AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 5 435

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 365

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,686
2,842
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
260
303
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
11,333
18,698
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,816
1,992
passmark_data_compression
225,374
354,510
passmark_data_encryption
11,110
18,297
passmark_extended_instructions
16,197
25,113
passmark_find_prime_numbers
58
117
passmark_floating_point_math
40,627
62,802
passmark_integer_math
61,026
101,831
passmark_multithread
19,000
29,467
passmark_physics
1,075
1,704
passmark_random_string_sorting
24,891
39,447
passmark_single_thread
3,734
3,841
passmark_singlethread
3,734
3,841
geekbench_multicore
N/A
13,760
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,253

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a decisive performance advantage for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 across every recorded test. Out of 15 head-to-head comparisons, the Ryzen AI 9 365 wins all 15, with no victories recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435. The most significant margin appears in PassMark's find prime numbers test, where the Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 117 against 58, a delta of -50.4% for the Ryzen AI 5 435. This indicates nearly double the integer-heavy computational throughput in that specific workload.

Multi-core performance shows the largest gaps. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Ryzen AI 9 365 delivers 2842 points versus 1686 for the Ryzen AI 5 435, a 40.7% deficit for the smaller chip. Cinebench R23 multi-core follows a similar pattern: 18698 against 11333, a 39.4% gap. PassMark integer math shows 101831 versus 61026, a 40.1% difference, while PassMark data encryption reveals 18297 versus 11110, a 39.3% gap. These results consistently indicate that the Ryzen AI 9 365's additional cores translate into substantial throughput advantages in parallel workloads.

Single-core performance tells a different story in terms of magnitude. The Ryzen AI 9 365 leads in Cinebench R15 single-core with 303 points versus 260, a 14.2% advantage. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a smaller gap: 1992 versus 1816, an 8.8% lead. PassMark single-thread scores are nearly identical, with 3841 versus 3734, a mere 2.8% difference. This suggests that while the Ryzen AI 9 365 enjoys a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.50 GHz, the architectural efficiency of both Zen 5 parts keeps single-threaded performance relatively close.

Intermediate workloads follow the multi-core trend. PassMark data compression records 354510 for the Ryzen AI 9 365 against 225374, a 36.4% gap. PassMark extended instructions shows 25113 versus 16197, a 35.5% difference. PassMark floating point math delivers 62802 versus 40627, a 35.3% gap. PassMark multithread scores 29467 versus 19000, also a 35.5% difference. PassMark physics and random string sorting both show 36.9% deficits for the Ryzen AI 5 435, with scores of 1704 versus 1075 and 39447 versus 24891, respectively.

The average benchmark score reinforces this hierarchy. The Ryzen AI 9 365 achieves an average of 40048 across all recorded tests, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The Ryzen AI 5 435 averages 28128, sitting in the 80th percentile. The nearest rival for the Ryzen AI 9 365 is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with an average score of 40081, a 0.1% difference. For the Ryzen AI 5 435, the closest competitor is the Intel Core i5-13490F at 28185, a 0.2% gap in the opposite direction.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core benchmark tests?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins every multi-core test. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows 18698 for the Ryzen AI 9 365 versus 11333 for the Ryzen AI 5 435, a 39.4% advantage. PassMark multithread records 29467 versus 19000, a 35.5% gap.

Q: How close is single-threaded performance between the two chips?

A: Single-threaded scores are relatively close. PassMark single-thread shows 3841 for the Ryzen AI 9 365 versus 3734 for the Ryzen AI 5 435, a 2.8% difference. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a slightly larger gap at 8.8%, with scores of 1992 and 1816.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration difference?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both use Zen 5 architecture and a 4 nm process node from TSMC.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with identical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Ryzen AI 5 435 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 does not.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 boosts to 4.50 GHz. Both have a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a TDP of 28 watts.

