AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and the Intel Core 5 213PE is decisively lopsided. The Intel part wins 15 of the 17 recorded tests, with the AMD processor claiming only two victories. The margin of Intel's dominance varies by workload, but the overall pattern is consistent: the Core 5 213PE delivers higher performance across nearly every measured category.

Starting with the Cinebench suite, the Intel processor leads in all six tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel chip scores 22468 against AMD's 20254, a 9.9% advantage. The single-core result in the same test shows Intel at 3172 versus 2859, again a 9.9% gap. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20: Intel scores 9436 multi-core and 1332 single-core, while AMD records 8506 and 1200 respectively, both at 9.9% deficits. Cinebench R15 follows the same trajectory, with Intel's 2264 multi-core and 319 single-core outpacing AMD's 2041 and 288, representing 9.8% and 9.7% leads for Intel.

The Passmark suite reveals a more varied landscape. Intel wins the multithread test with 26434 against AMD's 23850, a 9.8% margin. The single-thread result is similar: Intel scores 4060, AMD scores 3641, a 10.3% gap. In floating-point math, Intel's advantage expands to 26%, scoring 68587 versus 50746. The physics test shows an even larger gap at 27.7%, with Intel at 1624 and AMD at 1174. Prime number finding favors Intel by a massive 33.3%, with scores of 114 and 76 respectively. Integer math shows a closer contest: Intel leads with 92089 against 88339, a 4.1% margin. Extended instructions give Intel a modest 2.2% edge (19565 versus 19132). Data compression also goes to Intel, 298804 versus 272664, an 8.7% advantage.

The two AMD victories are worth examining closely. In data encryption, AMD scores 16441 against Intel's 15916, a 3.3% lead. In random string sorting, AMD records 33109 versus Intel's 32027, a 3.4% edge. These wins indicate that AMD's architecture retains strengths in specific memory-access patterns and cryptographic workloads, even as it trails in raw compute-heavy tasks.

The aggregated benchmark scores confirm the hierarchy. AMD's average benchmark score is 32233, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Intel's average is 35428, which puts it in the 85th percentile. The nearest rivals for AMD include the Intel Core i9-11900 (32226, 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-14400F (32279, -0.1% delta), the Intel Core i7-12800H (32121, 0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i5-14400 (32115, 0.4% delta). For Intel, the closest competitors are the Intel Core i7-13700T (35403, 0.1% delta), the Intel Core i7-12700KF (35365, 0.2% delta), the Intel Core i5-13600T (35305, 0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i7-12700K (35287, 0.4% delta). These rival groupings show that both processors sit in competitive performance tiers, but the Intel chip's position is higher overall.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE is the clear choice for compute-intensive workloads. Rendering, physics simulation, floating-point mathematics, and prime-number calculations all favor Intel, often by double-digit margins. The 27.7% advantage in the physics test and the 26% lead in floating-point math indicate that Intel's execution resources handle scientific and simulation tasks more efficiently. The 33.3% gap in prime-number finding suggests a significant advantage in integer-heavy algorithmic loops.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U retains specific niches. Data encryption shows a 3.3% lead, and random string sorting shows a 3.4% advantage. These results point to strengths in memory-latency-sensitive operations and cryptographic workloads, where AMD's memory subsystem and instruction handling provide measurable benefits. For users whose primary tasks involve encryption, secure communications, or sorting large datasets with irregular access patterns, the AMD part holds an edge.

For general-purpose productivity, the Intel chip leads in multithread performance by 9.8% and in single-thread performance by 10.3%. This means both lightly threaded and heavily threaded applications will run faster on the Intel processor. The data compression test, which reflects file archiving and storage workloads, also favors Intel by 8.7%. The extended instructions test, which measures SIMD and specialized instruction throughput, gives Intel a 2.2% edge.

The overall win count (15 for Intel, 2 for AMD) understates the magnitude of Intel's dominance in most categories. While AMD's two wins are real and consistent, they cover a narrow range of workloads. The Intel processor's advantages are broader and often much larger in percentage terms.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The chip integrates 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². Intel's Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundries. The transistor count and die size for the Intel part are not recorded in the database.

Core and cache configurations differ substantially. Both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads, but the cache hierarchies are organized differently. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L1 and L2 caches on the Intel side likely contribute to its single-thread and latency-sensitive performance advantages.

Clock speeds tell a similar story. AMD's base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Intel's base clock is lower at 2.70 GHz, but the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz. The higher boost ceiling on the Intel part helps explain its single-core performance lead, while the lower base clock reflects a different power management strategy.

Power and socket configurations diverge sharply. AMD's thermal design power is 28 watts, and it uses AMD Socket FP7. Intel's TDP is 65 watts, and it uses Intel Socket 1700. This difference underscores the intended market segments: the AMD chip is designed for mobile platforms, while the Intel chip targets desktop systems. The AMD part lists its market segment as Mobile, and Intel lists Desktop.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Both processors support ECC memory. The PCIe capabilities differ as well: AMD provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Intel's PCIe Gen 5 support offers higher bandwidth per lane, though AMD's additional lanes provide more total connectivity options.

Integrated graphics differ prominently. AMD includes the Radeon 780M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 730. This is a significant differentiator for systems without discrete GPUs, though the database does not record comparative graphics benchmark scores.

Release timing and production status are recorded. AMD's release date is 2024-04-15, and Intel's is 2026-03-08. Both are listed as Active in production. The AMD part numbers are 100-000001317 (FP7r2) and 100-000001377 (FP7), while Intel's part number is SA4QG.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has an average benchmark score of 35428, compared to 32233 for the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U. Intel also sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while AMD sits in the 83rd percentile.

Q: Are both processors 8-core, 16-thread designs?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and the Intel Core 5 213PE have 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two in any single test?

A: The largest gap is in the passmark find prime numbers test, where the Intel Core 5 213PE leads by 33.3%, scoring 114 versus AMD's 76.

Q: In which tests does the AMD processor outperform Intel?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U wins two tests: data encryption (16441 versus 15916, a 3.3% lead) and random string sorting (33109 versus 32027, a 3.4% lead).

Q: Do the two processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD chip supports DDR5 only, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel configurations, with AMD's bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s and Intel's at 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, slightly higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U's 5.10 GHz. Intel's base clock is lower at 2.70 GHz versus AMD's 3.30 GHz.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core 5 213PE delivers higher scores in 15 of 17 recorded tests, with advantages ranging from 2.2% to 33.3%. Its average benchmark score of 35428 places it in the 85th percentile, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700T and the Intel Core i7-12700KF, both with deltas under 0.5%. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, with an average of 32233 in the 83rd percentile, sits in a competitive tier alongside the Intel Core i9-11900 and the Intel Core i5-14400F.

The Intel processor is the stronger choice for rendering, physics, floating-point math, integer workloads, and general multithreaded and single-threaded applications. Its cache configuration (80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, 24 MB shared L3) and higher boost clock (5.20 GHz) support these results. The AMD processor remains preferable for data encryption and random string sorting, where its 3.3% and 3.4% leads indicate architecture-specific strengths.

The market segments differ, with AMD targeting mobile platforms (28 W TDP, Socket FP7) and Intel targeting desktops (65 W TDP, Socket 1700). The AMD chip's lower TDP makes it suitable for power-constrained environments, while the Intel chip's higher TDP allows sustained performance in desktop systems. Both support ECC memory, but only Intel offers PCIe Gen 5 (16 lanes), while AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

The database shows that the Intel Core 5 213PE is the higher-performing processor in nearly every measured category. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U retains niche advantages that matter for specific workloads, but the overall performance profile favors Intel. The Intel chip's launch MSRP is $221.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U | Intel Core 5 213PE |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 3.30 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-04-15 | 2026-03-08 |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Bartlett Lake |