AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and the Intel Core i5-14400T. The Ryzen AI 5 440GE has an empty benchmark profile, meaning no Cinebench, PassMark, or other standardized scores are available for comparison. The Intel Core i5-14400T, by contrast, has a rich set of 17 recorded benchmark scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and multiple PassMark workloads.

For the Intel Core i5-14400T, the data shows a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17189 and a single-core score of 2426. In Cinebench R20, the multicore result is 7219 and the single-core result is 1018. The R15 run produced a multicore score of 1732 and a single-core score of 244. These results place the chip in the 79th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 27166.

PassMark results for the Intel part show a single-thread score of 3512 (recorded twice under slightly different test names, but with identical values), a multithread score of 20223, integer math at 65667, floating point math at 49139, and extended instructions at 14562. Data compression scores reached 235636, while data encryption hit 13244. Random string sorting produced 25181, prime number finding scored 73, and the physics test yielded 1244.

Without any recorded scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE, the head-to-head comparison cannot be quantified. The database shows zero wins for the AMD part and zero wins for the Intel part in direct comparisons. The absence of benchmark data for the Ryzen AI 5 440GE means that any performance relationship between these two processors remains undocumented in the current database. The Intel Core i5-14400T is the only one of the two with measurable results, and its nearest rivals in the database show it performs within 0.8% of the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G, 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-13700H, 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, and 0.3% of the Intel Core i9-9900K.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Ryzen AI 5 440GE has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed. The database contains no performance measurements for this processor.

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14400T's best Cinebench score?

A: The highest recorded Cinebench result for the Intel Core i5-14400T is the R23 multicore score of 17189. Its R23 single-core score is 2426, its R20 multicore score is 7219, and its R15 multicore score is 1732.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14400T compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The database lists four nearest rivals. The Intel Core i5-14400T is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, 0.7% behind the Intel Core i7-13700H, and 0.8% behind the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and the Intel Core i5-14400T list ECC memory support as true.

Q: What are the release dates for these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has a release date of 2026-02-28, and the Intel Core i5-14400T has a release date of 2024-01-07.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which is built on a hybrid of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core i5-14400T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core i5 generation under the Raptor Lake Refresh label. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 215 mm². The process node difference is substantial: the AMD part uses a 4 nm process, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process.

Cache organization differs noticeably between the two. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD part and 1.25 MB per core on the Intel part. The L3 cache shows a major divergence: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core i5-14400T has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither processor features 3D V-Cache.

The integrated graphics differ in branding and capability. The AMD part pairs with a Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The memory support also differs: the AMD processor supports only DDR5, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the AMD part records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no memory bandwidth figure listed.

PCIe support is another distinguishing factor. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core i5-14400T provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel part is locked. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket AM5, and the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14400T has 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD part and 1.50 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks are 4.80 GHz for the AMD part and 4.50 GHz for the Intel part. Both processors have a TDP of 35.

The L2 cache per core is 1 MB on the AMD part versus 1.25 MB on the Intel part. The L3 cache is 8 MB on the AMD part versus 20 MB shared on the Intel part. The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. The die size is 195 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel.

Memory support shows the AMD part restricted to DDR5, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded as 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part, with no figure for the Intel part. PCIe generation and lane counts differ: Gen 4 with 12 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel.

The integrated graphics are Radeon 840M on the AMD side and UHD Graphics 730 on the Intel side. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, the Intel part does not. The socket is AMD Socket AM5 versus Intel Socket 1700. The release dates differ by over two years, with the Intel part releasing on 2024-01-07 and the AMD part on 2026-02-28. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221.

Both processors share an active production status, a desktop market segment, dual-channel memory support, and ECC memory support. Both have the same L1 cache per core at 80 KB.

The Verdict

The database presents an asymmetric picture. The Intel Core i5-14400T has substantial recorded benchmark data, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 27166. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no recorded benchmark data, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile placement, which is effectively a neutral placeholder given the absence of measurements.

From the specification data alone, the Intel Core i5-14400T offers more cores (10 versus 6), more threads (16 versus 12), and more than double the L3 cache (20 MB versus 8 MB). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE counters with a higher boost clock (4.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz), a smaller 4 nm process node versus 10 nm, a higher recorded memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s versus no recorded figure), and an unlocked multiplier.

The Intel part has a release date of 2024-01-07 and a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD part has a later release date of 2026-02-28 and no launch MSRP listed. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR5. The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes.

For a buyer prioritizing measured performance, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only one of the two with documented benchmark results. Its nearest rival comparisons show it is competitive with the Intel Core i9-9900K and AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, both within 0.4%. For a buyer prioritizing the newer process node, higher boost clock, and unlocked multiplier, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE presents a more modern design on paper, but the database lacks any performance evidence to confirm its capabilities.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400T wins in every category where the database has actual measurements. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17189 and single-core score of 2426 establish it as a capable performer in both heavily threaded and lightly threaded workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 20223 and single-thread score of 3512 reinforce this. Its data compression score of 235636 suggests strong throughput in compression workloads, and its integer math score of 65667 indicates solid general-purpose compute. The 79th percentile placement confirms it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database.

The Intel part also wins on core count, thread count, L3 cache capacity, PCIe generation and lane count, and memory flexibility with DDR4 and DDR5 support. Its older release date means it has been available for longer, and it carries a launch MSRP of $221.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE wins on process node efficiency, with a 4 nm process versus the Intel part's 10 nm process. It has a higher base clock (2.00 GHz versus 1.50 GHz) and a higher boost clock (4.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz). It records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a figure the Intel part lacks entirely. It offers an unlocked multiplier, which the Intel part does not. Its L2 cache per core is 1 MB versus 1.25 MB, but the AMD part has a smaller die size at 195 mm² versus 215 mm².

The AMD part's socket is AM5, which is a newer platform than Intel Socket 1700. Its integrated graphics are the Radeon 840M, a more modern GPU branding than the Intel UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part's release date of 2026-02-28 places it two years newer than the Intel part.

For use cases that rely on measured, documented performance, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only processor with supporting data. For use cases that value architectural recency, a smaller process node, higher clocks, an unlocked multiplier, and a newer socket, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE offers those attributes, but the database cannot verify its actual performance without benchmark entries.