AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and Intel Core 3 201TE occupy different tiers of the desktop processor market, and the benchmark data reflects a clear separation in compute performance. The Ryzen AI 5 440G delivers an average benchmark score of 46187, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. The Core 3 201TE, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database and sits at the 50th percentile, which indicates a median-level standing based on its specifications and classification.

The Ryzen AI 5 440G posts a multithread score of 23487, a figure that demonstrates substantial parallel workload capability from its 6 cores and 12 threads. The single-thread score of 4060 further confirms strong per-core performance, which is notable for a processor with a 2.00 GHz base clock and 4.80 GHz boost clock. In integer math, the AMD part scores 71251, while floating-point math reaches 45711. Data compression workloads yield a score of 292735, and data encryption completes at 13585. Extended instruction workloads score 20648, while prime number finding scores 90. Physics processing records 1329, and random string sorting reaches 31106.

The nearest rivals for the Ryzen AI 5 440G provide context for its standing. The Intel Core i9-13900HX averages 46098, putting the AMD part 0.2% ahead. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 averages 46062, with the Ryzen AI 5 440G leading by 0.3%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 averages 46030, again a 0.3% advantage for the 440G. The AMD EPYC 4364P averages 45970, and the 440G holds a 0.5% lead. These margins are narrow, but they show that the Ryzen AI 5 440G outperforms a set of established high-end processors in aggregate scoring.

The Intel Core 3 201TE lacks recorded benchmark measurements, so direct head-to-head comparisons with the Ryzen AI 5 440G cannot be computed from the database. The wins totals for both processors stand at 0, confirming that no head-to-head benchmark entries exist. What the database does show is the structural difference: the AMD processor has 12 threads against the Intel processor's 8, a higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz, and a larger L3 cache configuration of 8 MB versus 12 MB shared. These specification differences, combined with the absence of any recorded scores for the Intel part, indicate that the Ryzen AI 5 440G is the higher-performing option based on available data.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 440G averages 46187. It leads the Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098) by 0.2%, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 (46062) by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030) by 0.3%, and the AMD EPYC 4364P (45970) by 0.5%.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201TE have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The benchmark array for the Intel Core 3 201TE is empty, and its average benchmark score is 0. It also has no nearest rivals listed, which means no comparative performance data exists for it.

Q: What is the multithread performance of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G?

A: The Ryzen AI 5 440G scores 23487 in the PassMark multithread test. This result comes from its 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G?

A: The single-thread score is 4060, recorded under both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread test names. This aligns with its 4.80 GHz boost clock.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G's 2.00 GHz base clock. However, the AMD part has a higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz versus 4.60 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and the Intel Core 3 201TE have ECC memory support enabled in their specifications.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G for users who prioritize compute performance. Its average benchmark score of 46187 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, and it edges out multiple high-end rivals by margins of 0.2% to 0.5%. The 12-thread configuration, 4.80 GHz boost clock, and recorded scores across integer math, floating-point math, compression, and encryption workloads all indicate a processor that handles demanding parallel tasks competently.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, with no recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile standing, cannot be positioned as a performance competitor based on the database. Its advantages are structural: a lower 45 W TDP, a higher 2.90 GHz base clock, dual memory support for DDR4 and DDR5, and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. These features make it a lower-power, more flexible platform option for systems that do not require maximum throughput.

For workloads measured by the database, the Ryzen AI 5 440G is the clear choice. The Intel part suits configurations where power draw, memory flexibility, or PCIe generation matters more than raw benchmark output. The lack of benchmark data for the Intel processor means any performance claims for it cannot be verified against the recorded measurements.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 201TE uses 4 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.90 GHz for Intel, while boost clocks are 4.80 GHz and 4.60 GHz respectively. TDP ratings are 65 W for AMD and 45 W for Intel.

The AMD part uses the AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The Ryzen AI 5 440G supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Core 3 201TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe configurations differ significantly. The AMD processor offers Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics also differ: the Ryzen AI 5 440G uses the Radeon 840M, while the Core 3 201TE uses UHD Graphics 730.

The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $134. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded in the database. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel processor does not. Production status for both is Active. Release dates differ as well: the Intel Core 3 201TE was released on 2025-01-12, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G was released on 2026-02-28.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation based on the Gorgon Point codename, using a hybrid of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core 3 201TE belongs to the Core 3 generation based on the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 163 mm².

Cache hierarchies differ between the two. The AMD processor uses 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor also uses 80 KB of L1 per core but has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 pool on the Intel part may benefit certain workloads that rely on shared cache access, though the AMD part's higher core count and thread count provide more parallel execution resources.

Memory architecture reflects the generational gap. The AMD part is limited to DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD part's higher memory bandwidth aligns with its higher compute throughput. The Intel part's dual memory support offers platform flexibility for users with existing DDR4 modules.

The process node difference is notable: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. This contributes to the AMD part's higher transistor density, though the database does not record transistor counts for either processor. The AMD part's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, whereas the Intel part's locked multiplier limits frequency adjustment to boost behavior only.

The integrated graphics solutions also reflect different design priorities. The Radeon 840M in the AMD part is paired with a 65 W TDP, suggesting a more capable iGPU solution for a desktop part. The UHD Graphics 730 in the Intel part operates within a 45 W TDP, which prioritizes lower power consumption over graphics throughput. Neither part's iGPU has benchmark scores recorded in the database, so direct graphics comparison is not possible from the available data.