AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of the Intel Processor 300T?

A: The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the process nodes for these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is fabricated on a 4 nm node by TSMC, while the Intel Processor 300T uses a 10 nm node from Intel.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has a TDP of 65 watts, and the Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: What integrated graphics do they each use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G features Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel Processor 300T comes with UHD Graphics 710.

Q: What memory types are supported by each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G supports DDR5 memory only, whereas the Intel Processor 300T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, built on the Gorgon Point codename. Its architecture is based on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. This processor uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The core configuration consists of 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its cache hierarchy is laid out as 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The memory controller supports DDR5 in dual-channel mode, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported. The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU.

The Intel Processor 300T is from the Intel Processor generation, based on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename. It uses a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry, with a die size of 163 mm². This chip has 2 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no boost clock listed. Its cache structure includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is not supported. The PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The architectural split is clear. The AMD chip relies on a smaller process node, higher core count, and a larger L3 pool. The Intel chip uses an older node, fewer cores, but a higher base clock and a newer PCIe generation. The AMD part also includes a larger die area despite fewer physical resources per core in terms of L2. The Intel part allocates more L2 per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB on the AMD side.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G wins on multi-threaded workloads. The recorded benchmark scores show strong results across data compression, encryption, integer math, and multithreaded tests. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it can handle parallel tasks more effectively than the 2-core Intel Processor 300T. The data indicates a clear advantage for tasks that scale with core count, such as content rendering, code compilation, and scientific calculations.

The Intel Processor 300T wins on power efficiency and single-core frequency. Its TDP of 35 watts is substantially lower than the 65 watt TDP of the AMD part. The base clock of 3.40 GHz is higher than the AMD's 2.00 GHz base clock. For lightweight workloads, basic office tasks, or systems where heat and power draw are primary concerns, the Intel chip offers a simpler footprint.

The AMD chip also wins on memory bandwidth and ECC support. The recorded 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a significant figure for memory-intensive applications. ECC memory support makes the AMD part suitable for error-sensitive computing environments. The Intel chip does not support ECC memory.

The Intel chip wins on PCIe connectivity. It offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD chip offers Gen 4 with 12 lanes. For systems that require the latest high-bandwidth expansion cards, the Intel platform provides more headroom.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G | Intel Processor 300T |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 2 |

| Threads | 12 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 65 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part Number | 100-000001918 | SRN3K |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data for these two processors is not populated in the database. However, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has a full set of recorded PassMark scores, while the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

For the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G, the recorded scores are as follows: data compression at 292735, data encryption at 13585, extended instructions at 20648, find prime numbers at 90, floating point math at 45711, integer math at 71251, multithreaded at 23487, physics at 1329, random string sorting at 31106, and single thread at 4060. The average benchmark score is 46187.

The AMD chip's percentile ranking among all CPUs is 89. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i9-13900HX with an average score of 46098 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 with an average score of 46062 and a delta of 0.3 percent, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 with an average score of 46030 and a delta of 0.3 percent, and the AMD EPYC 4364P with an average score of 45970 and a delta of 0.5 percent. These deltas indicate that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G sits within a close performance band at the top of the database rankings.

The Intel Processor 300T has an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile ranking of 50. With no recorded benchmark results and no nearest rivals listed, the database contains no direct performance measurements for this chip.

The most meaningful comparison comes from the core and thread counts. The AMD part has three times the cores and three times the threads of the Intel part. Given the AMD chip's recorded multithreaded score of 23487, it is positioned for substantial parallel workload performance. The Intel chip's lack of recorded data means no exact comparison can be made from the database.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors with very different positioning. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is a higher-performance desktop chip with 6 cores, 12 threads, a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, and a 65 watt TDP. It sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 46187. Its nearest rivals are all high-end processors within a half-percent delta, including the Intel Core i9-13900HX and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.

The Intel Processor 300T is a low-power desktop chip with 2 cores, 4 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and a 35 watt TDP. It sits at the 50th percentile in the database, but with no recorded benchmark scores, its performance position is not measurable from the recorded data.

For users who need multi-threaded performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is the clear choice based on core count, thread count, and recorded benchmark scores. The chip's ECC memory support and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth add capabilities that the Intel part lacks. The unlocked multiplier also allows for overclocking, which the Intel part does not offer.

For users who prioritize low power draw and a simple dual-core setup, the Intel Processor 300T offers a 35 watt TDP, which is roughly half the AMD part's 65 watt TDP. The Intel chip also supports DDR4 memory, which may be more accessible for older platforms, and its PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes provides more expansion bandwidth.

The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. These are incompatible platforms, so the choice of processor dictates the motherboard selection. The AMD part was released later and uses a newer process node, while the Intel part has an earlier release date and a simpler core configuration. The recorded data favors the AMD processor for performance-oriented builds, while the Intel processor suits low-power, basic computing needs.