AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-14600 wins every single head-to-head test recorded, taking all 11 victories with zero wins for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G. For workloads measured by PassMark, the Intel part is the clear performance leader, often by margins exceeding 40%. The AMD processor, however, is not without merit: it matches the Intel chip in overall CPU percentile ranking at 89, and its average benchmark score of 46187 actually edges out the Intel's 44889, though this reflects the broader database pool rather than their direct comparison.

The choice depends entirely on workload priority. If the task is heavily multithreaded, encryption, floating-point math, or physics simulation, the Intel Core i5-14600 is the only rational pick from this data. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G, with its 6 cores and 12 threads against Intel's 14 cores and 20 threads, simply cannot keep pace. However, for users who value the platform features, the AMD part offers ECC memory support, a more recent 4 nm process node, and a 2026 release date, all while remaining competitive in single-thread performance where the gap narrows to just 2.6%. The Intel chip launched earlier, in 2024, and carries a launch MSRP of $255, a figure the database records without further commentary.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G, codenamed Gorgon Point, belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core i5-14600, part of the Core 14th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake architecture with Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process by Intel with a larger 257 mm² die.

Core configurations diverge sharply. The AMD processor has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 14 cores and 20 threads, a difference that explains the multithreaded performance gap. Cache hierarchies also differ: both use 80 KB L1 per core and 1 MB L2 per core for AMD versus 2 MB L2 per core for Intel. The critical divergence comes at L3: AMD provides 8 MB total, while Intel offers 24 MB shared L3, a threefold advantage that benefits data-heavy workloads.

Memory support shows another split. AMD supports only DDR5 with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, though the database records no bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, giving Intel a bandwidth advantage for expansion. Integrated graphics also differ, with AMD featuring the Radeon 840M and Intel the UHD Graphics 770. The AMD chip has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel does not. Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket AM5 for the AMD part, Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest margin belongs to floating-point math, where the Intel Core i5-14600 scores 85759 against AMD's 45711, a 46.7% advantage. This is a decisive gap that suggests Intel's architecture handles iterative mathematical operations with far greater efficiency. Data encryption shows a similar pattern: Intel scores 25082 versus AMD's 13585, a 45.8% lead, indicating stronger cryptographic throughput. Physics simulation follows with Intel at 2330 versus AMD's 1329, a 43% difference.

Prime number finding, a test sensitive to integer throughput, gives Intel 155 against AMD's 90, a 41.9% edge. Integer math itself shows Intel at 117078 versus AMD's 71251, a 39.1% lead. Data compression sees Intel at 434620 versus AMD's 292735, a 32.6% advantage. Random string sorting gives Intel 48043 against AMD's 31106, a 35.3% win. The multithread test, which combines many of these operations, shows Intel at 35848 versus AMD's 23487, a 34.5% lead. Extended instructions, a test for SIMD and specialized operations, gives Intel 25674 against AMD's 20648, a 19.6% margin.

The closest contest is single-thread performance. Intel scores 4167, AMD scores 4060, a slim 2.6% difference. This is the only area where the two processors approach parity, suggesting that AMD's Zen 5 cores are competitive on a per-thread basis but lose out in aggregate due to fewer cores and threads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the difference in single-thread performance?

A: The Intel chip scores 4167 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 2.6% higher than AMD's 4060. This is the smallest margin in any head-to-head test.

Q: How do the two compare in multithreaded workloads?

A: Intel scores 35848 in the PassMark multithread test, which is 34.5% higher than AMD's 23487. The gap is primarily due to the Intel chip's higher core and thread count.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and the Intel Core i5-14600 support ECC memory. However, AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has a more recent release date?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G was released on 2026-02-28, while the Intel Core i5-14600 was released on 2024-01-07.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14600 wins every recorded benchmark category, making it the superior choice for compute-heavy tasks. Its biggest advantages come in floating-point math (46.7% ahead), data encryption (45.8% ahead), and physics simulation (43% ahead). For users running scientific simulations, financial modeling, video encoding, or any workload that scales with core count, the Intel chip's 14 cores and 20 threads deliver a 34.5% multithread lead that is difficult to ignore. Data compression and random string sorting, common in database and file management tasks, also favor Intel by 32.6% and 35.3% respectively. The Intel chip's 24 MB of shared L3 cache likely contributes to these wins, as does its Gen 5 PCIe with 16 lanes for faster peripheral connectivity.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G, despite losing all head-to-head tests, has its own strengths within the recorded data. Its 4 nm process node suggests better power efficiency, though no wattage or thermal figures are in the database to confirm. The AMD chip's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is a recorded figure, and its ECC support plus DDR5-only design may appeal to users building reliability-focused systems. The unlocked multiplier is a notable feature for overclocking, absent from the Intel part. In single-thread performance, the AMD chip trails by only 2.6%, meaning everyday responsive tasks like web browsing or office work would show little practical difference. The AMD chip also has a smaller die size at 195 mm² versus Intel's 257 mm², which may indicate lower manufacturing costs, though pricing data is not available for the AMD part.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G | Intel Core i5-14600 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 14 |

| Threads | 12 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $255 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

The two chips also share some traits: both have 80 KB L1 cache per core, both are dual-channel for memory, both support ECC, both are in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, and both are classified as desktop processors with a 65 TDP. The Intel chip's higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus AMD's 4.80 GHz helps explain its single-thread edge, while the TDP parity suggests similar thermal envelopes, though the database records no cooling or power consumption measurements beyond these figures.