AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Core 5 213PTE
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Intel Core 5 213PTE
The Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and Intel Core 5 213PTE are both 8-core, 16-thread processors, but they serve different market segments and deliver distinctly different performance profiles. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the stronger choice for single-threaded and physics-heavy workloads, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS dominates in data compression, encryption, and extended instruction workloads. The Intel part wins 8 of the 15 head-to-head benchmarks, while the AMD part wins 7. The Intel processor holds a higher average benchmark score in Cinebench R23 multicore, but the AMD chip counters with a better overall percentile ranking. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is suited for desktop users who need high single-core performance and physics simulation capability. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is better for mobile users who prioritize data processing, security workloads, and power efficiency, as it carries a 28 W TDP versus Intel's 45 W TDP. The data shows no clear overall victor; the correct pick depends entirely on workload priority.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 5 213PTE wins decisively in Cinebench R23 multicore with a score of 21751 versus 14784, a 32% advantage. It also leads in Cinebench R23 singlecore by 43.8% (3070 versus 1724) and in Cinebench R15 singlecore by 12.1% (309 versus 271.5). In PassMark physics, the Intel part scores 2199 against 1351, a 38.6% lead. It also wins floating point math (71722 versus 55739, 22.3% ahead), prime number finding (157 versus 84, 46.5% ahead), and single-thread performance (3718 versus 3692, a narrow 0.7% margin). These results indicate the Intel processor is the better fit for simulation, rendering, and single-threaded application responsiveness.
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS wins in PassMark data compression by 19.2% (311199 versus 261083), data encryption by 30.7% (18838 versus 14413), and extended instructions by 38.1% (22298 versus 16146). It also leads in random string sorting by 26% (37922 versus 30106), multithread by 4.1% (26646 versus 25590), and integer math by a razor-thin 0.3% (93342 versus 93109). In Cinebench R15 multicore, the AMD part wins 2458 versus 2192, a 12.1% margin. These wins point to strong data manipulation, cryptographic, and SIMD-heavy performance on the AMD side.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, codenamed Hawk Point. It packs 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses a 10 nm Intel process with the Bartlett Lake codename. The AMD chip features 64 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. The Intel chip has 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB shared L3. The AMD processor supports only DDR5 memory with dual-channel bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, with dual-channel bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP7 and provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD integrated graphics are Radeon 780M; the Intel integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part is a mobile processor, while the Intel part is a desktop processor. The AMD base clock is 3.30 GHz with a boost of 5.10 GHz; the Intel base clock is 2.10 GHz with a boost of 5.20 GHz. The AMD TDP is 28 W, the Intel TDP is 45 W. Both have locked multipliers. The AMD release date is April 15, 2024; the Intel release date is March 8, 2026.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score in Cinebench R23?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 3070, which is 43.8% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS at 1724.
Q: Which processor is better for data encryption workloads?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS scores 18838 in PassMark data encryption, which is 30.7% ahead of the Intel Core 5 213PTE's 14413.
Q: How do the two processors compare in terms of power consumption?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE has a 45 W TDP, making the AMD part the lower-power option.
Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?
A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has 16 MB.
Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?
A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS and the Intel Core 5 213PTE support ECC memory.
Q: Which processor has a higher overall percentile ranking?
A: The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS ranks in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE ranks in the 83rd percentile.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The largest single benchmark win belongs to the Intel Core 5 213PTE in Cinebench R23 singlecore, where it leads by 43.8% (3070 versus 1724). The next biggest Intel win is in PassMark find prime numbers, with a 46.5% advantage (157 versus 84). Intel also leads in PassMark physics by 38.6% (2199 versus 1351) and in Cinebench R23 multicore by 32% (21751 versus 14784). The Intel floating-point math score is 22.3% higher (71722 versus 55739). The Intel single-thread advantage is small at 0.7% (3718 versus 3692), and the Cinebench R15 singlecore lead is 12.1% (309 versus 271.5).
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS counters with a 38.1% win in PassMark extended instructions (22298 versus 16146). It leads in data encryption by 30.7% (18838 versus 14413) and in random string sorting by 26% (37922 versus 30106). Data compression shows a 19.2% AMD advantage (311199 versus 261083). The AMD Cinebench R15 multicore win is 12.1% (2458 versus 2192). PassMark multithread favors AMD by 4.1% (26646 versus 25590), and integer math is essentially tied with a 0.3% AMD edge (93342 versus 93109). The data shows a clear split: Intel wins all Cinebench tests except R15 multicore, while AMD wins the majority of PassMark throughput tests.
Specification Differences
The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE uses a 10 nm Intel process. The AMD transistor count is 25,000 million; the Intel transistor count is not recorded. The AMD die size is 178 mm²; the Intel die size is not recorded. The AMD L1 cache is 64 KB per core, the Intel L1 is 80 KB per core. The AMD L2 cache is 1 MB per core, the Intel L2 is 2 MB per core. The AMD L3 cache is 16 MB shared, the Intel L3 is 24 MB shared. The AMD memory support is DDR5 only; the Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s; the Intel is 76.8 GB/s. The AMD PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 lanes; the Intel is Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD integrated graphics are Radeon 780M; the Intel integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730. The AMD socket is FP7; the Intel socket is 1700. The AMD market segment is mobile; the Intel is desktop. The AMD base clock is 3.30 GHz; the Intel base clock is 2.10 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 5.10 GHz; the Intel boost clock is 5.20 GHz. The AMD TDP is 28 W; the Intel TDP is 45 W. The AMD release date is April 15, 2024; the Intel release date is March 8, 2026. The Intel launch MSRP is $221; the AMD launch MSRP is not recorded.