AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE vs Intel Core i5-14450HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head measurements for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE, as its benchmark array is empty. The Intel Core i5-14450HX, however, has a full set of recorded results across Cinebench and Passmark workloads. This means the comparison is one-sided in terms of verified data: the AMD processor has zero recorded wins, while the Intel processor holds all 17 documented benchmark entries.

The Intel Core i5-14450HX posts a multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 20,108 points and a single-core score of 2,838 points. In Cinebench R20, it records 8,445 multi-core and 1,191 single-core. The older R15 test shows 2,026 multi-core and 285 single-core. These results place the Intel chip at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32,040.

Passmark results for the Intel processor show a multi-thread score of 23,680 and a single-thread score of 3,643. Integer math hits 78,330, floating-point math reaches 58,037, and extended instructions score 17,207. Data compression records 278,538, data encryption scores 15,574, random string sorting lands at 29,565, and physics posts 1,475. Prime number finding is notably low at 98, which reflects a workload that does not favor the processor's architecture.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE lacks recorded benchmarks, the database shows zero wins for it and zero direct comparison points. The Intel chip's nearest rivals, all of which are within 0.6% of its average score, include the Intel Core i7-13705H at -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-14400 at -0.2%, the Intel Core i7-12800H at -0.3%, and the Intel Core i9-11900 at -0.6%. This cluster indicates the Core i5-14450HX performs on par with those four processors, with margins smaller than one percentage point in either direction.

The absence of AMD benchmark data means no exact deltas can be computed between the two processors. The only quantitative statement available is that the Intel part delivers the scores listed above, while the AMD part has no recorded performance metrics in the database. Any direct comparison of their compute capabilities must rely on the specification and architecture sections below, not on measured results.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. Its benchmark array is empty, its average benchmark score is zero, and it records zero wins in the head-to-head comparison. The Intel Core i5-14450HX holds all 17 documented benchmark entries.

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14450HX's best and worst recorded workload result?

A: Its best score is 278,538 in Passmark data compression. Its lowest is 98 in Passmark find prime numbers, a workload that appears to heavily penalize the processor's architecture.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14450HX compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: It sits within 0.6% of four other processors. The Intel Core i7-13705H is 0.1% below, the Intel Core i5-14400 is 0.2% below, the Intel Core i7-12800H is 0.3% below, and the Intel Core i9-11900 is 0.6% below.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14450HX has 10 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE and the Intel Core i5-14450HX list ECC memory support as true.

Q: What is the production status and release date for each processor?

A: Both are listed as active in production. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has a release date of February 28, 2026, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX was released on January 7, 2024.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14450HX wins every category where recorded data exists. Its multi-threaded throughput is substantial: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 20,108, R20 at 8,445, and R15 at 2,026. The Passmark multi-thread score of 23,680 reinforces this pattern, as do the integer math score of 78,330 and floating-point math score of 58,037. For workloads that stress sustained parallel execution, such as data compression at 278,538 or random string sorting at 29,565, the Intel processor demonstrates clear strength.

Single-threaded performance is also firmly in Intel's corner based on the available data. Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,838, R20 at 1,191, and R15 at 285 are all recorded, along with a Passmark single-thread score of 3,643. The extended instructions score of 17,207 and encryption score of 15,574 show competence in specialized instruction paths. The physics score of 1,475 rounds out the measured workload coverage.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE has no recorded wins because no benchmarks exist for it. In a use-case split based strictly on benchmark wins, the Intel part claims the entirety of the measured territory. The AMD processor's potential advantages would have to come from its architecture and specifications, which are covered below, rather than from any empirical performance data in the database.

For users prioritizing workloads that map to the recorded tests, the Intel Core i5-14450HX is the only option with verified results. The AMD part remains an unmeasured quantity in this database, so any claim of superiority in a given task cannot be supported by benchmark evidence. The data only supports the conclusion that Intel's processor has been tested and performs at the levels listed, while AMD's has not been tested at all.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX uses 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.40 GHz for Intel. Both boost to 4.80 GHz, making their peak single-core frequency identical.

Thermal design power differs significantly: the AMD part is rated at 35 watts, the Intel part at 55 watts. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1964. The AMD chip is marked as a desktop segment processor, whereas the Intel chip is marked as mobile. Both have unlocked multipliers, but their sockets and market segments are distinct.

Cache configurations diverge in L2 and L3. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel processor has 2 MB of L2 per core. L3 cache shows a major difference: AMD has 8 MB total, Intel has 20 MB shared. Die size also differs, with AMD at 195 mm² and Intel at 257 mm².

Memory support is another differentiator. The AMD processor supports DDR5 only, with dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but its memory bandwidth is not listed in the database. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity is asymmetric. The AMD processor offers Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE includes Radeon 840M, while the Intel Core i5-14450HX includes UHD Graphics 710.

Part numbers and release dates also differ. The AMD processor has part number 100-000001925 and a 2026 release date. The Intel processor has part number SRMXK and a 2024 release date. Neither has a launch MSRP listed in the database.

Architecture Differences

The architectures are fundamentally different. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440GE carries the codename Gorgon Point and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14450HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-HX from the Core 14th Gen series, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Intel part is a refresh of the Raptor Lake-HX design.

The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel, with different foundries (TSMC versus Intel). This affects transistor density and power characteristics, though the database does not list transistor counts for either processor. The die size difference, 195 mm² for AMD versus 257 mm² for Intel, reflects the different core counts and cache arrangements.

Core architecture also differs. The Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid approach in the AMD part is designed for efficiency and performance scaling across different thread counts. The Raptor Lake-HX refresh in the Intel part uses a more conventional high-core-count configuration, with 10 cores and 16 threads. The L3 cache difference, 8 MB for AMD versus 20 MB for Intel, is a direct architectural consequence: Intel's design allocates more shared cache for its larger core array.

The AMD processor's integrated Radeon 840M graphics represents a newer GPU architecture compared to Intel's UHD Graphics 710. PCIe generation differs, with AMD at Gen 4 and Intel at Gen 5, meaning the Intel platform supports newer peripheral bandwidth standards. Memory architecture also diverges: AMD is restricted to DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving the Intel processor broader compatibility at the cost of not specifying a peak bandwidth in the database.

The AMD part's 35 watt TDP, combined with its 4 nm process and Zen 5 / Zen 5c hybrid cores, suggests an efficiency-focused design. The Intel part's 55 watt TDP, larger die, and higher core count indicate a performance-oriented design with more power headroom. Neither processor has a listed architecture field for AMD (it is null), but the generation field confirms the Zen 5 / Zen 5c lineage. The Intel architecture field explicitly names Raptor Lake.

The release cadence reinforces the generational gap: the Intel processor launched in January 2024, while the AMD processor is dated February 2026. This places the AMD part over two years newer in the database, though its benchmark data has not been recorded. The process node, core design, and integrated graphics all point to a more recent design for AMD, but without measured results, those architectural advantages cannot be quantified in performance terms.