores 145 against AMD's 55, a difference of 163.6%. This is a workload that heavily favors the Intel architecture's raw integer throughput and thread count. Similarly, in floating-point math, the Intel processor delivers 79042 points versus 43494 for the AMD, an advantage of 81.7%. The physics simulation test shows a 94.8% gap, with Intel scoring 1946 to AMD's 999.

Multi-threaded performance is a clear differentiator. The Intel Core i7-14700T scores 30571 in the multithread test, which is 50.7% higher than the AMD's 20285. This aligns with the core and thread count disparity, where Intel fields 20 cores and 28 threads against AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads. The data encryption test shows the largest percentage gap outside of prime numbers, with Intel at 21277 and AMD at 12111, a 75.7% difference. Integer math follows closely, with Intel at 113854 versus AMD's 63707, a 78.7% advantage.

The margins narrow considerably in single-threaded workloads. In the single-thread test, Intel scores 3905 and AMD scores 3829, a difference of just 2%. This indicates that while the Intel part dominates in parallel workloads, the per-core performance of the AMD Zen 5 architecture is competitive. The extended instructions test also shows a relatively modest gap, with Intel at 20052 and AMD at 18697, a 7.2% difference. Data compression favors Intel at 354216 versus 253484, a 39.7% gap, while random string sorting shows Intel ahead at 38546 versus 27407, a 40.6% margin.

The average benchmark score reinforces the pattern. The Intel chip records an average of 41914, while the AMD part averages 40718. The Intel processor sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, and the AMD part is at the 87th percentile. The nearest rivals for the Intel part include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS with an average score of 41963 and a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41779 with a delta of 0.3%. For the AMD part, the nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 6357P at 40630 with a delta of 0.2% and the Intel Core 5 223PE at 40585 with a delta of 0.3%.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700T wins in every recorded benchmark category, so the use-case split is straightforward. The processor is the clear choice for heavily threaded workloads such as video rendering, 3D modeling, scientific computation, and any application that can utilize its 28 threads. The multithread score of 30571 and the physics score of 1946 indicate strong performance in simulation and physics-based tasks. The data compression score of 354216 and the encryption score of 21277 suggest that the Intel chip is well-suited for file archiving, database operations, and security-related workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G, despite losing every test, shows its closest competition in single-threaded and extended instruction workloads. The single-thread score of 3829 is only 2% behind Intel, which means that for lightly threaded applications such as web browsing, office productivity, and general desktop responsiveness, the AMD part is nearly equivalent. The extended instructions score of 18697 is within 7.2% of Intel, indicating decent performance in workloads that use modern instruction sets, such as some encryption and multimedia tasks. However, the AMD part's multithread score of 20285 is substantially lower, so it is not recommended for heavily parallel workloads.

The AMD part does have a higher base clock at 2.00 GHz compared to Intel's 1.30 GHz, but the Intel boost clock of 5.20 GHz exceeds AMD's 4.50 GHz. The AMD chip also has a higher TDP at 65 watts versus Intel's 35 watts, which suggests that the Intel part may be more power-efficient in sustained workloads, though the database does not include direct power consumption measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Intel Core i7-14700T is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process node. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G is built on the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, and uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The process node difference is notable, with AMD's 4 nm process being a smaller node, but the benchmark results do not show a corresponding advantage in performance.

The core configuration is the most significant difference. Intel offers 20 cores and 28 threads, while AMD offers 6 cores and 12 threads. This is a substantial disparity in parallel processing capability. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. The Intel chip's higher boost clock contributes to its single-thread advantage, though the margin is small.

Cache hierarchies also differ. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and only 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip's much larger L3 cache is likely a factor in its data compression and random string sorting wins, as these workloads benefit from larger cache pools. The AMD part has a memory bandwidth rating of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part does not have a recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Memory support differs as well. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while AMD supports only DDR5, also dual-channel. Both processors support ECC memory. The Intel chip uses the Intel Socket 1700, while the AMD chip uses the AMD Socket AM5. PCIe support is different, with Intel offering Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and AMD offering Gen 4 with 10 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are also distinct, with Intel featuring UHD Graphics 770 and AMD featuring Radeon 840M.

The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $384. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP in the database. The Intel chip was released on January 7, 2024, while the AMD chip has a release date of March 1, 2026. Both are currently marked as active production parts. The Intel processor has a die size of 257 mm², while the AMD part's die size is not recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The Intel Core i7-14700T is the superior processor in every measured workload. The 20-core, 28-thread configuration provides a massive advantage in multi-threaded tasks, as evidenced by the 50.7% lead in the multithread test and the 94.8% lead in physics simulation. The large L3 cache of 33 MB helps in data-heavy workloads, where the Intel chip leads by 39.7% in compression and 40.6% in string sorting.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G is not without merit. Its single-thread performance is within 2% of the Intel chip, meaning that for everyday desktop tasks and lightly threaded applications, the user experience would be very similar. The 4 nm process node from TSMC and the higher base clock of 2.00 GHz suggest that the AMD part may be more efficient in certain low-load scenarios, but the database does not provide power measurements to confirm this.

For users who prioritize multi-core performance, rendering, simulation, or any parallel workload, the Intel Core i7-14700T is the clear choice. The data shows that the Intel part outperforms the AMD part by significant margins in all such tests. For users who only run single-threaded applications and do not need the massive thread count, the AMD part could be considered, but the Intel chip still wins those tests as well.

The percentile rankings are close, with Intel at the 88th percentile and AMD at the 87th percentile, but the average benchmark score of 41914 for Intel versus 40718 for AMD confirms the Intel chip's overall advantage. The nearest rival data for the Intel chip includes the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, which is essentially tied, and the Intel Core i7-12850HX, which is slightly behind. For the AMD chip, its nearest rivals are all Intel parts, with the Intel Xeon 6357P being the closest.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-threaded benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T is significantly faster. It scores 30571 in the multithread test, which is 50.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G's score of 20285.

Q: How do the two compare in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T wins with a score of 3905, but the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G is close at 3829, a margin of only 2%.

Q: What is the core and thread count for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G has 4 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What is the release date difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T was released on January 7, 2024. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G has a release date of March 1, 2026.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has a TDP of 35 watts. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G has a TDP of 65 watts.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 5 PRO 435G
i7-14700T
Core Specs
Cores
6
20 +233.3%
Threads
12
28 +133.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.3 -35.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.3 -35.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Multiplier
20
13 -35.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
35 -46.2%
PL1
—
35 W
PL2
—
106 W
PPT
88 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
—
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
—
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
X870E, X870, B850, B840, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, A620
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 4, 10 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
900 MHz up to 3.7 GHz
P-Core Turbo
—
5.0 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$384
Part Number
100-000001783
SRN41
Package
FC-LGA1718
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
95°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G Details View Core i7-14700T Details