AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and Intel Core 7 150U represent two distinct approaches to modern computing, one aimed at desktop performance and the other at mobile efficiency. The recorded benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between them, with the AMD part winning every single head-to-head comparison in the database. This analysis examines the exact measurements, architectural choices, and specification differences that explain this outcome.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records 11 head-to-head comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and the Intel Core 7 150U, and the AMD processor wins all 11. The largest margin appears in extended instructions, where AMD scores 20648 against Intel's 8748, a delta of 136%. This suggests a substantial advantage in workloads that use advanced CPU instruction sets, likely reflecting the newer Zen 5 architecture's improved SIMD and vector processing capabilities.

Data compression shows the second-largest gap. AMD scores 292735 versus Intel's 158622, a delta of 84.5%. This workload heavily favors the AMD part, indicating stronger memory bandwidth utilization or more efficient data path handling. Random string sorting follows with a 70.3% delta (31106 vs 18269), another memory-intensive task where AMD's architecture excels.

Multi-threaded performance shows a significant but narrower margin. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 23487 in the PassMark multithread test, while the Intel Core 7 150U manages 14700, a delta of 59.8%. This result is notable because Intel actually has more physical cores (10 vs 6), yet AMD still leads by a wide margin, suggesting the Zen 5 cores are substantially more efficient per-thread.

Integer math favors AMD by 39.6% (71251 vs 51057), while floating point math shows a 32.9% delta (45711 vs 34405). Physics simulation, a test that often correlates with gaming performance, gives AMD a 31.3% advantage (1329 vs 1012). Data encryption shows a 35.5% delta (13585 vs 10025), and prime number finding gives AMD a 55.2% edge (90 vs 58).

The single-thread test shows the smallest gap but still favors AMD. The Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 4060 against Intel's 3508, a delta of 15.7%. This is meaningful because single-thread performance often drives everyday responsiveness and lightly-threaded applications. The consistency of AMD's wins across every category, from encryption to sorting to math, indicates a comprehensive performance advantage rather than a workload-specific one.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G wins every recorded benchmark category, so the "where each one wins" split is one-sided in the database. However, the nature of the wins varies by workload type. For compute-heavy tasks like extended instructions, integer math, and prime number finding, AMD's margins are particularly large, suggesting the Zen 5 core design delivers strong raw computational throughput per clock.

For memory-oriented workloads such as data compression and random string sorting, AMD also shows decisive leads, with deltas of 84.5% and 70.3% respectively. These results imply the AMD platform's memory subsystem, which includes a dual-channel DDR5 interface with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, handles data movement more effectively than the Intel part.

The Intel Core 7 150U still has a role in the broader market, as its 15W TDP and mobile BGA 1744 socket target thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency matters more than raw performance. The database shows Intel leads in no benchmark category, but the mobile segment values factors beyond benchmark scores, such as battery life and thermal management, which are not captured in these measurements.

For users who prioritize performance above all, the AMD part wins every workload recorded. For users who need a low-power mobile processor, the Intel part remains a relevant option despite its lower scores. The data shows no scenario in the recorded benchmarks where Intel outperforms AMD.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core 7 150U uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-U codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. This process node difference is significant: the smaller 4 nm node generally allows for higher transistor density and better power efficiency, which helps explain AMD's performance advantages.

Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but their L2 and L3 configurations differ. AMD uses 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. Intel uses 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel's larger L3 cache could theoretically help in cache-heavy workloads, but the benchmark data shows AMD still wins in all recorded tests, suggesting that other factors like core efficiency and memory bandwidth compensate for the smaller L3.

The core count differs substantially. Intel has 10 cores and 12 threads, while AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both support 12 threads total, but Intel achieves this with more physical cores, likely using a hybrid configuration of performance and efficiency cores common in Raptor Lake designs. AMD reaches 12 threads through simultaneous multithreading on 6 cores. Despite fewer physical cores, AMD's multithread score is 59.8% higher, indicating each Zen 5 core delivers significantly more throughput than each Raptor Lake core.

Boost clocks differ: Intel boosts to 5.40 GHz while AMD reaches 4.80 GHz. Intel's higher boost clock does not translate into a single-thread win, as AMD leads by 15.7% in that test. This suggests AMD's Zen 5 architecture achieves more instructions per clock than Intel's Raptor Lake design.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G operates with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 150U runs at 1.80 GHz base and 5.40 GHz boost. The TDP differs dramatically: AMD is rated at 65 watts, Intel at 15 watts. This 50-watt difference reflects their intended markets, with AMD targeting desktop systems and Intel targeting mobile devices, though the exact power consumption figures are not in the database.

AMD uses the AMD Socket AM5, which supports socketed processors and an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking. Intel uses the BGA 1744 socket, which is soldered to the motherboard and has a locked multiplier, preventing overclocking. AMD supports ECC memory, while Intel does not. AMD supports DDR5 memory only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. AMD's memory bandwidth is specified at 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's is not listed in the database.

PCIe lane counts differ: AMD provides 12 lanes of Gen 4 (CPU only), while Intel provides 8 lanes of Gen 4 (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. The database does not include graphics benchmarks, so their relative performance is not measured here.

AMD was released on February 28, 2026, and Intel on January 7, 2024. AMD has a part number of 100-000001918, while Intel uses SRMYP. AMD's market segment is Desktop, Intel's is Mobile. AMD's production status is Active, as is Intel's. Neither processor has a launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has an average benchmark score of 46187, while the Intel Core 7 150U averages 17395. This puts AMD at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while Intel sits at the 71st percentile.

Q: How much faster is AMD in multi-threaded workloads?

A: In the PassMark multithread test, AMD scores 23487 versus Intel's 14700, a delta of 59.8%. This is despite Intel having 10 physical cores versus AMD's 6.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: AMD scores 4060 in the PassMark single-thread test, while Intel scores 3508. This gives AMD a 15.7% advantage, even though Intel has a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz compared to AMD's 4.80 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. AMD supports DDR5 memory only, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. AMD also supports ECC memory, which Intel does not.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core 7 150U has a TDP of 15 watts. AMD also has an unlocked multiplier, while Intel's is locked.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: Intel has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while AMD has 8 MB. Intel also has more L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus AMD's 1 MB, but AMD still wins all recorded benchmarks.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G across every recorded workload. Its 11 wins out of 11 head-to-head comparisons, with deltas ranging from 15.7% to 136%, show a comprehensive performance advantage. The largest margins appear in extended instructions and data compression, while the smallest margin is in single-thread performance, though AMD still leads there by a significant amount.

For desktop users who need maximum throughput in compute, data, and memory-intensive tasks, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is the clear choice based on the recorded measurements. Its higher average score, better percentile ranking, and superior results in every category make it the stronger performer in this comparison.

The Intel Core 7 150U serves a different purpose. Its 15W TDP and mobile socket target portable devices where power efficiency is critical. The database shows no benchmark category where Intel wins, but the mobile market may value low power consumption and battery life over raw performance, which these benchmarks do not measure. Users who require a low-power processor for a thin laptop may still consider it, but anyone prioritizing performance should select the AMD part based on this data.