AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for this comparison is one-sided. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a full suite of benchmark results across Cinebench and Passmark tests, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no individual benchmark scores recorded in the database. This absence of Intel data means every measurable comparison defaults to the AMD processor.

In Cinebench R23, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS delivers a multicore score of 14784 and a single-core score of 1724. The Cinebench R15 results show a multicore score of 2458 and a single-core score of 271.5. These scores position the AMD chip at the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms the vast majority of recorded processors.

The Passmark suite reinforces this standing. The AMD processor achieves a multithread score of 26646, a single-thread score of 3692, and an average benchmark score of 39603. Its integer math score reaches 93342, floating point math hits 55739, and extended instructions score 22298. Data compression performance is recorded at 311199, data encryption at 18838, and random string sorting at 37922. Physics testing produces a score of 1351, while the find prime numbers test yields a modest 84.

Since the Intel Core i5-14501TE has zero recorded benchmark scores, the database shows no head-to-head matchups and no wins for either processor. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS therefore stands as the only processor with measurable performance data in this comparison. The Intel chip's average benchmark score is listed as zero, and its percentile rank is 50, which reflects the midpoint position assigned to processors without recorded results rather than any actual measured performance.

The AMD processor's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 scores 39485, which is 0.3% behind the 8840HS. The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D scores 39768, putting it 0.4% ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS scores 39325, trailing by 0.7%, and the AMD EPYC 4245P scores 39215, trailing by 1%. These narrow margins show the 8840HS sits in a tightly contested performance band among other AMD processors.

The Verdict

The data overwhelmingly favors the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS in this comparison. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so its performance cannot be quantified. The AMD processor, by contrast, has a complete benchmark profile across fifteen tests and holds the 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs.

The Intel processor's 50th percentile ranking is not a measured result but a default position for a chip with no benchmark data. This means the database cannot confirm any performance advantage for the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS delivers measurable results in every recorded test, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE delivers none.

For users selecting between these two based on the database alone, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is the only option with verified performance metrics. The Intel chip's capabilities remain unquantified, making any performance-based recommendation impossible. The AMD processor's benchmark scores and 87th percentile ranking establish it as a high-performing processor in the database's broader context.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the codename Hawk Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the 8000 series and the Ryzen 7 generation. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and the Core i5 generation.

The AMD processor contains 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor contains 6 cores and 12 threads. Both processors have a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, but their base clocks differ: the AMD chip runs at 3.30 GHz, while the Intel chip runs at 2.20 GHz. The AMD processor has a thermal design power of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a thermal design power of 45 watts.

Cache configurations differ notably between the two. The AMD processor features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor features 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel chip a larger total cache, though the AMD chip's lower per-core L1 and L2 values align with its different core count and design.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel chip is classified as a desktop processor. The AMD chip's die size is 178 mm² with 25,000 million transistors, while the Intel chip's die size is 215 mm² with no transistor count recorded.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory only, with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though its memory bandwidth is not recorded. Both processors support ECC memory.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Radeon 780M, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE uses UHD Graphics 770. PCIe support shows the AMD chip with Gen 4 and 20 lanes, while the Intel chip supports Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The AMD processor was released on April 15, 2024, while the Intel processor was released on June 30, 2024. Both processors are currently active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: Both processors share the same boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a lower thermal design power?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a TDP of 28 watts, which is lower than the Intel Core i5-14501TE's 45 watts.

Q: Does the Intel processor support DDR4 memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS supports DDR5 only.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS wins in every category where benchmark data exists. Its multicore performance is recorded at 14784 in Cinebench R23 and 2458 in Cinebench R15. Its single-core performance is recorded at 1724 in Cinebench R23 and 271.5 in Cinebench R15. The Passmark suite shows strong results across multithread, single-thread, integer math, floating point math, data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, and random string sorting.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmark scores, so the database cannot establish any performance wins for this processor. Its 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder value, not a measured outcome. The processor's architecture provides 6 cores and 12 threads, a 2.20 GHz base clock, 24 MB of shared L3 cache, and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory, but none of these specifications translate into recorded benchmark results.

The AMD processor's 87th percentile ranking places it above the large majority of CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 39603 sits within 1% of several closely matched AMD rivals, including the Ryzen AI 7 450, Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS, and EPYC 4245P. This tight clustering indicates the 8840HS delivers performance consistent with a high-tier processor in the database.

For workloads requiring mobile efficiency, the AMD chip's 28-watt TDP and 4 nm process node provide a power profile that the 45-watt Intel chip on 10 nm cannot match based on the recorded specifications. The AMD chip's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and Radeon 780M integrated graphics further differentiate it from the Intel chip's UHD Graphics 770 and unrecorded memory bandwidth.

The Intel chip does hold advantages in certain specifications. Its 24 MB of shared L3 cache exceeds the AMD chip's 16 MB. Its Gen 5 PCIe support with 16 lanes surpasses the AMD chip's Gen 4 with 20 lanes in terms of generation, though the AMD chip offers more lanes. The Intel chip's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provides broader memory compatibility than the AMD chip's DDR5-only support.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks differ at 3.30 GHz for AMD and 2.20 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks match at 5.10 GHz for both. TDP differs at 28 watts for AMD and 45 watts for Intel.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD architecture is Zen 4 with the codename Hawk Point, while the Intel architecture is Raptor Lake with the codename Raptor Lake-R. Process nodes differ at 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. The AMD foundry is TSMC, while the Intel foundry is Intel. The AMD die size is 178 mm², while the Intel die size is 215 mm². The AMD transistor count is 25,000 million, while the Intel transistor count is not recorded.

Cache layouts differ per core and in shared L3. The AMD chip has 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. Memory support differs with DDR5-only on AMD and DDR4 plus DDR5 on Intel. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s on AMD, while Intel's is not recorded. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe support differs with Gen 4 and 20 lanes on AMD versus Gen 5 and 16 lanes on Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 780M on AMD and UHD Graphics 770 on Intel. Market segments differ with mobile on AMD and desktop on Intel. Release dates differ with April 15, 2024 for AMD and June 30, 2024 for Intel. Both processors are active in production, neither has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP.