AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core i7-14700 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i7-14700 wins every recorded benchmark in this comparison, 15 out of 15. The margin varies from a modest single-digit difference in single-threaded tests to a crushing 64.6% deficit in prime number computation. The most lopsided result is PassMark's find prime numbers test, where the Intel scores 164 against the AMD's 58, a delta of -64.6%. The second-largest gap is data encryption: Intel scores 29,601, AMD scores 11,110, for a -62.5% difference. These two workloads, which are heavily dependent on raw integer throughput and memory bandwidth, expose the full performance chasm between the parts.

In multi-core rendering, the Intel is dominant. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows 28,398 for the Intel versus 11,333 for the AMD, a -60.1% gap. Cinebench R15 multi-core follows a similar pattern: 4,061 against 1,686, a -58.5% difference. The PassMark multi-thread score is 40,318 versus 19,000, a -52.9% gap. Floating point math is nearly as decisive: 106,716 versus 40,627, a -61.9% delta. Integer math lands at 154,535 versus 61,026, a -60.5% delta. Data compression shows 498,198 versus 225,374, a -54.8% gap, while random string sorting shows 54,340 versus 24,891, a -54.2% delta.

The Intel also wins in every single-threaded test, but the margins are far smaller. Cinebench R23 single-core: 2,080 versus 1,816, a -12.7% delta. Cinebench R15 single-core: 299 versus 260, a -13% delta. PassMark single-thread: 4,236 versus 3,734, a -11.9% delta. These results indicate that the Zen 5 architecture in the AMD is competitive in lightly threaded workloads, but it cannot match the Intel's peak boost clock advantage. The Intel's boost clock is 5.40 GHz, while the AMD's is 4.50 GHz, a difference that shows up directly in single-thread scores.

The average benchmark score tells the same story. The Intel Core i7-14700 has an average score of 52,301, which places it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has an average score of 28,128, at the 80th percentile. In terms of nearest rivals, the AMD sits near the Intel Core i5-13490F (average score 28,185, delta -0.2%), the Intel Core i5-14500T (28,065, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28,054, delta 0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G (28,032, delta 0.3%). The Intel Core i7-14700, by contrast, sits near the Intel Xeon Gold 5320H (52,431, delta -0.2%), the AMD EPYC 8124P (52,121, delta 0.3%), the Intel Core Ultra 5 235HX (52,073, delta 0.4%), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X (51,947, delta 0.7%). These nearest-rival comparisons confirm that the AMD is a mid-pack mobile processor, while the Intel is competing at the level of server and high-end desktop silicon.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It is a mobile part, designed for Socket FP8, with a 28 W TDP. The Intel Core i7-14700 uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It is a desktop part, designed for Socket 1700, with a 65 W TDP. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which explains why the AMD can deliver competitive single-thread performance at less than half the power envelope.

Core counts are radically different. The AMD has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel has 20 cores and 28 threads. The Intel's core count is more than triple the AMD's, and its thread count is more than double. This is the primary driver of the multi-core benchmark gaps. The AMD's L3 cache is 4 MB, while the Intel's L3 cache is 33 MB (shared). The AMD has 1 MB of L2 per core, the Intel has 2 MB per core. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core. The Intel's much larger L3 cache helps in data-heavy workloads, which is reflected in the data compression and random string sorting benchmarks.

Memory support differs. The AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with dual-channel memory and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. The AMD's support for LPDDR5X is notable for a mobile part, as it allows for lower power memory. Both support ECC memory. The PCIe interface differs: the AMD has Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel's newer PCIe standard and higher lane count make it better suited for high-bandwidth peripherals.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD uses the Radeon 840M, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The database does not record graphics benchmarks, so no performance comparison is possible. The Intel's die size is recorded as 257 mm², while the AMD's die size is not recorded. The Intel has a launch MSRP of $384, while the AMD has no recorded launch MSRP. The Intel's production status is Active, as is the AMD's. The AMD's release date is 2026-01-04, while the Intel's is 2024-01-07. The AMD's part number is 100-000001337, the Intel's is SRN40. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The Intel Core i7-14700 outperforms the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 in every single recorded benchmark. The Intel wins all 15 head-to-head comparisons, with the smallest margin being -11.9% in single-threaded tests and the largest being -64.6% in prime number finding. The Intel's average benchmark score is 52,301, which is 86% higher than the AMD's 28,128. The Intel sits at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD sits at the 80th percentile.

