AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G vs Intel Core 3 100UL Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and the Intel Core 3 100UL?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 100UL also has 6 cores but only 8 threads.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G boosts up to 4.80 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 3 100UL's maximum boost of 4.50 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, whereas the Intel Core 3 100UL uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory type?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core 3 100UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for these two desktop CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core 3 100UL has a much lower TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Which socket does each processor use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G uses AMD Socket AM5, and the Intel Core 3 100UL uses Intel Socket 1700.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and the Intel Core 3 100UL represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own fabs. The AMD chip belongs to the Gorgon Point generation, specifically the Ryzen AI 400 series built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. Intel's part is based on the older Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS generation.

Cache layouts differ notably. Both chips have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. However, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 100UL has a slightly larger 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 10 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives Intel a total L3 advantage of 2 MB, which can help in workloads that benefit from larger shared pools.

Memory support is another clear divergence. The AMD chip is restricted to DDR5, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD processor has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, whereas the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory support is present on the AMD side but absent on the Intel side.

PCIe capabilities also differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core 3 100UL provides Gen 4 with only 8 lanes. For systems needing more expansion lanes, the AMD part has the advantage.

The integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 64EU. The AMD processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the Intel processor is locked. The AMD chip has a die size of 195 mm², with no die size recorded for the Intel chip.

The production status is active for both. The AMD part was released on 2026-02-28, while the Intel part was released earlier on 2024-04-07. The market segment for both is desktop.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G and the Intel Core 3 100UL. The Intel Core 3 100UL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G, by contrast, has a substantial set of recorded PassMark results and an average benchmark score of 46187.

The AMD chip's individual scores paint a clear picture of its capabilities. In single-thread performance, it scores 4060. Its multithread score is 23487. The integer math score is 71251, and floating point math is 45711. Data compression scores 292735, while data encryption scores 13585. Extended instructions reach 20648. Prime number finding scores 90, physics scores 1329, and random string sorting scores 31106.

Without any recorded benchmarks for the Intel Core 3 100UL, there is no direct quantitative comparison available between the two in the database. The nearest rivals data for the AMD part provides some context for its standing in the broader CPU landscape. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-13900HX with an average score of 46098, just 0.2% behind. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 scores 46062, which is 0.3% behind the AMD part. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 46030, also 0.3% behind. The AMD EPYC 4364P scores 45970, 0.5% behind.

These delta percentages show that the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G sits at the top of a very tight cluster. The differences among these four rivals are minimal, ranging from 0.2% to 0.5%. This indicates the AMD chip competes directly with some of the strongest processors in its class. The Intel Core 3 100UL has no nearest rivals listed, reflecting the absence of benchmark data for that part.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G. It has a full suite of recorded scores, an average benchmark score of 46187, and an 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 100UL has no recorded benchmark scores at all, placing it at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero. For any workload where performance matters, the AMD part is the only one with measurable data to support a choice.

The AMD chip also offers a higher boost clock at 4.80 GHz versus 4.50 GHz, double the threads at 12 versus 8, and a much larger 65 watt TDP envelope compared to Intel's 15 watts. The higher TDP allows the AMD part to sustain higher performance, and the unlocked multiplier provides additional flexibility for users who want to adjust clock behavior.

The Intel Core 3 100UL does have advantages in specific areas. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving system builders more flexibility in memory selection. Its 15 watt TDP makes it suitable for low-power or passively cooled systems. Its larger shared L3 cache of 10 MB could benefit certain cache-sensitive workloads, though no benchmark data exists to confirm this.

For users prioritizing raw performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is the clear choice. For users prioritizing low power consumption and memory flexibility, the Intel part has structural appeal, but its lack of recorded benchmark data means its actual performance cannot be verified from the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz versus Intel's 1.20 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 4.80 GHz versus Intel's 4.50 GHz.

TDP is a major divergence: 65 watts for AMD versus 15 watts for Intel. The AMD socket is AM5, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. The foundry is TSMC for AMD and Intel for Intel. The die size is 195 mm² for AMD, with none recorded for Intel.

Cache configurations differ. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core for both. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 10 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 only, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD, none recorded for Intel. ECC memory is supported on AMD, not on Intel. PCIe lanes are Gen 4 with 12 lanes for AMD, Gen 4 with 8 lanes for Intel.

Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 840M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 64EU. The multiplier is unlocked on AMD, locked on Intel. The part number is 100-000001918 for AMD, unknown for Intel. The release date is 2026-02-28 for AMD and 2024-04-07 for Intel. The generation is Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) for AMD and Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS) for Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G wins in every measured performance category because it has recorded data and the Intel Core 3 100UL does not. The AMD chip's single-thread score of 4060, multithread score of 23487, and average benchmark score of 46187 establish it as a capable performer. Its 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs confirms its position in the upper tier of processors.

The AMD chip also wins on thread count, offering 12 threads versus Intel's 8. This matters for heavily threaded workloads such as rendering, compilation, and data processing. The higher boost clock of 4.80 GHz gives it an edge in lightly threaded tasks. The larger PCIe lane count of 12 versus 8 allows for more expansion devices. The unlocked multiplier enables overclocking, which the locked Intel part cannot offer.

The Intel Core 3 100UL wins on power efficiency, with a 15 watt TDP compared to AMD's 65 watts. This makes it suitable for compact, low-power desktop builds where heat and electricity draw are primary concerns. The Intel part also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, which allows system builders to reuse existing DDR4 modules or move to newer DDR5 kits. Its larger 10 MB shared L3 cache could theoretically benefit workloads that fit within that pool, though no benchmark data confirms this in practice.

The Intel part also has an earlier release date, which means it has been available longer in the market. Its active production status and support for legacy memory types make it a flexible option for basic desktop systems. However, with no recorded benchmark scores, the Intel Core 3 100UL's real-world performance remains unverified in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 440G is the only one of the two with comprehensive performance evidence, and it uses that evidence to claim every measurable performance win.