AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is extensive, with eleven Passmark workload scores captured. The Intel Core 7 150UL, however, has no benchmark scores recorded in the database, making a direct per-test comparison impossible. The analysis must therefore rely on the AMD part's absolute scores, its percentile ranking, and its nearest rivals to establish a performance context.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G posts an average benchmark score of 46,187. This places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, based on average score, include the Intel Core i9-13900HX at 46,098 (0.2% behind), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 at 46,062 (0.3% behind), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 at 46,030 (0.3% behind), and the AMD EPYC 4364P at 45,970 (0.5% behind). These deltas are all sub-1%, indicating the Ryzen AI 5 440G sits at the very top of a tightly clustered group of high-performing processors.

Looking at the individual workload scores for the AMD chip, the strongest result is in Passmark data compression, where it records 292,735. This is by far its largest raw score, and it indicates a particular strength in workloads that can leverage the processor's compression engine or high memory throughput. The data encryption score of 13,585 and the extended instructions score of 20,648 show solid, but less spectacular, results. The integer math score of 71,251 and the floating point math score of 45,711 are both substantial, with integer math outpacing floating point by about 56%. The multithread score of 23,487 is a key indicator of overall throughput, and the single-thread score of 4,060 (recorded in two separate fields) shows the per-core capability. The random string sorting score of 31,106 and the physics score of 1,329 round out the suite. The find prime numbers score of 90 is a smaller value but is a valid recorded datapoint for that specific test.

Because the Intel Core 7 150UL has zero recorded benchmarks and an average benchmark score of 0, it cannot be placed on the same performance scale. Its percentile ranking of 50th percentile is listed in the database, but without workload data, this cannot be corroborated with specific scores. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, confirming that no direct test-by-test comparison data exists. The wins counters for both items are zero, which is consistent with the absence of head-to-head records. The analytical conclusion is that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has a complete performance profile in the database, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has none.

The Verdict

From the data as recorded, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is the only processor of the two with measurable benchmark performance. It holds an 89th percentile ranking against all CPUs and an average score of 46,187, which places it 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-13900HX, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 235, 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4364P. These are marginal leads, but they are leads nonetheless, and they demonstrate that the Ryzen AI 5 440G is competitive with some of the strongest processors in the database.

The Intel Core 7 150UL, in contrast, has no recorded scores. It is listed with a 50th percentile ranking, but the database contains no benchmark data to support any performance claim. For any user relying on the database's measurements, the AMD part is the only option with verifiable performance. The Intel part's zero average score means it cannot be recommended on the basis of any recorded workload result.

The choice is therefore clear from the data: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is the processor with demonstrable performance, while the Intel Core 7 150UL is a processor without any recorded performance data. The AMD chip's position in the 89th percentile and its narrow but consistent lead over four strong rivals in the nearest rivals list makes it the only defensible pick when the analysis is restricted to the recorded facts.

Architecture Differences

The two processors differ substantially in their underlying designs, and these differences are documented in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G uses 6 cores and 12 threads. It is built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². Its codename is Gorgon Point, and it belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which the database describes as Zen 5 / Zen 5c. The base clock is 2.00 GHz and the boost clock is 4.80 GHz. The TDP is 65 watts. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 and has an unlocked multiplier. Its cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It supports ECC memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are the Radeon 840M. It was released on 2026-02-28 and has part number 100-000001918.

The Intel Core 7 150UL uses 10 cores and 12 threads. It is built on a 10 nm process node at Intel, with no die size recorded. Its architecture is Raptor Lake, with the codename Raptor Lake-PS, and it belongs to the Core 7 generation (Raptor Lake-PS). The base clock is 1.70 GHz and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz. The TDP is 15 watts. It uses the Intel Socket 1700 and has a locked multiplier. Its cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. The memory support is DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. It does not support ECC memory. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are the Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. It was released on 2024-04-07, and its part number is unknown.

Several differences stand out. The AMD chip has fewer cores (6 versus 10) but the same thread count (12). The AMD chip has a higher base clock (2.00 GHz versus 1.70 GHz) but a lower boost clock (4.80 GHz versus 5.00 GHz). The AMD chip has a much higher TDP (65 watts versus 15 watts), which indicates a different power envelope. The process nodes differ significantly: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The memory support differs: AMD supports only DDR5 while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. AMD includes ECC support, Intel does not. The PCIe lane counts differ: 12 lanes for AMD versus 8 lanes for Intel. The L3 cache is larger on the Intel part (12 MB shared versus 8 MB), and the L2 per core is also larger (1.25 MB versus 1 MB). The integrated graphics differ: Radeon 840M for AMD versus Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for Intel. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, the Intel part does not. The release dates differ, with the Intel part coming out in 2024 and the AMD part in 2026.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has an average benchmark score of 46,187, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 150UL have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the Intel Core 7 150UL has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals listed in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G compare to its closest rivals?

A: It leads the Intel Core i9-13900HX by 0.2%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by 0.3%, and the AMD EPYC 4364P by 0.5% in average score.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has a TDP of 65 watts. The Intel Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 7 150UL does not.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G wins in every measurable category, simply because it is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark data. Its 89th percentile ranking and 46,187 average score give it a clear advantage in overall performance. Its specific workload scores show strength in data compression at 292,735, which is its highest recorded result. It also delivers strong integer math at 71,251 and floating point math at 45,711. Its single-thread score of 4,060 and multithread score of 23,487 show balanced capability across both single-core and multi-core tasks. The data encryption score of 13,585 and extended instructions score of 20,648 add to its profile.

The Intel Core 7 150UL has no wins in any benchmark category, as no scores are recorded. It does, however, have structural advantages in the database that could matter in non-benchmark contexts. Its TDP of 15 watts is far lower than the AMD chip's 65 watts, which indicates a much lower power draw. It has 10 cores versus 6, though the thread count is identical at 12. It has a larger L3 cache (12 MB shared versus 8 MB) and a larger L2 per core (1.25 MB versus 1 MB). Its boost clock is higher at 5.00 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, whereas the AMD chip supports only DDR5. Its integrated graphics are the Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, which is a different product from the AMD Radeon 840M. It also uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a different platform from the AMD Socket AM5.

For use cases defined strictly by the database's benchmark measurements, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is the clear winner. It has scores in every workload category, while the Intel part has none. For use cases that prioritize the structural specifications, the Intel part offers a lower TDP, more cores, larger caches, and broader memory compatibility, but none of these are validated by any recorded performance data. The benchmark data supports the AMD part; the specification sheet alone supports the Intel part, but only in terms of features, not measured performance.