For multi-threaded workloads, the Intel is in a different class. The 20-core, 28-thread configuration delivers more than double the performance in Cinebench R23 multi-core (28,398 versus 11,333) and PassMark multi-thread (40,318 versus 19,000). The AMD's 6-core, 12-thread configuration cannot compete in any heavily parallel workload. The Intel's 33 MB of L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache give it a substantial advantage in data-intensive tasks, as shown by the data compression score of 498,198 versus 225,374.

The AMD's advantages are narrower. It is a mobile part with a 28 W TDP, while the Intel is a desktop part with a 65 W TDP. The AMD uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, which is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm process. In single-threaded performance, the AMD is within 12% of the Intel, which is a respectable showing given the power and core count differences. The AMD also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is not available on the Intel.

The verdict is straightforward: the Intel Core i7-14700 is the stronger processor by a wide margin in the recorded benchmarks. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is a capable mobile processor, but it does not have the core count, cache size, or clock speed to match the Intel in any measured workload. The Intel's nearest rivals include server-class Xeon and EPYC processors, while the AMD's nearest rivals are mid-range desktop and mobile chips. The Intel belongs to a higher performance tier entirely.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 | Intel Core i7-14700 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 20 |

| Threads | 12 | 28 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.50 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | Not recorded | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |

| Part Number | 100-000001337 | SRN40 |

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How much faster is the Intel in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel scores 28,398, while the AMD scores 11,333, resulting in a -60.1% delta for the AMD.

Q: What is the smallest performance gap between the two?

A: The smallest gap is in PassMark single-thread and singlethread tests, where the Intel scores 4,236 and the AMD scores 3,734, a -11.9% delta.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700 has 33 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 4 MB.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 and the Intel Core i7-14700 have ECC memory support listed in the database.

Q: What are the TDP values for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel Core i7-14700 has a TDP of 65 W.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700 wins in every recorded benchmark category. For heavily parallel workloads, the Intel is decisively ahead. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it delivers 28,398 points against 11,333, a 60.1% advantage. In PassMark integer math, it scores 154,535 against 61,026, a 60.5% advantage. In floating point math, it scores 106,716 against 40,627, a 61.9% advantage. In data compression, it scores 498,198 against 225,374, a 54.8% advantage. In data encryption, it scores 29,601 against 11,110, a 62.5% advantage. In prime number finding, it scores 164 against 58, a 64.6% advantage. In extended instructions, it scores 28,388 against 16,197, a 42.9% advantage. In random string sorting, it scores 54,340 against 24,891, a 54.2% advantage. In physics, it scores 2,226 against 1,075, a 51.7% advantage. In PassMark multi-thread, it scores 40,318 against 19,000, a 52.9% advantage.

For single-threaded workloads, the Intel still wins, but the gap is much smaller. Cinebench R23 single-core: 2,080 against 1,816, a 12.7% advantage. Cinebench R15 single-core: 299 against 260, a 13% advantage. PassMark single-thread: 4,236 against 3,734, an 11.9% advantage. This means that for lightly threaded tasks, the AMD is nearly competitive. The AMD's Zen 5 architecture and 4 nm process allow it to achieve respectable single-core performance despite its lower boost clock.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 does have advantages that are not captured by the benchmark scores. It is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops. It uses the newer 4 nm process at TSMC, which is more power-efficient than Intel's 10 nm process. It supports LPDDR5X memory, which is a power-saving option for mobile systems. Its integrated Radeon 840M graphics may be more capable than Intel's UHD Graphics 770, although the database records no graphics tests. The AMD also has a later release date, 2026-01-04 versus 2024-01-07, suggesting it is a newer design.

For desktop users seeking maximum multi-core performance, the Intel Core i7-14700 is the clear choice. Its 20 cores, 28 threads, 33 MB L3 cache, and 5.40 GHz boost clock deliver benchmark results that place it at the 91st percentile of all CPUs, alongside server-class Xeon and EPYC processors. For mobile users who prioritize power efficiency and portability, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 offers a lower TDP, a smaller process node, and LPDDR5X memory support, at the cost of significant multi-core performance. The recorded data does not show a single workload where the AMD wins, so any selection of the AMD would be based on form factor and power considerations rather than raw benchmark performance.