AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 vs AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 are both 8-core, 16-thread processors, yet they are engineered for entirely different purposes. The data shows a clear split: the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is a desktop powerhouse that dominates sustained multi-threaded workloads, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 is a mobile part that wins on efficiency and specific single-thread tasks. The benchmark results indicate that the choice between them hinges on your platform and workload priorities, not just raw core counts.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is the clear winner for compute-heavy desktop tasks. It secures 11 out of 15 head-to-head benchmark victories, with its most significant advantages in heavily threaded applications. The largest margin comes in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where it scores 22145 versus the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's 14278.5, a 55.1% advantage. It also leads by 37% in PassMark data encryption (19815 vs 14462) and by 42% in prime number finding (115 vs 81). For rendering, compilation, or any workload that scales across all cores, this desktop chip is decisively faster.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins in fewer but strategically important areas. It takes the PassMark single-thread test with a score of 3872 versus 3442, an 11.1% lead. It also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core (2336.5 vs 2232) and PassMark physics (1318 vs 1109). The physics win is notable, as it suggests better performance in simulation or gaming-related physics calculations. However, its overall benchmark average is nearly identical to the 5845 (35719 vs 35802), indicating that its strengths are concentrated rather than broad.

Architecture Differences

The two CPUs represent different generations and design philosophies. The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 uses the Zen 3 architecture on TSMC's 7 nm process, with a die size of 74 mm². It features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and a large 32 MB shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and has no integrated graphics.

In contrast, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 uses the newer Zen 5 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm process, with a much larger die size of 195 mm². Its cache layout is different: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, but only 8 MB of shared L3. It supports faster DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, a 75% increase over the 5845. It also includes integrated Radeon 860M graphics, which the 5845 lacks entirely. These differences explain why the AI 7 PRO 350 has a much lower 28W TDP compared to the 5845's 65W, despite having a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz versus 4.60 GHz.

The Verdict

Pick the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 if you are building a desktop on the AM4 platform and need maximum multi-threaded throughput. The data shows it is 55.1% faster in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 37% faster in data encryption. Its 65W TDP is manageable with a capable air cooler, and its large 32 MB L3 cache likely helps in many workloads. It is the better choice for rendering, video encoding, and heavy productivity.

Pick the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 if you need a mobile processor with strong single-thread performance and integrated graphics. It wins the PassMark single-thread test by 11.1% and includes Radeon 860M graphics, eliminating the need for a discrete GPU in basic systems. Its 28W TDP makes it far more suitable for laptops where battery life and thermal management are critical. The higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s also gives it an edge in memory-sensitive tasks, even though its L3 cache is smaller.

The overall benchmark averages are nearly tied (35802 vs 35719), so this is not a question of which is "better" overall, but which fits your use case. The 5845 is a desktop workhorse; the AI 7 PRO 350 is a mobile all-rounder.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: Both have 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Is the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 faster in multi-threaded rendering?

A: Yes, by a significant margin. It scores 22145 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 55.1% higher than the 14278.5 from the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350.

Q: Does the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes Radeon 860M integrated graphics. The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has no integrated graphics.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, compared to 4.60 GHz for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.

Q: What memory types do they support?

A: The Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 supports DDR4, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: Which CPU wins the PassMark physics test?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 wins with a score of 1318, which is 15.9% higher than the 1109 from the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The biggest win for the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its score of 22145 crushes the 14278.5 from the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, a 60% delta in the single-core variant (3126 vs 1954) and 55.1% in multi-core. This shows the 5845's Zen 3 architecture with a 65W TDP is far more capable of sustaining high multi-threaded loads than the mobile chip.

In PassMark integer math, the 5845 scores 94884 versus 84868, an 11.8% lead. Data compression also favors the 5845 (314363 vs 281834, an 11.5% delta). Data encryption is even more one-sided: 19815 vs 14462, a 37% advantage. The 5845 also wins extended instructions by 5.8% (21117 vs 19955) and floating-point math by a narrow 0.9% (52105 vs 51639).

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350's biggest win is PassMark single-thread, scoring 3872 versus 3442, an 11.1% advantage. This is its most substantial victory. It also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 4.5% (2336.5 vs 2232) and PassMark physics by 15.9% (1318 vs 1109). These wins suggest that while it cannot match the 5845 in long-running multi-threaded tasks, it has superior per-core performance and better efficiency in specific short bursts.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 | AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Zen 3 | Zen 5 |

| Codename | Vermeer | Krackan Point |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |

| Die Size | 74 mm² | 195 mm² |

| Base Clock | 3.40 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 28 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (shared) | 8 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes | Gen 4, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon 860M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2022-04-03 | 2025-01-05 |