AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core 5 223PQE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core 5 223PQE?

A: Both processors feature 8 cores and 16 threads, making them equivalent in raw parallel thread capacity. The AMD uses a Zen 4 architecture with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel runs at a higher base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE sits in the 50th percentile. This indicates the AMD part is positioned significantly higher in overall performance distribution.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has an average benchmark score of 39,603, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database. The AMD chip has a full suite of recorded benchmark results, whereas the Intel chip currently has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core 5 223PQE support ECC memory. Additionally, both use dual-channel memory buses with identical memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What integrated graphics do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS integrates a Radeon 780M GPU, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE integrates UHD Graphics 770. The AMD part is a mobile processor, whereas the Intel part is a desktop processor.

Q: When was each processor released?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS was released on April 15, 2024, and the Intel Core 5 223PQE was released on March 8, 2026. Both are currently active in production.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core 5 223PQE diverge sharply in their fundamental design approaches. The AMD chip belongs to the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors contained within a 178 mm² die. The Intel chip, by contrast, uses the Bartlett Lake codename and is built on Intel's 10 nm process. The Intel processor has no recorded transistor count or die size in the database.

The cache hierarchies differ notably. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 223PQE provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and a larger 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel part a substantial advantage in total cache capacity, particularly at the L3 level where it has 50% more shared cache.

Memory support also distinguishes the two. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with identical 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe capabilities differ as well: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, offering newer PCIe generation support but fewer lanes.

The market positioning is entirely different. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, designed for power-constrained notebooks. The Intel Core 5 223PQE is a desktop processor with a 125 W TDP, indicating a much higher power envelope. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core 5 223PQE. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither processor records any wins against the other in direct comparison. This absence of direct comparative data means the analysis must rely on the independent benchmark scores available for the AMD processor and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a comprehensive benchmark suite recorded. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,458 in multicore and 271.5 in singlecore. In Cinebench R23, it scores 14,784 in multicore and 1,724 in singlecore. PassMark results include 311,199 in data compression, 18,838 in data encryption, 22,298 in extended instructions, 84 in find prime numbers, 55,739 in floating point math, 93,342 in integer math, 26,646 in multithread, 1,351 in physics, 37,922 in random string sorting, and 3,692 in single thread tests.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. This makes a direct numerical performance comparison impossible based on the available data. What can be inferred is that the AMD processor's 87th percentile ranking against all CPUs places it well above the Intel processor's 50th percentile ranking, suggesting the AMD part delivers superior performance for most workloads, though the Intel part's higher clocks and larger caches may offer advantages in specific scenarios.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across multiple specification fields. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The Intel chip runs at higher clocks in both states, with a 0.70 GHz higher base and a 0.40 GHz higher boost.

The TDP differs substantially: the AMD part draws 28 W, while the Intel part draws 125 W. This represents a 97 W difference in thermal design power, reflecting the mobile versus desktop segmentation.

The process nodes differ: the AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD chip has 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die; the Intel chip has no recorded transistor or die size data.

Cache configurations differ across all levels. The AMD provides 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Intel provides 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3.

Memory support differs: the AMD supports DDR5 only, while the Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. PCIe support differs: the AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while the Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: the AMD uses Radeon 780M, the Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD uses AMD Socket FP7, the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD is a mobile part, the Intel is a desktop part. The AMD has a release date of April 15, 2024, and the Intel has a release date of March 8, 2026. The Intel has a launch MSRP of $319, while the AMD has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the stronger processor based on recorded benchmark performance. Its 87th percentile ranking versus the Intel's 50th percentile ranking shows a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD processor's average benchmark score of 39,603, derived from a full suite of tests, provides concrete evidence of its capabilities. The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores, so its performance cannot be verified from the database.

The AMD processor delivers a complete performance profile across Cinebench R15 and R23 multicore and singlecore tests, plus a wide range of PassMark workloads including integer math, floating point math, encryption, compression, and physics simulations. These scores place it in the upper tier of all CPUs.

The Intel processor offers higher clock speeds: a 4.00 GHz base and 5.50 GHz boost compared to 3.30 GHz and 5.10 GHz for the AMD. It also provides larger caches: 24 MB L3 versus 16 MB L3, and 2 MB L2 per core versus 1 MB L2 per core. These specifications could benefit workloads that are sensitive to clock speed and cache capacity, but without benchmark scores, this remains speculative.

The power characteristics diverge strongly. The AMD part uses 28 W, making it suitable for mobile platforms. The Intel part uses 125 W, indicating a desktop-oriented design with higher power delivery requirements. The AMD's 4 nm process from TSMC provides a manufacturing advantage over Intel's 10 nm process, likely contributing to its efficiency.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS should be selected by users who need verified performance, efficiency, and a mobile form factor. The Intel Core 5 223PQE should be selected by users who require a desktop socket, support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, and higher clock speeds, accepting that its performance has not yet been measured in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS wins in every recorded benchmark category due to the absence of Intel benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 14,784 and singlecore score of 1,724 demonstrate strong synthetic rendering performance. Its PassMark integer math score of 93,342 and floating point math score of 55,739 show solid arithmetic throughput. The data compression score of 311,199 and encryption score of 18,838 indicate capable data handling.

The AMD processor also wins in efficiency metrics. Its 28 W TDP versus the Intel's 125 W TDP means it delivers its performance at a fraction of the power draw. The 4 nm TSMC process node gives it a manufacturing advantage, and the 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide more total lanes than the Intel's 16 Gen 5 lanes.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE wins on raw clock speed specifications. Its 4.00 GHz base clock and 5.50 GHz boost clock exceed the AMD's 3.30 GHz and 5.10 GHz respectively. The Intel part also wins on cache capacity, with 24 MB of shared L3 cache compared to 16 MB, and 2 MB L2 per core compared to 1 MB. The Intel part supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, providing broader memory compatibility. Its PCIe Gen 5 support offers newer connectivity standards.

The Intel processor wins in desktop-specific features. It uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop platform, and carries a launch MSRP of $319. It includes UHD Graphics 770 integrated graphics. The AMD processor, as a mobile part, uses AMD Socket FP7 and includes Radeon 780M integrated graphics.

For mobile users seeking verified performance with minimal power consumption, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the clear choice based on its benchmark scores and 28 W TDP. For desktop users prioritizing clock speed, cache size, and memory flexibility, the Intel Core 5 223PQE offers those specifications, though its benchmark performance remains unverified in the database.