AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G takes the overall win count in direct comparisons, securing 6 wins against Intel's 5. The most decisive victory for AMD comes in extended instructions, where it scores 18697 against Intel's 14562, a commanding 28.4% advantage. This indicates a substantial lead in workloads that leverage specialized CPU instruction sets, a clear architectural strength for the Zen 5 based part.

Single-thread performance also favors AMD. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G posts a score of 3829 in the PassMark single-thread test, beating the Core i5-14400T's 3512 by 9%. This advantage is consistent across both recorded single-thread entries. The margin is notable, suggesting the AMD part delivers higher per-core throughput despite having fewer cores.

Data compression is another area of clear AMD superiority. The Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G scores 253484 versus 235636 for Intel, a 7.6% lead. Similarly, in random string sorting, AMD wins with 27407 against 25181, an 8.8% edge. These results point to stronger memory and cache handling in specific data manipulation tasks.

The multithread benchmark is extremely close. AMD edges out Intel with a score of 20285 against 20223, a margin of just 0.3%. This near-parity is remarkable given that Intel has 10 cores and 16 threads versus AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads. The data shows AMD's higher per-core efficiency compensates for the core count disadvantage in this particular test.

Intel's wins are concentrated in different areas. The largest Intel victory is in prime number finding, where it scores 73 against AMD's 55, a 24.7% advantage. This suggests an edge in certain integer-heavy, low-level computational loops. Intel also dominates in physics calculations, scoring 1244 versus AMD's 999, a 19.7% lead.

Floating-point math goes to Intel as well, with a score of 49139 against 43494, an 11.5% gap. Data encryption also favors Intel, with 13244 versus 12111, an 8.6% advantage. In integer math, Intel wins narrowly, 65667 against 63707, a 3% margin. This split shows Intel's hybrid core arrangement (likely combining performance and efficiency cores) excels in sustained throughput tasks, while AMD's unified design wins on bursty, single-thread-sensitive operations.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different foundations. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14400T is a Raptor Lake-R part, part of the Core 14th Gen series, using the older 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry.

Core configuration differs significantly. AMD provides 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel provides 10 cores and 16 threads. This is a 4-core and 4-thread advantage for Intel, which explains its wins in heavily parallel workloads like physics and floating-point math. However, AMD's base clock is higher at 2.00 GHz versus Intel's 1.50 GHz. Both parts reach the same boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Cache hierarchies are distinct. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. AMD uses 1 MB of L2 per core, while Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is where the gap widens: AMD has only 4 MB total, while Intel has 20 MB shared. Despite this 5x disadvantage in L3 capacity, AMD still wins in data compression and random string sorting, indicating its memory subsystem is highly efficient for certain access patterns.

Memory support differs. AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel does not provide a comparable figure in the database. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also diverges: AMD provides Gen 4 with 10 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives Intel a significant advantage in available bandwidth for discrete GPUs and high-speed storage.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part has a higher TDP at 65 watts versus Intel's 35 watts, which is surprising given AMD's smaller process node. This suggests AMD is trading power for clock speed and efficiency in a different manner than Intel.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split based on workload type. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G is the stronger choice for single-threaded and instruction-sensitive tasks. Its 9% single-thread lead, 28.4% extended instructions advantage, and wins in data compression and random string sorting indicate a processor that excels in responsive, latency-sensitive applications and modern software that uses advanced CPU instructions.

The Intel Core i5-14400T is the better option for raw multi-threaded throughput in specific domains. Its wins in physics, floating-point math, prime number finding, and data encryption show a processor that can push through sustained computational loads, likely due to its extra 4 cores and larger 20 MB L3 cache. The near-tie in the multithread benchmark, however, means Intel's core advantage does not translate into a universal win.

For the average desktop user, the AMD part's single-thread dominance and higher average benchmark score (40718 versus 27166) make it the more versatile processor. The Intel part's wins are real but concentrated in niche workloads. The AMD part also sits in the 87th percentile versus all CPUs, while Intel sits in the 79th percentile, a clear indicator of overall positioning.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G scores 3829 in the PassMark single-thread test, compared to the Intel Core i5-14400T's 3512, giving AMD a 9% lead.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the most significant benchmark margin between the two?

A: The largest margin is in extended instructions, where AMD scores 18697 against Intel's 14562, a 28.4% advantage for AMD.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G and the Intel Core i5-14400T support ECC memory.

Q: What is the multithread benchmark result?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G scores 20285, and the Intel Core i5-14400T scores 20223. AMD wins by a slim 0.3% margin.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G has only 4 MB.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G wins in six benchmark categories: data compression, extended instructions, multithread, random string sorting, and both single-thread tests. These wins suggest strengths in software compilation, scripting workloads, database operations, and any application that benefits from rapid single-core response times. The extended instructions win is particularly relevant for modern media encoders, cryptographic hashing algorithms, and simulation software that uses AVX or similar instruction sets.

The Intel Core i5-14400T wins in five categories: data encryption, prime number finding, floating-point math, integer math, and physics. These wins indicate strengths in scientific computing, financial modeling, 3D rendering physics simulations, and encryption-heavy workloads like VPN traffic or disk encryption. The physics win is notable for gaming, where physics calculations can be a bottleneck, though the overall multithread tie tempers this advantage.

For a desktop workstation handling mixed productivity, the AMD part's higher average benchmark score (40718 versus 27166) and its wins in common tasks like compression and sorting make it the more balanced choice. For a system dedicated to number-crunching or encryption, the Intel part's specific wins could be more valuable, despite its lower overall average.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G | Intel Core i5-14400T |

|:--------------|:------------------------|:---------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 10 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not specified |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 10 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Release Date | 2026-03-01 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part Number | 100-000001783 | SRN3N |

| Die Size | Not specified | 215 mm² |