AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and the Intel Core 5 213PE are 8-core, 16-thread desktop processors aimed at professional workloads, but the benchmark data reveals two distinct personalities. The Intel chip claims more individual benchmark wins (11 versus 6), yet the AMD part counters with substantial victories in specific specialized tasks. This analysis breaks down where each processor excels, the architectural reasons behind those splits, and which workloads should drive a purchasing decision.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE establishes its dominance in rendering and general compute throughput. Across the entire Cinebench suite—R15, R20, and R23—the Intel chip wins both multi-core and single-core tests. The margins are narrow but consistent, ranging from 1.4% to 1.6% in the AMD part’s favor on every Cinebench test. The Intel processor also takes the PassMark multithread test (26434 vs 26054, a 1.4% edge) and delivers a decisive win in floating-point math, scoring 68587 against the AMD’s 52105—a 24% advantage. The physics test shows the largest single delta, with Intel leading 1624 to 1109, a 31.7% gap. Single-thread performance also belongs to Intel, with a 4060 score versus 3442, a 15.2% lead.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 wins the remaining six benchmarks, and its victories are often more pronounced. The biggest win comes in data encryption, where it scores 19815 against Intel’s 15916, a 24.5% margin. Data compression goes to AMD by 5.2% (314363 vs 298804), and random string sorting by 5.4% (33754 vs 32027). Extended instructions favor AMD by 7.9% (21117 vs 19565). The AMD chip also edges out Intel in integer math (94884 vs 92089, a 3% lead) and in the find prime numbers test (115 vs 114, a 0.9% margin). The pattern is clear: Intel wins broad rendering and floating-point tasks, while AMD dominates encryption, compression, and integer-heavy workloads.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is built on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer) using a 7 nm process from TSMC, with a transistor count of 4,150 million on a 74 mm² die. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on Intel’s 10 nm process. This process node difference likely explains some of the thermal and efficiency characteristics, though both are rated at 65 W TDP.

Cache configurations differ significantly. AMD provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, with a large 32 MB shared L3 cache. Intel offers 80 KB of L1 per core and a much larger 2 MB of L2 per core, but a smaller 24 MB shared L3. The larger L2 on Intel suggests a design favoring per-core locality, while AMD’s larger L3 pool is suited for shared data across all eight cores. The memory controllers also differ: AMD supports DDR4 only with dual-channel bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 with a higher dual-channel bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. This memory bandwidth advantage for Intel aligns with its floating-point and physics test wins.

PCIe capabilities differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 across 20 CPU lanes and Intel providing Gen 5 across 16 lanes. Intel also integrates UHD Graphics 730, while the AMD part has no integrated graphics, requiring a discrete GPU. Both processors support ECC memory, a key feature for professional reliability. The AMD chip uses Socket AM4, while Intel uses Socket 1700, meaning they are not interchangeable in existing systems. The AMD part launched in April 2022, while the Intel chip is slated for March 2026, making it a much newer design.

The Verdict

The benchmark data suggests the Intel Core 5 213PE is the better all-around choice for users prioritizing rendering performance and raw single-thread speed. Its Cinebench wins, while narrow, are consistent across all six tests, indicating a reliable advantage in 3D modeling and video rendering workloads. The 31.7% lead in physics and 24% lead in floating-point math further cement its position for scientific computing and physics simulations. The 15.2% single-thread advantage also makes it the superior pick for lightly-threaded applications that depend on one fast core.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the specialist’s choice for security and data-heavy tasks. The 24.5% encryption lead is substantial, making it better for VPN gateways, secure file servers, and database encryption workloads. Its wins in compression (5.2%), random string sorting (5.4%), and extended instructions (7.9%) suggest it handles data transformation and parsing more efficiently. For integer math, the 3% lead is modest but consistent with AMD’s design strengths. Users running compression libraries, encryption pipelines, or integer-heavy analytics should prefer the AMD.

The overall average benchmark scores are extremely close—35802 for AMD and 35428 for Intel, a difference of about 1%. Both processors sit at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals within 0.4% of their average scores. This means the choice is not about overall capability but about matching the processor to the specific workload. For a general-purpose professional desktop, the Intel chip’s broader wins make it the safer default. For security-focused or data-centric servers, the AMD part offers decisive advantages where it matters most.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU wins more benchmarks overall?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE wins 11 of the 17 head-to-head benchmarks, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 wins 6.

Q: Is the Intel chip faster in single-thread performance?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 4060 in PassMark single-thread tests versus 3442 for the AMD, a 15.2% advantage. It also wins all three Cinebench single-core tests by 1.5-1.6%.

Q: In which workload does the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 have the biggest advantage?

A: The AMD chip’s largest win is in PassMark data encryption, where it scores 19815 against Intel’s 15916, a 24.5% margin.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and the Intel Core 5 213PE support ECC memory.

Q: Which CPU has a higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 supports only DDR4 with 51.2 GB/s.

Q: Are these CPUs comparable in overall average performance?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has an average benchmark score of 35802, and the Intel Core 5 213PE has 35428—a difference of roughly 1%, with both at the 85th percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic Intel victory is in PassMark physics, where it scores 1624 against AMD’s 1109, a 31.7% delta. This is the largest percentage difference in any test. Floating-point math shows a 24% Intel lead (68587 vs 52105), reflecting its superior FPU throughput. The single-thread gap of 15.2% (4060 vs 3442) is the third-largest margin, making Intel the clear choice for legacy single-threaded applications. In multithread, Intel wins by 1.4% (26434 vs 26054), a narrow but real edge.

The AMD counter-attacks most strongly in data encryption, winning by 24.5% (19815 vs 15916). This is followed by a 7.9% win in extended instructions (21117 vs 19565) and a 5.4% win in random string sorting (33754 vs 32027). Data compression goes to AMD by 5.2% (314363 vs 298804). Integer math is a 3% AMD win (94884 vs 92089), while the find prime numbers test is essentially tied, with AMD ahead by just 0.9% (115 vs 114).

The Cinebench results are remarkably consistent, with Intel winning all six tests by margins between 1.4% and 1.6%. These narrow but uniform deltas suggest a stable architectural advantage in rendering workloads. The PassMark multithread result (Intel by 1.4%) aligns with this pattern. Overall, Intel wins the rendering and physics categories decisively, while AMD dominates encryption and data transformation tasks. The total score tally is 11-6 in Intel’s favor, but the AMD’s 24.5% encryption win is more impactful than Intel’s narrow Cinebench edges.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications beyond their benchmark scores. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has a lower base of 2.70 GHz but a higher boost of 5.20 GHz. Both have 8 cores and 16 threads and a 65 W TDP. The AMD uses a 7 nm TSMC process, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry. The AMD chip has 4,150 million transistors on a 74 mm² die; Intel does not disclose these figures.

Cache layouts differ: AMD uses 64 KB L1 per core and 512 KB L2 per core with 32 MB shared L3, while Intel uses 80 KB L1 per core and 2 MB L2 per core with 24 MB shared L3. Memory support splits as AMD only supports DDR4 (51.2 GB/s), while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 (76.8 GB/s). PCIe generations differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 (20 lanes) and Intel offering Gen 5 (16 lanes). The Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 730 integrated graphics, while the AMD has none. Both support ECC memory and have locked multipliers. The AMD uses Socket AM4, Intel uses Socket 1700, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. Release dates are April 2022 for AMD and March 2026 for Intel.