AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and Intel Processor 300 occupy entirely different performance tiers, making the head-to-head comparison one-sided in nearly every measurable category. The recorded data shows the AMD part scoring an average benchmark result of 46187, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Processor 300 holds a 50th percentile ranking with no individual benchmark scores recorded in the database, which limits direct comparison to aggregate metrics and architectural characteristics.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G delivers a multi-thread score of 23487 in the PassMark multithread test, a figure that reflects its six cores and twelve threads. The Intel Processor 300 offers only two cores and four threads, and benchmark results indicate the AMD part’s thread count advantage translates directly into superior parallel workload performance. In single-thread performance, the AMD chip records a score of 4060, while the Intel chip shows no recorded single-thread benchmark, leaving the comparison to rely on the AMD part’s documented capabilities.

The AMD processor’s integer math score of 71251 and floating point math score of 45711 demonstrate strong arithmetic throughput, while its data compression score of 292735 highlights efficient handling of compression workloads. The encryption test shows a score of 13585 for the AMD chip, and the extended instructions test records 20648. The random string sorting benchmark returns 31106 for the AMD part, and the physics test yields 1329. The find prime numbers test shows a modest score of 90, indicating that single-threaded prime calculation is not a standout strength for the AMD chip despite its overall competitive positioning.

The nearest rival data for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G places it within a tight cluster of high-end processors. The Intel Core i9-13900HX posts an average score of 46098, a 0.2% delta from the AMD chip’s 46187. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 records 46062, a 0.3% delta. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030, also a 0.3% delta, and the AMD EPYC 4364P reaches 45970, a 0.5% delta. These figures indicate the Ryzen AI 5 440G performs essentially on par with a 2023 flagship mobile HX processor and a current mid-range desktop Ultra part, despite having fewer cores than some of those rivals. The Intel Processor 300 has no nearest rival data, which reflects its lower standing in the database’s performance hierarchy.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation built on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c architecture. Its process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Processor 300 employs the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-S, and uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². These process node differences are substantial: the AMD chip uses a significantly more advanced fabrication process, which typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency per unit of work.

Cache configurations vary notably between the two. The AMD processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with a total of 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor matches the AMD chip’s 80 KB per-core L1 cache but offers a larger 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core. Its L3 cache totals 6 MB shared across the two cores. The AMD part’s larger L3 pool serves six cores and twelve threads, while the Intel chip’s smaller shared L3 serves only two cores and four threads, giving the AMD design a more generous cache-to-thread ratio.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD chip supports DDR5 memory exclusively with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing platform flexibility, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for the Intel part. ECC memory support is present on the AMD chip, while the Intel processor lacks ECC capability, a relevant distinction for workstation or server-adjacent deployments where error correction matters.

PCIe connectivity differs in both generation and lane count. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G offers PCIe Gen 4 with 12 CPU lanes. The Intel Processor 300 provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, representing a newer generation and more lanes for direct CPU-attached devices. This gives the Intel chip a theoretical advantage in raw I/O bandwidth for compatible peripherals, though the AMD chip’s lane count is sufficient for many desktop configurations.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G wins decisively in multithreaded and compute-heavy workloads. Its six cores and twelve threads, combined with a 4.80 GHz boost clock and 8 MB of L3 cache, position it for productivity tasks that scale across cores. The benchmark data shows strong scores in integer math, floating point math, data compression, and encryption, indicating proficiency in scientific computing, media encoding, and data processing. The 89th percentile ranking places it among the top tier of desktop processors, comparable to the Intel Core i9-13900HX and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, both of which are higher-end parts in their respective lineups.

The Intel Processor 300 wins in platform flexibility and I/O capability. Its support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory allows builders to choose based on existing components or cost preferences, a feature the AMD chip does not offer. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides a forward-looking connection for next-generation GPUs and NVMe storage. The Intel chip also operates at a 3.90 GHz base clock across its two cores, which is higher than the AMD chip’s 2.00 GHz base clock, though the AMD part’s boost clock of 4.80 GHz exceeds the Intel chip’s maximum (the database lists no boost clock for the Intel part). For single-threaded tasks that rely on high sustained clocks without boosting, the Intel chip’s higher base frequency could provide consistent performance, though no benchmark data confirms this.

The AMD chip’s integrated Radeon 840M graphics likely deliver superior iGPU performance compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 710, though the database does not include graphics benchmark scores. The AMD part’s unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, while the Intel processor’s multiplier is locked, giving the AMD chip additional headroom for enthusiasts who want to extract more performance beyond stock settings.

The Verdict

The database clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G for users who prioritize computational throughput and multithreaded performance. Its average benchmark score of 46187 versus the Intel Processor 300’s lack of recorded scores, its 89th versus 50th percentile ranking, and its six-core versus two-core configuration make the AMD chip the stronger choice for workloads such as software compilation, video rendering, data analysis, and virtualization. The AMD part’s 4 nm process node, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and ECC support further reinforce its position as a more capable desktop processor.

The Intel Processor 300 suits users who value memory compatibility and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. Its dual DDR4/DDR5 support and 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide a versatile foundation for a basic desktop system, particularly one where the user already owns DDR4 memory or requires the latest PCIe standard for a specific expansion card. The Intel chip’s 46 W TDP, lower than the AMD chip’s 65 W TDP, suggests it may be easier to cool in compact systems, though the database provides no thermal or acoustic measurements.

For the majority of desktop users who need a processor that handles both everyday tasks and demanding parallel workloads, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is the data-backed choice. For users building a minimal, low-power system with legacy memory or specific PCIe Gen 5 requirements, the Intel Processor 300 offers a narrower but still valid set of advantages. The launch MSRP for the Intel Processor 300 is $82, which appears once in this analysis as a reference point; the AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has an average benchmark score of 46187. The Intel Processor 300 has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, with no individual test scores recorded.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G supports DDR5 memory only. The Intel Processor 300 supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Intel Processor 300 has a base clock of 3.90 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G’s base clock of 2.00 GHz. However, the AMD chip’s boost clock is 4.80 GHz, while the Intel chip has no recorded boost clock.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC. The Intel Processor 300 uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G | Intel Processor 300 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 2 |

| Threads | 12 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 65 W | 46 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 6 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | Yes | No |

| Release Date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $82 |

| Part Number | 100-000001918 | SRN3J |