AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 5 435

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 213PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,686
2,192
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
260
309
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
11,333
21,751
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,816
3,070
passmark_data_compression
225,374
261,083
passmark_data_encryption
11,110
14,413
passmark_extended_instructions
16,197
16,146
passmark_find_prime_numbers
58
157
passmark_floating_point_math
40,627
71,722
passmark_integer_math
61,026
93,109
passmark_multithread
19,000
25,590
passmark_physics
1,075
2,199
passmark_random_string_sorting
24,891
30,106
passmark_single_thread
3,734
3,718
passmark_singlethread
3,734
3,718
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,135
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,289

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear overall winner in the Intel Core 5 213PTE, which takes 12 of the 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 manages only 3 wins, and two of those are essentially ties in single-threaded PassMark tests.

The largest margin in the entire comparison belongs to the Intel chip in Cinebench R23 multi-core. The Intel scores 21751 against the AMD's 11333, a difference of 47.9%. This is a massive gap in a heavily threaded rendering workload, and it aligns with the Intel part's 8 cores and 16 threads versus the AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows a smaller but still substantial gap of 23.1%, with Intel at 2192 and AMD at 1686.

Single-core performance also favors Intel decisively. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel scores 3070 against the AMD's 1816, a 40.8% advantage. The R15 single-core test shows a 15.9% lead for Intel (309 versus 260). These results are notable because the AMD chip's boost clock is listed at 4.50 GHz, while the Intel chip boosts to 5.20 GHz, and the data reflects that clock advantage in single-threaded workloads.

The PassMark suite tells a similar story across most math and compute tests. In floating point math, Intel leads by 43.4% (71722 versus 40627). Integer math shows a 34.5% Intel advantage (93109 versus 61026). The find prime numbers test is the most lopsided result of all, with Intel scoring 157 against the AMD's 58, a 63.1% gap. That test is heavily dependent on integer throughput and cache behavior, and the Intel chip's 24 MB of shared L3 cache likely plays a role here.

The physics test also heavily favors Intel, with a 51.1% lead (2199 versus 1075). Data encryption shows a 22.9% Intel advantage (14413 versus 11110). Data compression is closer, with Intel ahead by 13.7% (261083 versus 225374). Random string sorting shows a 17.3% Intel edge (30106 versus 24891). The PassMark multi-thread score gives Intel a 25.8% lead (25590 versus 19000).

The AMD chip's wins are narrow but worth noting. In PassMark extended instructions, AMD scores 16197 against Intel's 16146, a 0.3% margin. In the two PassMark single-thread listings (the database records both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread with identical values), AMD scores 3734 against Intel's 3718, a 0.4% edge. These are the only workloads where the AMD chip comes out ahead, and the margins are under half a percent.

The overall average benchmark scores in the database reflect this pattern. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has an average benchmark score of 32924 and sits at the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has an average of 28128 and sits at the 80th percentile. The Intel chip's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-12700 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D (0.5% behind), and the AMD Ryzen 7 8700G (0.5% behind). The AMD chip's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-13490F (0.2% behind) and the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (0.3% ahead).

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a straightforward conclusion: the Intel Core 5 213PTE is the stronger processor in nearly every measurable workload. Its 47.9% advantage in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 40.8% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core, and 63.1% edge in prime number finding are not marginal differences. The Intel chip also carries a higher percentile ranking, 83rd versus 80th, and a higher average benchmark score of 32924 versus 28128.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 does have the edge in PassMark single-threaded score by a 0.4% margin and in extended instructions by 0.3%. These are real wins, but they are small enough that they would be difficult to notice in practical use. The AMD chip also draws less power on paper, with a 28 watt TDP against the Intel's 45 watts, and it is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8. The Intel chip is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700.

For buyers choosing between these two, the data supports the Intel part for almost any compute-heavy task. The only scenario where the AMD chip looks preferable is one where the workload is dominated by very light single-threaded tasks, and even then the margin is under half a percent. The database does not record a launch MSRP for the AMD chip, while the Intel chip has a recorded launch MSRP of $221.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-threaded PassMark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 3734 in both passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 3718. The AMD chip wins by 0.4%.

Q: How large is the gap in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 21751, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 11333. The Intel chip leads by 47.9%.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any benchmark by a significant margin?

A: No. The AMD chip's largest recorded win is 0.4% in the PassMark single-threaded tests. Its other win is 0.3% in extended instructions.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE ranks at the 83rd percentile, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 ranks at the 80th percentile.

Q: How do the two compare in data compression workloads?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 261083 in PassMark data compression, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 225374. Intel leads by 13.7%.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across most core specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE uses 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz, and the Intel base clock is 2.10 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 4.50 GHz, while the Intel boost clock is 5.20 GHz.

Thermal design power differs substantially. The AMD chip is rated at 28 watts, and the Intel chip is rated at 45 watts. The sockets are incompatible: the AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip is a mobile part, while the Intel chip is a desktop part.

Memory support differs in type and bandwidth. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ. The AMD chip uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD chip uses Radeon 840M, and the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730.

The release dates are different. The AMD chip is recorded as released on 2026-01-04, while the Intel chip is recorded as released on 2026-03-08. The Intel chip has a recorded launch MSRP of $221. The AMD chip has no recorded launch MSRP. Both are listed as active production parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs come from different manufacturers and use different process nodes. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 is built on Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which uses a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, and the foundry is TSMC.

The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation. The process node is 10 nm, and the foundry is Intel. The architecture field is not recorded for the Intel part, but the generation and codename are listed.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. Both chips have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD chip and 2 MB per core on the Intel chip. The L3 cache is 4 MB on the AMD chip, while the Intel chip has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This difference in L3 capacity is substantial and likely contributes to the Intel chip's large lead in the prime number finding test.

The AMD chip is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier. Both are active production parts. The AMD part number is 100-000001337, and the Intel part number is SA4QM.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins in every heavily threaded workload in the database. The Cinebench R23 multi-core test shows a 47.9% lead, and the Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows a 23.1% lead. The PassMark multi-thread score gives Intel a 25.8% advantage. The physics test, which often reflects both thread scaling and floating point throughput, shows a 51.1% Intel lead. Integer math, floating point math, data encryption, data compression, random string sorting, and prime number finding all favor Intel by margins ranging from 13.7% to 63.1%.

The Intel chip also wins the single-core Cinebench tests. Its 40.8% lead in R23 single-core and 15.9% lead in R15 single-core indicate that the higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz delivers measurable results in lightly threaded rendering workloads. The Intel chip's 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per core L2 cache likely support its performance in cache-sensitive integer workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 wins only in PassMark single-threaded score (0.4%) and extended instructions (0.3%). These are the workloads where the AMD chip's Zen 5 architecture shows its efficiency. The AMD chip also has a lower TDP of 28 watts, which makes it a more power-efficient choice for mobile systems, and it supports LPDDR5X memory with higher recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

For use-case planning, the data supports the Intel chip for rendering, physics simulation, encryption, compression, and any workload that scales with cores and cache. The AMD chip is the better choice only for extremely narrow single-threaded PassMark scenarios, and even there the margin is negligible. The Intel chip's higher average benchmark score of 32924 and 83rd percentile ranking, compared to the AMD's 28128 and 80th percentile, reinforce the overall performance hierarchy.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 5 435
5 213PTE
Core Specs
Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5.2 +15.6%
Multiplier
20
21 +5.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
45 +60.7%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Gorgon Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$221
Part Number
100-000001337
SA4QM
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 5 435 Details View Core 5 213PTE Details