AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and the Intel Core i7-14700T?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T boosts up to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE boosts to 4.80 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and the Intel Core i7-14700T support ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14700T uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 8 MB of L3 cache on the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i7-14700T?

A: The launch MSRP is $384. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700T wins decisively in every recorded benchmark category. Its 20-core, 28-thread configuration delivers massive parallel throughput, and the data confirms this across all Cinebench and PassMark tests. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE, with only 6 cores and 12 threads, cannot match that raw core count advantage.

For single-threaded workloads, the Intel chip still leads, but the gap narrows. The i7-14700T scores 3905 in PassMark single-thread tests, while the Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no recorded score in the database, meaning the Intel part is the only one with verified data for that metric. The i7's 5.20 GHz boost clock gives it an edge in lightly threaded tasks.

The AMD processor wins on platform efficiency. It uses a smaller 4 nm process from TSMC compared to Intel's 10 nm node, which suggests better power efficiency per transistor. However, the benchmark database contains no performance measurements for the Ryzen AI 5 440GE, so its actual wins cannot be quantified from the recorded data.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. This mixed-core design allows the processor to balance high-performance and high-efficiency cores within a single package. The chip is manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process and has a die size of 195 mm².

The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The die size is 257 mm², which is larger than the AMD chip despite the older process node.

Both processors use dual-channel memory. The AMD chip supports DDR5 only, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. This gives the Intel platform more flexibility for builders who want to reuse older DDR4 memory.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel Core i7-14700T uses UHD Graphics 770. No benchmark scores are recorded for either iGPU in the database.

PCIe support also differs. The AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip supports Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel platform offers both newer PCIe technology and more lanes for expansion devices.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ substantially: 6 cores and 12 threads on the AMD side versus 20 cores and 28 threads on the Intel side. The Intel chip has more than triple the cores and more than double the threads.

Base clocks differ: the AMD chip runs at 2.00 GHz base, while the Intel chip runs at 1.30 GHz base. The boost clocks flip the comparison, with the Intel chip reaching 5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz on the AMD chip.

Both processors have a 35 W TDP, placing them in the same power envelope despite their different core counts.

The sockets are incompatible. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700.

L2 cache differs per core: both have 80 KB L1 per core, but the AMD chip has 1 MB L2 per core while the Intel chip has 2 MB L2 per core. L3 cache is 8 MB on the AMD chip versus 33 MB shared on the Intel chip.

Memory bandwidth is recorded for the AMD chip at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip has no recorded bandwidth figure. Memory support differs: DDR5 only for AMD, DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel.

The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel chip is locked. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $384; the AMD chip has no recorded MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark scores for the Intel Core i7-14700T across multiple Cinebench and PassMark tests. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has zero recorded benchmark scores, meaning the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the Intel chip's measured performance and the AMD chip's specifications.

In Cinebench R15, the Intel chip scores 2618 in multi-core and 369 in single-core. The R20 test shows 10911 in multi-core and 1540 in single-core. The R23 test records 25980 in multi-core and 3667 in single-core. These results confirm strong scaling from the 20-core configuration.

PassMark tests show similar dominance. The Intel chip scores 30571 in multithread, 3905 in single-thread, 113854 in integer math, and 79042 in floating point math. Data compression reaches 354216, while data encryption hits 21277. Extended instructions score 20052, find prime numbers scores 145, random string sorting scores 38546, and physics scores 1946.

The Intel chip's percentile versus all CPUs is 88, with an average benchmark score of 41914. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS at 41963 (-0.1% delta), the Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41779 (+0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 at 42055 (-0.3% delta), and the Intel Core 7 251TE at 41650 (+0.6% delta). These close margins show the i7-14700T sits in a competitive performance tier.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has a percentile of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the absence of recorded measurements. Without scores, no direct delta percentage can be calculated between the two processors. The Intel chip's recorded scores across every test in the database give it a clear measurement advantage, while the AMD chip's performance remains undocumented.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980 demonstrates what a 20-core, 28-thread processor can deliver in heavily threaded rendering workloads. The single-core score of 3667 indicates strong per-thread performance as well. The PassMark multithread score of 30571 reinforces the multi-core story.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear choice for users who need maximum recorded performance: the Intel Core i7-14700T. Every benchmark score in the database belongs to this processor, and the scores are strong. The 20 cores and 28 threads give it a massive advantage in multi-threaded workloads, while the 5.20 GHz boost clock helps in single-threaded tasks. The 88th percentile ranking versus all CPUs confirms it sits well above the median.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE offers no recorded benchmark data, so its actual performance cannot be verified from the database. Its specifications suggest a capable 6-core, 12-thread processor with a 4.80 GHz boost clock and a 35 W TDP. The smaller 4 nm process and smaller die size of 195 mm² indicate a more modern manufacturing approach, but the lack of measurements means that efficiency cannot be quantified.

For builders who rely on measured performance, the Intel chip is the only option with verifiable results. Its 33 MB of L3 cache, DDR4 and DDR5 support, and Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes provide additional platform flexibility. The locked multiplier is a limitation for overclocking, but the stock performance is already well documented.

The AMD chip targets a different use case: a compact 6-core part on the AM5 platform with an unlocked multiplier and a 4 nm process. It may appeal to users who prioritize platform longevity or efficiency, but the database currently offers no evidence of its performance level. The Intel chip's recorded scores, including 25980 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3905 in PassMark single-thread, make it the data-backed recommendation for anyone who wants proven results.