Q: How do their integrated graphics compare?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Radeon 880M, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 uses the Radeon 840M. Both are integrated graphics solutions for the mobile segment.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins in all recorded benchmark categories, making it the clear choice for workloads that leverage multi-core parallelism. Cinebench R15 and R23 multi-core tests, which simulate rendering and 3D modeling tasks, show advantages of 40.7% and 39.4% respectively. PassMark integer math, data compression, and data encryption all show deficits between 36.4% and 40.1% for the Ryzen AI 5 435, indicating that the Ryzen AI 9 365 is substantially better suited for compression, encryption, and general integer-heavy computing.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 has no benchmark wins, but its closest margin comes in single-threaded performance. PassMark single-thread shows only a 2.8% gap, and Cinebench R23 single-core shows an 8.8% gap. This means that in lightly threaded applications, such as basic office productivity or web browsing, the user experience would be nearly identical between the two processors. The Ryzen AI 5 435 also carries a lower core count, which may translate to lower power draw in idle or lightly loaded scenarios, though the TDP rating for both is 28 watts.

For users prioritizing raw throughput in video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, or scientific computing, the Ryzen AI 9 365 delivers decisive advantages. The 50.4% lead in find prime numbers and the 40.1% lead in integer math are particularly notable for mathematical and computational workloads. The Ryzen AI 5 435 remains a capable option for everyday tasks where the multi-core gap is less impactful, but the data shows no scenario where it outperforms the Ryzen AI 9 365 in the recorded benchmarks.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most obvious difference. The Ryzen AI 9 365 features 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both share a base clock of 2.00 GHz, but the boost clock differs: 5.00 GHz for the Ryzen AI 9 365 versus 4.50 GHz for the Ryzen AI 5 435. TDP is identical at 28 watts for both.

Cache allocation shows a significant divergence. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 has only 4 MB. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core. The larger L3 cache in the Ryzen AI 9 365 likely contributes to its performance advantage in cache-sensitive workloads.

Memory support is similar, with both supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode at 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Ryzen AI 5 435 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 does not. PCIe connectivity differs slightly: the Ryzen AI 9 365 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Radeon 880M, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 uses the Radeon 840M. Both processors use the AMD Socket FP8 and are classified as mobile segment parts. The die size for the Ryzen AI 9 365 is 233 mm², while the die size for the Ryzen AI 5 435 is not recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on Zen 5 architecture using a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The codenames differ: the Ryzen AI 5 435 uses Gorgon Point, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Strix Point. The generation identifiers also differ, with the Ryzen AI 5 435 belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 series and the Ryzen AI 9 365 belonging to the Ryzen AI 300 series, though both are described as Zen 5 / Zen 5c.

The release dates are separated by roughly a year and a half. The Ryzen AI 9 365 was released on 2024-06-30, while the Ryzen AI 5 435 was released on 2026-01-04. Both have Active production status and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The part numbers are 100-000001530 for the Ryzen AI 9 365 and 100-000001337 for the Ryzen AI 5 435.

The process node, foundry (TSMC), and transistor counts are not fully specified in the database for either chip, though both use 4 nm technology. The L1 and L2 cache structure is identical on a per-core basis, but the total L3 cache differs substantially, as noted. The Ryzen AI 9 365 also carries a higher boost clock and more PCIe lanes, which may provide additional headroom for external devices and peripherals.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 5 435
AI 9 365
Core Specs
Cores
6
10 +66.7%
Threads
12
20 +66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2 0.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.5
5 +11.1%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2 0.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.5
5 +11.1%
Multiplier
20
20 0.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
Power
TDP (W)
28
28 0.0%
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
15-54 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Zen 5
Codename
Gorgon Point
Strix Point
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Process Size
4 nm
4 nm
Die Size
—
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
AMD Socket FP8
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
4 + 6
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
Radeon 880M
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001337
100-000001530
Package
FP8
FP8
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 5 435 Details View Ryzen AI 9 365 Details